sagat wins. he has "feats":
-he is the emperor of mauy thai and that's a "feat"
-he lost to ryu...that's a "feat"
-he put adon in the hospital while unfocused...that's a "feat"
versus paul:
-who only happens to be the unofficial winner of Tekken3. but that's not a feat.
-who can KO bears with one hit. but that's not a feat.
-who can shatter boulder to dust and walls to bits without using his full strength. btu that's not a feat.
-he stalemated with kazuya. but that's not a feat.
-he took on and defeated a god of war. but that's not a feat.
hence Sagat wins since SF fighters always win. i mean, sure paul has been fighting since childhood is a master of brawling and judo, has taken down monsters and gods and part demons while being an ordinary human..............but it doesnt matter since he's up against an SF fighter with multiple "feats".
~The Sarcastic Sado-sama
Originally posted by Sado22
sagat wins. he has "feats":
-he is the emperor of mauy thai and that's a "feat"
-he lost to ryu...that's a "feat"
-he put adon in the hospital while unfocused...that's a "feat"~The Sarcastic Sado-sama
Why must you always twist everything up?
- Sagat fought and beat Dan Hibiki's father. The fight cost him his eye. Dan's father was actually very strong.
- He lost to Adon and yet Adon is the fighter that ends up weeks in a hospital.
- Sagat owned Ryu in SF1. The fight was pretty much over, and then Ryu cheapshotted the crap out of Sagat with the mesatsu go shoryuu.
*Sigh*
Originally posted by BlaxicanHydraSo? Don't be racist.
That guy isn't even black, wtf.
Originally posted by Superboy PrimeNot as impressive as Paul's feats.
Why must you always twist everything up?- Sagat fought and beat Dan Hibiki's father. The fight cost him his eye. Dan's father was actually very strong.
- He lost to Adon and yet Adon is the fighter that ends up weeks in a hospital.
- Sagat owned Ryu in SF1. The fight was pretty much over, and then Ryu cheapshotted the crap out of Sagat with the mesatsu go shoryuu.*Sigh*