Scientific theory and scientific method: Are they applicable to God?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Which is why the Pope was right to declare that these "cults" if you will were not real churches.

I would be happy if the pope could rein in these trouble makers.

Originally posted by King Kandy

By the way, I'm glad you noticed that Christians have NEVER killed anyone.

Jesus certianly didn't. Well, not in his short tenure in flesh. 😉

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You didn't experiment in that. You observed, made a biased decision, declared it true and claimed to have made a proof.

That's not science. Hell thats not even logic.

Many experiments have already been conducted and many experiments are being conducted.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Jesus certianly didn't. Well, not in his short tenure in flesh. 😉

👆 👆 👆 👆 👆

Every other religious leader has.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why do you feel that I am evil?

Because you get onto this forum and disrespect everyone who does not believe like you do. You have no respect for how other people believe.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Many experiments have already been conducted and many experiments are being conducted.

That doesn't change jack shit about what I said.

You made a claim, failed to support it and used it to draw a conclusion.

Thats just stupid.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Many experiments have already been conducted and many experiments are being conducted.

Evolution: "Many experiments have already been conducted and many experiments are being conducted."

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I would be happy if the pope could rein in these trouble makers.

Sadly these "churches" are not part of the Holy See or else he would have very quickly. The Pope is often misrepresented in his statements because people take one sentence out of a 16 page document in order to make him out to be a evil, arrogant tyrant.

Luckily certain religious leaders, say the Dali Llama or Archbishop of Canterbury are on very good terms with the Pope.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why do you feel that I am evil?

You type in blue. This means you kill babies.

Hence you are evil.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
👆 👆 👆 👆 👆

Every other religious leader has.

Did the Buddha?

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Did the Buddha?

He sat on a couple unbelieving heathens here and there.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Um no, there's a reason that it hasn't been excepted. Complexity is a bad argument, and ID can't be tested because it works off of bad arguments... All of it's evidence is a matter of interpretation.

Of course, only a total idiot would think that evolution if it was true, would "Disprove" God. Because it wouldn't, and I don't know where you got the idea it would from.

I never said that evolution would disprove anything. Here is what I said:

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
How can biased evolutionists be trusted? They work off of the assumption that evolution is true. They do not use the scientific method objectively, they are bent on disproving the existence of God.

I simply stated that evolutionists are determined to disprove God. I did not say that evolution would or was capable of disproving God .

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
He sat on a couple unbelieving heathens here and there.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
👆 👆 👆 👆 👆

Every other religious leader has.

That's a complete lie.

Originally posted by King Kandy
EVERY religious leader?

That's a complete lie.

Well do what I didnt and provide an example, dont just say "thats a complete lie".

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
I never said that evolution would disprove anything. Here is what I said:

I simply stated that evolutionists are determined to disprove God. [B]I did not say that evolution would or was capable of disproving God . [/B]

Originally posted by King Kandy
Which makes no sense, since many Evolutionary Biolegists believe in God.

He meant SOME evolutionists, i.e Dawkins, not all of them.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
Well do what I didnt and provide an example, dont just say "thats a complete lie".

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That doesn't change jack shit about what I said.

You made a claim, failed to support it and used it to draw a conclusion.

Thats just stupid.

That was never my purpose. My objective was to prove that the scientific method was applicable for supporting my theory that God created the universe and everything in it. But I did provide a link that aims to do what you request. I have more links that support my hypothesis than I am able to furnish. I would be here all night posting them, and you would be here for the rest of your life reading them.

Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
The scientific method can be appropriately applied to intelligent design postulation; therefore, it [b]is scientific theory. [/B]

Only in as much as ID fails the method.

Your hypothesis cannot be substantiated. You only have assumptions- assumptions that something intelligent must have designed it, and assumptions that the evidence shows it. You have NO evidence, only questions.

Such a thing has absolutely no place at all in the science classroom. None.

The only reason you believe so is your total perversion of what and what is not scientific. This cannot be reasonably argued with you because you display absolutely no reason in this area, much as the fanatic dpes. This is a pitiful quality.