Sharpe James Indicted--But what's his political affiliation?

Originally posted by FeceMan
Are you retarded?

BECAUSE ITS IRRELEVANT

f*ck sake.

You fail at life.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Actually, the intent of posting was to demonstrate that the Associated Press somehow forgot to mention James's political affiliation.

But, anyhow, it's nice to know that any corrupt Republican is immediately crucified on KMC while corrupt Democrats are dismissed.

Yes

Originally posted by Mišt
BECAUSE ITS IRRELEVANT

f*ck sake.

Not when you consider the amount of times people bash fox news for not giving the correct information about political affiliation when it's irrelevant to their crimes. So in that way he has a point, the political affiliation of this guy should have been mentioned. After all what's the use of saying some politician is corrupt if you don't even say who put that politician in power.

Corrupt Democrats?

Unheard of.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Actually, the intent of posting was to demonstrate that the Associated Press somehow forgot to mention James's political affiliation.

But, anyhow, it's nice to know that any corrupt Republican is immediately crucified on KMC while corrupt Democrats are dismissed.

The corrupt Republicans who are immediately crucified on KMC are the one who are hypocrites like State Rep. Bob Allen who sponsored bills in Florida to tighten the state prohibition on public sex and amend the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage, only to be arrested for solicting sex from an undecover police officer in a public washroom.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Wikipedia.

you are aware that he is a state senator, right? (40 total in NJ) you're going to have to come up with something better.

Originally posted by Schecter
you are aware that he is a state senator, right? (40 total in NJ) you're going to have to come up with something better.

You're not dead..... Yay!

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
The corrupt Republicans who are immediately crucified on KMC are the one who are hypocrites like State Rep. Bob Allen who sponsored bills in Florida to tighten the state prohibition on public sex and amend the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage, only to be arrested for solicting sex from an undecover police officer in a public washroom.

"According to police, the park was under surveillance today by a detail of undercover Titusville police officers. Officers noticed Allen acting suspicious as he went in and out of the men’s restroom three times. Minutes later, he solicited an undercover male officer inside the restroom, offering to perform oral sex for $20."

http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/BREAKINGNEWS/70711036

LOL... 20 dollars.

see? he's doing his part to stimulate the ecomony and not overtax

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, actually it's usually corrupt pastors that break all 10 commandments at the same time.

Originally posted by Strangelove
That's quite difficult, if you think about it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That's why it makes the headlines.

Originally posted by Schecter
you are aware that he is a state senator, right? (40 total in NJ) you're going to have to come up with something better.

State Rep. Bob Allen was arrested Wednesday after offering to perform oral sex for $20 on an undercover male police officer, authorities said.

Veteran's Memorial Park was under surveillance when Allen, R-Merritt Island, was seen coming in and out of a restroom three times, Lt. Todd Hutchinson said

George Michael all over again.

from same wiki article (not exactly superficial)

"The Republican state representative is co-chair of Republican Sen. John McCain's preseidential campaign in Florida."

Not the point. The point is, they didn't mention James's political affiliation despite them mentioning "Republican" in the second paragraph of the other article of an individual whose position was analogous to James's.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Not the point. The point is, they didn't mention James's political affiliation despite them mentioning "Republican" in the second paragraph of the other article of an individual whose position was analogous to James's.

because there is no partisan controversy in this case, as opposed to some who works for a presidential canidacy. so yes, it is very much the point. you honstly want to try to sell the idea that an article wouldnt mention his partisanship if this guy was working for clinton or edwards? dont be so obtuse.