K.O.S.M.O.S. vs Pyron

Originally posted by IdiotGod
Alright then, my visionary fellow.
Tell me the distance between Pyron and Andromeda.

He was killed in the original timeline.
Oh and that sort of thing means nothing in these threads.

long behind him, if its even there, like Makai was there, then suddenly Andromeda, its likely not even there at all, his thinking about them

There is only one timeline because time is immutable, which means it cannot be changed, he was always meant to die, show me him being killed in the "original" timeline as you say, theres no such thing as "original timeline", since theres really just one and yes it does, if the status is around a character and its excistence, thats like saying magic doesn matter because its invisible or we cant see its forces.

Pyron…

Why have the very same threads been bumped twice?

Originally posted by IdiotGod
No, it shows Pyron right near Andromeda...there's no large distance or anything.

This shows Master Chief right near Earth...there's no large distance or anything.

Been over this.
Your analogy fails.

So does yours

yeh weve all been over it 100 times before you even started foolishly trying to debate Pyron as Galaxy sized

I'm still waiting for someone to prove there's a large distance between Pyron and Andromeda.
Though i suspect there will be no proof forthcoming from "debaters" such as yourselves.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
I'm still waiting for someone to prove there's a large distance between Pyron and Andromeda.
Though i suspect there will be no proof forthcoming from "debaters" such as yourselves.

Do you have any proof that he is near it? Because that is primary objective in any debate. Prove that he IS, before others have to prove that he isnt.
Though I suspect there will be no proof forthcoming from debaters such as yourself.

Do you have any proof that he is near it? Because that is primary objective in any debate. Prove that he IS, before others have to prove that he isnt.

Proof besides the obvious visual fact he's near it?

you just asked for proof, your video is the proof 🙂, the obvious visual fact hes just thinking about it, not there, he doesnt float across the screen from Makai to standing right next to a non moving image of the andromeda galaxy, you fail so much haha

No. It is called distance perspective. I tried finding the post where it was disproven but unfortunatly I could not.

Now, there is this called distance perspective. If a camera is at closeup on a person, the background in the picture will look a lot smaller while the person will look a lot larger. I have a picture of myself being larger than my bed.

I have a big bed.

the obvious visual fact hes just thinking about it, not there, he doesnt float across the screen from Makai to standing right next to a non moving image of the andromeda galaxy, you fail so much haha

Well, for starters, galaxies don't really move. They rotate IIRC but it takes millions or billions of years.

And he's visibly moving. So, where exactly do you have the proof he isn't going from one place to the other?

Now, there is this called distance perspective. If a camera is at closeup on a person, the background in the picture will look a lot smaller while the person will look a lot larger. I have a picture of myself being larger than my bed.

I have a big bed.

Except they didn't closeup on Pyron..his proportion in the screen is fairly even with that of the images of other things.

Prove that they did not. Because I will hold "distance perspective" as my proof. It is valid enough until you disprove it.

Ask a mod.

because Makai and Andromeda Earth universe are diffrent dimensions, Pyron for one hasnt shown he can go through dimensions in the first place and second you would have to be completly idiotic (lol hmm) to belive that he is moving from a dimension, to another in the same "thinking" pose which he stays in the whole time and gives more to the reasoning he isnt even in any of those places, you fail....

yeh the other things like the makai people being destroyed, so i gues your saying he is changing size as well as he goes from one place to the other, or the people being destroyed in Makai are also all galaxy sized lmao...

because Makai and Andromeda Earth universe are diffrent dimensions, Pyron for one hasnt shown he can go through dimensions in the first place

Then how the hell is he looking at and talking about Makai if he can't travel there?

and second you would have to be completly idiotic (lol hmm) to belive that he is moving from a dimension, to another in the same "thinking" pose which he stays in the whole time and gives more to the reasoning he isnt even in any of those places, you fail....

He's moving around and talking about what he sees in Makai...he's observing it.
That's like, bovious to the tenth degree.

yeh the other things like the makai people being destroyed, so i gues your saying he is changing size as well as he goes from one place to the other, or the people being destroyed in Makai are also all galaxy sized lmao...

Eh?

Originally posted by Diamond Kisses
[b]Prove that they did not. Because I will hold "distance perspective" as my proof. It is valid enough until you disprove it.

Ask a mod. [/B]

That is a valid form of debating and a valid hand of cards in argumenting.. He has to prove it before you have to disprove it.. So, unless he can bring more proof than a very eligable picture, you're currently holding the better cards..

So you have appointed yourself the judge of this debate.
How quaint.

I don't have to prove anything. I have the picture of him right there with Andromeda. If you say it's inaccurate, the burden of proof is on you to show how.

Originally posted by IdiotGod
So you have appointed yourself the judge of this debate.
How quaint.

I don't have to prove anything. I have the picture of him right there with Andromeda. If you say it's inaccurate, the burden of proof is on you to show how.

It is not judging.. It is common sense..

Now disprove me..

That's relative.