Magus (Technarchy) vs Galactus

Started by joesdabest12 pages

Magus (Technarchy) vs Galactus

Magus Technarchy (Google Him) / I can't post Links 馃槵

Vs.

Medium Fed Galactus

Who wins? 馃檨

What are Magus going to do, outgrow him? - Lol

Im not sure what Magus could do but I think the Magus has been able to throw a star. Pretty powerful but im not sure if he can handle Big G.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magus_(comics)#Magus_.28Technarchy.29

Ya Magus has the power to split a star in half if i read correctly.

Originally posted by joesdabest1
Ya Magus has the power to split a star in half if i read correctly.

Which should mean nothing to Galactus.

Big G for the win.

Splitting a star in half? You need a lot more then that to beat Galactus.

Wiki says he does stuff on par with Galactus.

Thats all the proof I need 馃槃

Re: Magus (Technarchy) vs Galactus

Originally posted by joesdabest1
Magus Technarchy (Google Him) / I can't post Links 馃槵

Vs.

Medium Fed Galactus

Who wins? 馃檨

g

wiki is always right 馃槢

Originally posted by celestialdemon
Which should mean nothing to Galactus.

Big G for the win.

Ok but doesnt Big G eat planets to stay alive? Arent some stars bigger than planets?

Originally posted by Alfheim
Ok but doesnt Big G eat planets to stay alive? Arent some stars bigger than planets?

There's a difference between eating a planet and destroying it. Galactus could easily destroy planets if he wanted to. He just eats them for their energy.

And Galactus has the power to destroy countless stars. Ripping a star in half is nothing to him.

Originally posted by celestialdemon
There's a difference between eating a planet and destroying it. Galactus could easily destroy planets if he wanted to. He just eats them for their energy.

And Galactus has the power to destroy countless stars. Ripping a star in half is nothing to him.

Galactus needs to be fed by Gravity 馃槢

Magus was said to render a star in half. Galactus when he 'died' was a star

I don't even know if Magus has returned

big g for the big win.

Agree as for throwing a star Galactus has shown that he is capable of easily making a star go nova and after that survive the explosion so...

be interesting to see if magus could infect g with the virus. given many of g's showings, i'd say it was certainly possible.

Perhaps he would succed but is that before ore after he has been blasted to dust 馃槈

I didn't really understand the way that virus worked, was is physical ore how was it that he transfered the virus???

it was simply an infection that transforms orgainic matter into techno-organic matter. g IS a physical being so he could be vulnerable to the attack. if he was, magus would then simply drain him and kill him.

blasting magus to dust would not be an easy thing, given magus's OWN energy abilities.

magus could definitely take out a weak g (who can't? 馃槵 ). it would take at least an average g to beat him.

Originally posted by leonidas
it was simply an infection that transforms orgainic matter into techno-organic matter. g IS a physical being so he could be vulnerable to the attack. if he was, magus would then simply drain him and kill him.

blasting magus to dust would not be an easy thing, given magus's OWN energy abilities.

magus could definitely take out a weak g (who can't? 馃槵 ). it would take at least an average g to beat him.

Actually its fifthy fifthy physical and abstract.

Yet I wouldn't put that energy ability above a medium fed Galactus.

Yes how cannot take out a weak Galactus 馃檨 but the weak also have some good showings like when being severely weak and still destroying atleast three starsystems.

50/50? where'd you hear that? proof? galactus is a physical being -- entirely. he's not at all an abstract entity . . .

Originally posted by leonidas
50/50? where'd you hear that? proof? galactus is a physical being -- entirely. he's not at all an abstract entity . . .
http://img293.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sue2020011yo1.jpg

good scan, bran, but it says nothing about him being an abstract. his 'true' form is a silly star, which is to say he's a being of energy. that's a world different from saying he is an abstract.

http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=q2iw8.jpg