The "You Know What" Thread

The poll means nothing EP, and I say that having won both of them. I accused you of making aliases because YOU are the only person out of the "10" who has posted. So they mean nothing. Add up the two polls, 7 votes in the last one, 5 here. 12, where are these 11 others? Never to be seen, ever.

Has he posted what we've all asked him to yet? Nope? Well:

Prove she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU prove in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

Come on everyone, he'll eventually have to answer one of us, and we're not doing anything wrong besides asking him to answer an on topic question.

-AC

Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
He continues to post so it seems he's still in it. Not that it does.

Again, you probably know this, but are just slingin' mud.

EP:

Prove she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU prove in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

Everyone wants you to do that.

Oh, and if we're all "done", and you're so right, why do you keep posting?

-AC

Quite embarrassing.

One day (hopefully) he'll slap his hand on his forehead and go..."Crap! I didn't even understand the point of the argument"

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
[b]Prove she's objectively good.[/B]

Originally posted by EPIIIBITES

10 people have agreed with me on this already according to the polls we've had...and that's pretty much all I expected.

THEY understand the concept that you fail to...

THERE DOESN'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO BE PROOF FOR SOMETHING TO ACUTALLY EXIST!

THEY GET THIS.

YOU DON'T.

Just keep embarrassing yourself AC. Keep asking your pointless question.

What a character.

You have absolutely nothing besides "I believe the truth exists.", literally nothing beyond that, and you need more considering you are trying to make us agree and tell us we're wrong.

It's sad that you've voted for yourself 12 times. Unless those people come forward, they don't matter. What matters is what has happened in the threads, and you have been defeated.

So I'll ask you again:

Prove she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU prove in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

I DO have a question for you, if you won't answer that one;

If we're so wrong, if you "know" you're right and you are satisfied that 10 "people" agree, that we never will, and that we will always reply and refute anything you say, why are you still posting?

Will you at least answer that one?

-AC

He's gone mad.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Prove she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU prove in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

-"There doesn't necessarily have to be proof for something to be true in reality" (see argument)

What a total pest.

Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
He's gone mad.x 20

-"There doesn't necessarily have to be proof for something to be true" (see argument)

What a total pest.

For something to be true it has to be falsifiable, your theory is not, as you use the same answer which lacks evidence to back it. No matter what argument is raised.
Your theory is not true, it's a theory that's all, and a bad one at that.

Isn't it annoying? Yeah. Now imagine how it feels to see a wrong argument and post pasted 90 times a day, when you have explained why it's wrong. I've edited the request;

Show us how you believe she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU show us in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

You will have to answer sooner or later, and remember, ONE POST.

So in summation, you have as follows:

1 x Claim that there is an objective truth.

0 x Pieces of evidence.

0 x Ways of proving it.

0 x Credible suggestions or ideas as to why it exists.

4 x Threads consisting of "I JUST believe the truth exists, but it does, and you all need to agree with me or you're wrong and don't get it.", but getting beat.

You fail to see why this means you should stop.

So, we move on to my next question, seeing as you won't adhered to the topic request:

Why do you keep posting if you "know" you're "right", we're "wrong", and "10 people" agree with you? What is your goal in this thread?

Answer one of the two.

-AC

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
For something to be true it has to be falsifiable, your theory is not, as you use the same answer which lacks evidence to back it. No matter what argument is raised.
Your theory is not true, it's a theory that's all, and a bad one at that.

So you're saying the earth IS NOT round because there is no proof (according to people many years ago). God DOES NOT exist because there is no proof.

Things can be true in reality independant of facts or proof.

Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
Changed it to be more specific for you.

So you're saying the earth IS NOT round because there is no proof (according to people many years ago). God DOES NOT exist because there is no proof.

Things can be true in reality independant of facts or proof.

But a claim that there's a truth cannot be taken seriously in this day and age without facts or proof.

That's irrelevant, focus on your point; There's a universal truth that objectively good and crap music exists. You cannot prove it, have no evidence, have nothing outside of personal faith, ergo your debate is worthless.

I'll ask you again, answer one of these:

Show us how you believe she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU show us in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

or

Why do you keep posting if you "know" you're "right", we're "wrong", and "10 people" agree with you? What is your goal in this thread?

I'm asking you simple, civil questions. If you won't answer me, I'll just ask others to ask you. You're being rude.

-AC

Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
So you're saying the earth IS NOT round because there is no proof (according to people many years ago). God DOES NOT exist because there is no proof. Things can be true in reality apart from facts.

No I'm not saying the earth is not round, at the time that was falsifiable as every conceivable way of proving it wrong failed. It was therefore felt to be right. I'm not getting into a discussion about God, as that's faith and followers argue they need no proof. I'll use an example for you to understand how your theory is not falsifiable. It's much like me saying I've got a football team, that are really, really good, but, we haven't haven't won any matches. See the problem here, you can try as you might to say that my team is not good, but I can always say, yes we are we have great players. It's much like you, as although you have no actual evidence you can jump on the back foot and start ranting about how truths are generally accepted as facts. And, how you know you're right so we don't matter.

And don't use that as a means to ignore my post, EP.

-AC

Why wouldn't I? It's a decent attempt at discussion. Just like Ptse's point was.

You're just a pest.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
-"It's much like me saying I've got a football team, that are really, really good, but, we haven't haven't won any matches. See the problem here, you can try as you might to say that my team is not good, but I can always say, yes we are we have great players"

But "good" and "crap" in music terms isn't measured by something like points. So it's not really comparable.

I'm civilly asking you on topic questions, you ignore them cos you're afraid of me. Quality of music can't be measured either, not outside of technicality, which isn't what we're discussing. We all have our own ways of gauging what's good and bad, subjectively.

Can we stop discussing everything except music?

EP:

Show us how you believe she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU show us in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

or

Why do you keep posting if you "know" you're "right", we're "wrong", and "10 people" agree with you? What is your goal in this thread?

I'm asking you nicely.

-AC

I've answered you nicely.

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Show us how you believe she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU show us in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

Now please go away

You haven't answered me, you've replied.

If you spent more time answering my questions as best you can or adhering to my requests than you do replying and moaning, we'd have a smoother thread. I'll ask you until you answer, I'm doing nothing wrong, you have done the exact same thing but with ignorance and rude nature, I'm at least being nice.

Show us how you believe she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU show us in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.

or

Why do you keep posting if you "know" you're "right", we're "wrong", and "10 people" agree with you? What is your goal in this thread?

I'm not being mean to you, I'm asking you politely to answer one or both.

I edited the first one because you have no way to prove it, so you can just give me your reasoning in a post that isn't 5 in a row, buried in needless ranting. Just one post.

-AC

Your argument was not an argument, it was you saying 'it's true but it can't be proved', 'I believe it because I know'. Bollocks, you've lost, you know you have and that's why you're giving up. EDIT: Directed at EPIIIBITES

I just replied to you...I didn't give up

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Show us how you believe she's objectively good. Not quotes, not reviews, they prove nothing but opinion. YOU show us in your own words why she's objectively good, either a song or her music in general, in one post.[/B]

Really immature you.

But you'll spend time pasting everything else 90 times?

At least repaste in ONE POST the one part that answers my request.

Or, answer this question:

Why do you keep posting if you "know" you're "right", we're "wrong", and "10 people" agree with you? What is your goal in this thread?

That's one I really want answered. If you are so convinced you've won and we're all wrong/don't get it, why are you here?

-AC