30 takes per scene and i saw glimpses of hermione!

Started by Punkyhermy2 pages

30 takes per scene and i saw glimpses of hermione!

i'm shocked.

for the first time ever. there was some semblance of a hermione on screen.

FTW!!!

IT TOOK WB 4 FILMS TO GET POTTER RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

๐Ÿ˜ฑ

okies.

i'm gonna go sleep now.

๐Ÿ’ƒ

I hate her. ๐Ÿ˜

That movie kicked ass.

Not literally, in case Kram3r gets any ideas.

hermione or ms.twatson?

ms. twatson as you so lovingly put it ๐Ÿ˜‚

Originally posted by Barker
That movie kicked ass.

Not literally, in case Kram3r gets any ideas.

False. No Quidditch and no Ron jealousy, etc. 13jockey

Originally posted by Barker
That movie kicked ass.

Not literally, in case Kram3r gets any ideas.

i saw the broomed wizards flying over london.

and thought, THIS is magic.

THIS is HARRY POTTER!!

๐Ÿ˜ฑ

phenomenal.

4 films.

30 takes per scene for ms. twatson.

and the end result leaves a very happy punkyhermy.๐Ÿ˜‰

Originally posted by silver_tears
False. No Quidditch and no Ron jealousy, etc. 13jockey

no weasley is our king either.๐Ÿ˜ฌ

but meh....i left the theatre a happy muggle.
๐Ÿ˜Š

I was happy because the twins are adorable, one's much better looking than the other, and I have no idea which is which really, but can tell when they're on screen.

And Ron's a bit of a studd too. hmm

Originally posted by silver_tears
ms. twatson as you so lovingly put it ๐Ÿ˜‚

she's earned my hate well over the years too yes.๐Ÿ˜›

ron and herm had chemistry in this too!
๐Ÿ˜Š

ginny was adorable.

and dan rad!

wow. he CAN act. He WAS harry. i teared in many instances. he played up harry's vulnerabilities very well.๐Ÿ‘†

Originally posted by silver_tears
ms. twatson as you so lovingly put it ๐Ÿ˜‚
Mrs. TWATson.....hehehehe

Originally posted by Barker
That movie kicked ass.

Not literally, in case Kram3r gets any ideas.

I don't like kicking ass, I like to f*ck it, WTF? haermm

Originally posted by Punkyhermy
i saw the broomed wizards flying over london.

and thought, THIS is magic.

THIS is HARRY POTTER!!

๐Ÿ˜ฑ

phenomenal.

4 films.

30 takes per scene for ms. twatson.

and the end result leaves a very happy punkyhermy.๐Ÿ˜‰


30 takes?
Originally posted by silver_tears
False. No Quidditch and no Ron jealousy, etc. 13jockey

Nothing pleases you but Lethal, skank. mhm

Harry Potter sucks. herbnone

Originally posted by Bloigen
Harry Potter sucks. herbnone

I can honestly say that this was probably the worst made Harry Potter of them all. And I really like the movie.

It was the longest book, but the shortest movie. They left WAAAY too much detail out of the movie. It was way way way too choppy.

Just got back, movie was shit. GoF was much better. Slow, irrelevant plot details...like by the time Hagrid appeared, it was like...'Well..so what?'. The plot had moved along too far for me to care about minor things like Grawp. Umbridge scenes were the best ones only because they seemed straight out of the book. The effects were sweet but the climax of the film was shit, over in 5mins. And afterwards its like it didnt even happen, there was no emotion from the characters at all. Wtf....you just fought Death Eaters, lost Sirius, fought Voldemort....and they carry on like its a normal Saturday afternoon...'want me to help look for your shoes?'. F*ck sake. Poor film.

Originally posted by silver_tears
False. No Quidditch

Damn straight.

Merlin would kick Potter's a$$ ๐Ÿ˜›

Originally posted by Barker

Nothing pleases you but Lethal, skank. mhm

Not my fault I'm that good.forgetu

Originally posted by PITT_HAPPENS
Merlin would lick Potter's a$$. tongue12

lookaround