Maul vs. Mundi

I think Maul is underestimated, he was a freaking Sith Lord, an apprentice to Sidious, who only takes the best, who have huge potential. Mundi just showed more, that doesn't mean he is better with the Force.

He was a freaking Sith Lord!

So? In an order of two being a Sith Lord isn't really anything special. It's just a title. It's like people saying Lotr > Starwars because gandalf is a god or some sh*t liek that. Titles don't mean anything. Besides, Mundi was a "freaking" Council Member. A much harder feat to attain.

And two can use the "absence of proof isn't proof of absence (Which it is proof, actually.)

I think C-3PO > Maul. Just because we haven't seen any showings of C-3PO's pwnge doesn't mean he doesn't.

I'm not sure about this one.