Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Then what is? hmm? my rectum perhaps?Sorry dude, but you don't decide what is canon and what is not.
😆 Wow, your such a hypocrite. . . When you were busy whining about comics not being canon on the other thread your weren't deciding what's canon or not?
Besides I already proved that my source has way more authority than your magical booklet which you can't even link.
When you provide an authoritive source that you can actual link, we can continue.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
😆 Wow, your such a hypocrite. . . When you were busy whining about comics not being canon on the other thread your weren't deciding what's canon or not?Besides I already proved that my source has way more authority than your magical booklet which you can't even link.
When you provide an authoritive source that you can actual link, we can continue.
-No, I wasn't, since I was following the rule of canon scources. You however are deciding that your "Linkable" book is worth more than the booklet that comes with the bgame simply because it's linkable? Please... Go and by the game, then judge for yourself.
-No you didn't, all you did was prove it was linkable, and some dude on Game FAQS translated it, that doesn'tprove it's ahighersource by any margin.
-Asthar, go buy the game, then you can ACTUALLY debate the topic with firsthand knowlege and not someones translated FAQ based on a source book. I don't have to provide a linkable reference at all, because, beleive it or not, not EVERYTHING finds it's way onto the net.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
-No, I wasn't, since I was following the rule of canon scources. You however are deciding that your "Linkable" book is worth more than the booklet that comes with the bgame simply because it's linkable? Please... Go and by the game, then judge for yourself.
Yes you are, you couldn't even provide a link to your source, and complained when I didn't do the same. Despite the fact I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you even had the book. Not to mention the book is not an authoritty on canon. Why would capcom mamkesource books, if the canon is easily explained in an instruction booklet.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
-No you didn't, all you did was prove it was linkable, and some dude on Game FAQS translated it, that doesn'tprove it's ahighersource by any margin.
Versus an unlinkable instruction booklet, shit your a hypocrite. Apparently your allowed not to link sources and use instruction booklets that do not even have authority on canon to debate. Whilst I can't use a tranalstion of an authoritive source book.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
-Asthar, go buy the game, then you can ACTUALLY debate the topic with firsthand knowlege and not someones translated FAQ based on a source book.
Holy shit darko, how pig headed can you get?!
If the game contained the canon, why would Capcom write dozens of source books?!
Hell, since when does the game even tell you what's canon?
You want me to trust an instruction booklet Which you cannot even F*ckin link. Yet, you will not accept a translation of a source book, do you realize how hypocritical that is?
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
I don't have to provide a linkable reference at all, because, beleive it or not, not EVERYTHING finds it's way onto the net.
That's a bullshit excuse, and you know it. So, until you can link your source your word isn't worth diddly squat.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
-No, I wasn't, since I was following the rule of canon scources. You however are deciding that your "Linkable" book is worth more than the booklet that comes with the bgame simply because it's linkable? Please... Go and by the game, then judge for yourself.-No you didn't, all you did was prove it was linkable, and some dude on Game FAQS translated it, that doesn'tprove it's ahighersource by any margin.
-Asthar, go buy the game, then you can ACTUALLY debate the topic with firsthand knowlege and not someones translated FAQ based on a source book. I don't have to provide a linkable reference at all, because, beleive it or not, not EVERYTHING finds it's way onto the net.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Yes you are, you couldn't even provide a link to your source, and complained when I didn't do the same. Despite the fact [B]I gave you the benefit of the doubt that you even had the book. Not to mention the book is not an authoritty on canon. Why would capcom mamkesource books, if the canon is easily explained in an instruction booklet.Versus an unlinkable instruction booklet, shit your a hypocrite. Apparently your allowed not to link sources and use instruction booklets that do not even have authority on canon to debate. Whilst I can't use a tranalstion of an authoritive source book.
Holy shit darko, how pig headed can you get?!
If the game contained the canon, why would Capcom write dozens of source books?!
Hell, since when does the game even tell you what's canon?
You want me to trust an instruction booklet Which you cannot even F*ckin link. Yet, you will not accept a translation of a source book, do you realize how hypocritical that is?
That's a bullshit excuse, and you know it. So, until you can link your source your word isn't worth diddly squat. [/B]
Hey guess what ?
Your both whining like bitches over a inconsequential details, who gives a flying f*ck about how her power was gained. She's an S-class demon the very top of the pile and thats all that matters.
Originally posted by grey fox
She's an S class. Her father was an S class. Belial was nigh-omnipotent. Thus Jedah (an A-class) loses.
