Originally posted by AngryManatee
No, that isn't the what's at stake here. You're claiming that what these people claim to have experienced is true, so what is it that is so special about their case that makes their story more believable than someone who believes they've been abducted and experimented on? These abductees have vivd memories about their abductions, so what makes their story any different from these people who have had experiences with demons?Nice try with the whole philisophical turnaround there, but I'm not the one who is up for questioning, and the fact that you're immediately resorting to this kind of tactic so early on in this silly thread leads me to think that I'm only going to get nothing but lame excuses and verses as answers.
Edit: Why are you asking people if they can handle the truth? You already have another thread for that topic (which coincidentally should be titled "Can you handle the opinion?"😉
I never said anything about their story being more believeable than an alien abduction case--you did. I never said that their story was more believeable either--that was all you. I never said that their stories were different from an alien abduction--again that was all you.
I simply presented their experiences.
What philosophical turnaround, could you be more specific? Well, can you handle the Truth? What is so difficult about reading about someone's experience and then afterwards considering what you just read? Why does anything that contradicts your belief system or previous experience have to be so problematic? If I had told you that these people were abducted by aliens you would probably believe that hook, line, sinker, the fisherman, the boat, and his boots--all without question.
😄