Should Carnage be in a future Spider-man film?

I am against carnage being in spider-man because it's PG-13 and he'd suck unless they make it R rated whih won't happen because Sony would lose money cause not so many peopele would be able to see it...some people seem to think he will be in it and that Carngae would work in a PG-13, so lets settle this in one thread rather than all the threads...should Carnage be in a future spider-man film?

It depends. If Sam Raimi can find some way to make Carnage less blood-thirsty, then he can be in the movie. Rather than killing people, Carnage could just be destructive and destroy buildings or something. I don't know...

But Carnage is all about killing people in violent and slow painful ways, not destroying buildings...it's a good idea, but it wouldn't work, fans would want carnage too be violent and blood thirsty

he can kill people like doc ock killed those doctors. they can hint to gruesome death scenes without really showing them.

This is 50/50 question. Sam Raimi must find some sort of way to keep a PG-13 rating as well as keep the Carnage fans happy. Sam Raimi is the right man for the job. He can certainly have Carnage on screen and keep the same Spiderman rating.

You sure, he f*cked venom up, but to be fair he did have to add venom in at the last minute

i dont think raimi really effed venom up that bad, maybe a little bit with the voice, but other than that i think venom was fine. it was eddie brock that raimi mostly effed up on

Yer but also he didn't get enough screen time, I wanted him to totally pwn Pete but there wasn't really alot of that. I liked he Venom scream, that was done well...he kinda sounded abit like a bird though...but the voice was all wrong,I agree with that

I liked the way Venom turned out in part 3. I already knew Venom wasn't going to the way he is i the comics. So I accepted him as I was watching the movie.

But the voice sucked

Originally posted by atharpina
he can kill people like doc ock killed those doctors. they can hint to gruesome death scenes without really showing them.

Agreed or something like in Sin City were the asian girl killed all those guys in black and white

Originally posted by steverules
But the voice sucked

Venom voice in Spiderman 3 didn't suck. His voice was great. It was both creepy and scary.

No it was Topher Grace's voice and it sucked and didn't sound creepy

It didn't suck. His voice was just right. Venom's voice doesn't need to be deep and distorted.

What!?! Yes it does, your the first person I've met who liked his voice, I wanted creepy not Topher Grace

Originally posted by steverules
But the voice sucked

Yeah but how bad@$$ did you think his voice was going to be? Venom was cool in 3 and this movie wasn't really about Venom but more or less Spider-man dealing with the Venom symbiote.

Back to the topic please

Look carnage is more violent that Ock, what Ock did in 2 would be nothing compared to what carnage does, Ock doesn't like to kill people where as Carnage e loves it and he does it in a way you could only have in a nightmare...carnage wouldn't work in a spider-man film...they'd probably mess his voice up as well

Originally posted by steverules
Look carnage is more violent that Ock, what Ock did in 2 would be nothing compared to what carnage does, Ock doesn't like to kill people where as Carnage e loves it and he does it in a way you could only have in a nightmare...carnage wouldn't work in a spider-man film...they'd probably mess his voice up as well

Maybe, maybe not. It really depends on who plays Carnage/Cletus Kasady. They could always imply that Carnage is killing and yet not show it kind of how the Mummy showed the pharoh and others being killed and yet it's not on the screen.

Yeah but carnage kills loadsa people they can't do that for every scene