Jedah is not an A class, he's an S class. Belail was an S plus class since he was a special case. The world of Makai was aprt of him, like an extension of his own body.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
I don't have to provide a linkable reference at all, because, beleive it or not, not EVERYTHING finds it's way onto the net.
This shows how much of a flaming hypocrite you are, I had to quote this twice because it's epic. . . Tell me darko, what's the difference between you quoting an exerpt from a instruction booklet and, Saiki quoting exerpts from several source books? You guys are doing the samething, So, what makes his word less relaible than yours?
Also, since you guys are both using the internet where "Anyone can post anything" according to you. Than your word is as good as his since anyone taking both your information seriously would have to take both your words that your being honest about sources.
But, let's pretend that your both being honest .Then guess what, he still has an authoritive source and you do not. You can't prove he's lying, just like you cannot prove your being honest. So, in the end it all comes down to trust. . .not to mention that even if your both telling the truth, his source takes much more priority over yours.
So, in the end the only way for to be right is for you to prove he's lying (If he is)
EDIT: Note that I gave you a link to the cover of "All About Vampire Hunter" which I got from a site affiliated with Saiki. They claim to have the book, and actuallly have the cover. So, right now they are more credible than you. Not to mention that even if you link your source. You would then have to prove that is a definetive source ans seiing as your using an instruction booklet that's unlikely.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
This shows how much of a flaming hypocrite you are, I had to quote this twice because it's epic. . . Tell me darko, what's the difference between you quoting an exerpt from a instruction booklet and, Saiki quoting exerpts from several source books? You guys are doing the samething, So, what makes his word less relaible than yours?Also, since you guys are both using the internet where "Anyone can post anything" according to you. Than your word is as good as his since anyone taking both your information seriously would have to take both your words that your being honest about sources.
But, let's pretend that your both being honest .Then guess what, he still has an authoritive source and you do not. You can't prove he's lying, just like you cannot prove your being honest. So, in the end it all comes down to trust. . .not to mention that even if your both telling the truth, his source takes much more priority over yours.
So, in the end the only way for to be right is for you to prove he's lying (If he is)
EDIT: Note that I gave you a link to the cover of "All About Vampire Hunter" which I got from a site affiliated with Saiki. They claim to have the book, and actuallly have the cover. So, right now they are more credible than you. Not to mention that even if you link your source. You would then have to prove that is a definetive source ans seiing as your using an instruction booklet that's unlikely.
Wait wait... so his source is Definitive and Authoritive because he can post iton the net?
WTF?!
Right... from this point on Asthar, you can go on beleiving whatever suits your fancy... I'm not going to argue canon validity when it's obvious that you'll just snap up anything you like and then continue to destroy equal or greater canon sources just because I can't scan them. You sir, really do follow at least 4 of the 10 commandments of Fanboyism.
I. Thou shalt not adhere to logic if and when it impedes the progress of your biased argument.
III. Thou shalt not admit under any circumstances that thou art lost concerning thy argument.
IV. Thou shalt use hyperbole liberally throughout thy argument.
VII. Thou shalt not respect the equally valid sources of thy opposition and should seek to destroy their credibility with extreme prejudice.
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Wait wait... so his source is Definitive and Authoritive because he can post iton the net?
Are you on crack?!
I stated that it's a definetive authority because Capcom made it to explain the canon. I've said that six times already, holy shit darko how slow can you be?
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Right... from this point on Asthar, you can go on beleiving whatever suits your fancy... I'm not going to argue canon validity when it's obvious that you'll just snap up anything you like and then continue to destroy equal or greater canon sources just because I can't scan them. You sir, really do follow at least 4 of the 10 commandments of Fanboyism.
You don't have any greater source, Darko. I've been telling you this forever now. An instruction booklet is not equal to a source book. The only reason why your arguing it is because it's convineint.Basically as long as you have something that's at your disposal it's the authority. Never mind that your word is not better than his since you cannot offer the original source, so, in the end I have to take youe word just like his. What exactly makes your word better.
Originally posted by Sado22
personally i don't see the point of being logical in a game that has been about everything BUT logic. also Capcom has some of the most retarded writers out there making up so much crap over the years.
there really is no point in being logical about it, darko.~Sado
Especially when you have a source, I've been telling this idiot that from the start.
Originally posted by Sado22Correct.
personally i don't see the point of being logical in a game that has been about everything BUT logic. also Capcom has some of the most retarded writers out there making up so much crap over the years.
there really is no point in being logical about it, darko.~Sado