sbp vs darkseid

Originally posted by panthergod
There is no proof that he was dead.

this is a lie.

This is your laughably weak magination at work only. there was ZERO indication that Doomsday was dead for all you know he was KO'd.

Actually, that story made a point to show that Doomsday DIDN'T need to die to adapt to an attack.

So you're wrong.

Again.

Hey, idiot, it could also mean that [b]he was suprised that Doomsday survived the blast.

fool.

Says the punk who is a proven liar about virtually every single comic he ever tried to cite about Darksied.

Kid, you're not fooling anyone with a brain.

Why don't you go ahead a give the comic where it was sated that that was an 'avatar', again, as you claimed. 😆

You're here for my amusment, son. Nothing more. [/B]

First off, when have you seen me say that that was an avatar? please pull up the quote. I have always summised that DS beat Doomsday FIrST. this has been my argument from day one. So I guess you dind't do your homework. Secondly It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that Doomsday died and came back. DS monologue suggest as much. And the fact that DS did what the guardian could not and survived is all the proof I need that he killed DS. You know reading is very subjective. You should take a class on writing. They tell you this when you take fiction writing. I see one thing, you see another. I do not value your opinion on the matter nor do you value mine. So get over it.

Originally posted by darthgoober
nvr now I want you to think about something, if you can't think of an example of DS being bloodlusted(meaning that he wants to fight) and fighting to what you consider "his max", then that means that IT'S NOT PART OF HIS CHARACTER. If he's NEVER done it, then it's not in character for him to do it now. All you can go by is the levels that he HAS been shown at.

The only time I've seen DS really like evil and bloodlusted was in GDS. and He used every thing he had in him. Every other time, He hasn't really needed to fight, he just zaps and that is the end of the fight.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
First off, when have you seen me say that that was an avatar? please pull up the quote. I have always summised that DS beat Doomsday FIrST. this has been my argument from day one. So I guess you dind't do your homework. Secondly It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that Doomsday died and came back. DS monologue suggest as much. And the fact that DS did what the guardian could not and survived is all the proof I need that he killed DS. You know reading is very subjective. You should take a class on writing. They tell you this when you take fiction writing. I see one thing, you see another. I do not value your opinion on the matter nor do you value mine. So get over it.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
The only time I've seen DS really like evil and bloodlusted was in GDS. and He used every thing he had in him. Every other time, He hasn't really needed to fight, he just zaps and that is the end of the fight.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Actually nvr, the on panel evidence regarding whether or not DD actually died is pretty vague do to a poor artistic depiction of the event. But the writer later said that it WAS meant for DD to survive the OE, rather than come back from it. Normally I don't take interviews and such seriously, but since he just clarified what they meant to portray in that scene I think it's pretty valid.

As i remember, the writer said that more often than not, it was to show that DS would take the majority against Doomsday. But if the writer said that DD survived it, that could mean he didn't get erased. Which we all know he didn't. I still think he died. Unless somethign was wrong with DS godly senses.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
As i remember, the writer said that more often than not, it was to show that DS would take the majority against Doomsday. But if the writer said that DD survived it, that could mean he didn't get erased. Which we all know he didn't. I still think he died. Unless somethign was wrong with DS godly senses.

Originally posted by darthgoober
They ask if he thought Supes could resist the OE the way that DD did and he said yes. So unless Supes was being written as coming back from the dead in an evolved form, he meant that DD just survived it. It may have caused him major damage and dazed or stunned him, but he survived.

Of course Superman Survives the OE. In all these years he's never gotten killed from it. He's been hurt tho. he was once hurt just being near the OE. Meh. We could both be right. At any rate, DS was able to knock out, kill, or stop doomsday's assault. Something a guardian couldn't do and cost him his life for his effort. Does SBP have the same protection as superman or DD? that is next question.

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Does SBP have the same protection as superman or DD? that is next question.

Originally posted by darthgoober
I think it's safe to say that SBP is a fair share more durable than Supes.

I dont' think Superman's Durability has anything to do with the OE. he's gotten hurt from it just being around it. And he's gotten teleported away many times. And SBP does seem durable then sometimes not. Krypto Made himbleed. Can he do that to clark? I don't know. At any rate, a mind assualt on such a weak mind should do the trick huh?

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
As i remember, the writer said that more often than not, it was to show that DS would take the majority against Doomsday. But if the writer said that DD survived it, that could mean he didn't get erased. Which we all know he didn't. I still think he died. Unless somethign was wrong with DS godly senses.

HEY, FOLKS!

Yet again, nvr is LYING.

http://www.comicboards.com/jurgens-rc.php

RC: So, in your opinion, if Darkseid fought Doomsday without employing technology and strategy, Doomsday would win every time?

DAN JURGENS:Yes. Right.

http://www.comicboards.com/jurgens2-rc.php

RC: What bothered people the most was when I asked you, if he had no preparation and no technology in a drag-out fight, would Darkseid lose every time to Doomsday, and you said "yes." That just . . . pissed people off.

Dan Jurgens: Oh, okay.

RC: Do you want to change your answer?

Dan Jurgens: Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh . . .

No.

Kid, you really should get a handle on this pathilogical lying problem you have

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
I dont' think Superman's Durability has anything to do with the OE. he's gotten hurt from it just being around it. And he's gotten teleported away many times. And SBP does seem durable then sometimes not. Krypto Made himbleed. Can he do that to clark? I don't know. At any rate, a mind assualt on such a weak mind should do the trick huh?

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
I dont' think Superman's Durability has anything to do with the OE. he's gotten hurt from it just being around it. And he's gotten teleported away many times. And SBP does seem durable then sometimes not. Krypto Made himbleed. Can he do that to clark? I don't know. At any rate, a mind assualt on such a weak mind should do the trick huh?

His durabulilty has plenty to do with it, seeing as thats why Darkseid failed to kill him with numerous all out full pwoer blasts of the Omega Effect.

Originally posted by darthgoober
But again, it's not really in character for DS to use a mind blast on someone when bloodlusted.

What if he's trying to win against a person who has a clear weakness in that department?

Originally posted by darthgoober
Unfortunately, the GDS is an invalid example due to it being thousands of years in the future. A character can change A LOT in that amount of time, so you're going to have to try again.

Originally posted by panthergod
HEY, FOLKS!

Yet again, nvr is [b]LYING.

http://www.comicboards.com/jurgens-rc.php

http://www.comicboards.com/jurgens2-rc.php

Kid, you really should get a handle on this pathilogical lying problem you have [/B]

I didn't read that article. That isn't even the article. Stop finding shit and then saying someone is lying becuz of info you just found and dind't even ask if I read it. Idiot. You look like a lame who has nothing better to do. If you were going to do it, you would have asked what was said in the article that I saw. clearly that isn't it, becuz I would have never taken the time to read that whole article.as it is, I dind't read it that time. I had to skim thru it to know what the hell you were talking about. Chump.

Originally posted by starking
Yet he was supposed to be, ALOT weaker.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
What if he's trying to win against a person who has a clear weakness in that department?

Originally posted by darthgoober
In his own words "Honor demands hand to hand combat".

For Superman. he doesn't have that grudge against anyone else does he? Does he even think Super boy prime is worthy of honor?

Originally posted by darthgoober
In his own words "Honor demands hand to hand combat".

When was this?

Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
For Superman. he doesn't have that grudge against anyone else does he? Does he even think Super boy prime is worthy of honor?