Spider-Man 4 Villain

A few to many villains there, also where is mysterio a classic villain, older then many of them june 1964. Man I own a first edition of that took me ages to track that down, just like a first print of 300.

i say
spiderman:green goblin
spiderman 2:dr octopus
spiderman 3😖andman, new goblin and venom
spiderman 4: carnage, the lizard and toxin {hero}
spiderman 5: carnage, scorpion and rhino
spiderman 6: spider carnage, hobgoblin,and kraven the hunter
spiderman 7: mysterio, vulture, electro,

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
i say
spiderman:green goblin
spiderman 2:dr octopus
spiderman 3😖andman, new goblin and venom
spiderman 4: carnage, the lizard and toxin {hero}
spiderman 5: carnage, scorpion and rhino
spiderman 6: spider carnage, hobgoblin,and kraven the hunter
spiderman 7: mysterio, vulture, electro,

Won't work.

1. Having 3 villains in a movie will make it rushed.

2. I doubt Toxin would make an appearance the same time Carnage does.

3. Some of those villains are boring and/or doubtful in being in a Spiderman movie.

The current contract only goes up to 6, and more classic villains are deserving of the big screen.

Like Oh I don't know Mysterio, also Carnage is not family material.
and if Venom was never meant to be in 3, because of lack of hummanity, well good luck with Carnage.

carnage gave birth to toxin

Originally posted by Neo Darkhalen
The current contract only goes up to 6, and more classic villains are deserving of the big screen.

Like Oh I don't know Mysterio, also Carnage is not family material.
and if Venom was never meant to be in 3, because of lack of hummanity, well good luck with Carnage.

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
carnage gave birth to toxin

DUH!!!

Do you think that Carnage will make an appearance and give birth in the same movie?

If Sam Raimi didn't like Venom, what makes you think he'll put Carnage in a movie?

There's no need in you answering those questions because your answer wouldn't matter.

Carnage is very unlikely to be in a Spiderman movie because he's too violent for a family film.

You obsession with him is pointless.

im telling you carnage gave birth to toxin... the producer said toxin will be in the movie. but he also said without carnage. thats imposable because carnage gave birth to toxin!!!argue

Carnage is pointless, think about it now that marvel have regained there fortune, after near bankruptcy what has happened to Carnage, ripped apart marvel is done with him and he is no longer required.

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
the producer said toxin will be in the movie. but he also said without carnage.

Who was the "producer" that said it?

Who cares what the producer said, I will believe it when the executive producer, Director and Sony say it.

Sam Raimi

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
Sam Raimi

Oh, really?

Do you have the link to the site in which he says it?

no

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
im telling you carnage gave birth to toxin... the producer said toxin will be in the movie. but he also said without carnage. thats imposable because carnage gave birth to toxin!!!argue

Carnage, Not really possible since Venom is better....

dude venom is dead... hes not coming back.

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
dude venom is dead... hes not coming back.

Jr has a dad by the same name so it would be a buyable, easy way to bring back Venom.

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
no

Then you should be quiet if you can't back up anything that you say.

Originally posted by maxcarnage1011
dude venom is dead... hes not coming back.

If that was true, then Carnage would never exist in the movies.

Never know, either way he is dead in the comics and the film, but if you look at my plot for 4 you can see how venom could be kept alive.