How to make the Games vs Forums a better place

Oh, what's funny is the closest statement to that was from you. 😛

i agree with Doan, and no gears!! far too many ryu.. 😛 and same with other fighting games

i think the army idea is great tho, armies vs armies so theres more to debate than just two characters and more twists, for exampe takeing away certain powers from characters to make them on par perhaps with characters who would usually be lower than them

Something new. Tournaments. Not concentrating on just "fights" Maybe like subject. Like Best kills, Have game vs game topics in subjects. This is all just getting a little bit too repetative and is kind of turning me off from the site. I have only been here for a little more than a week and are already sick of the simple narrowed minded strictly fighting versus topics

Oh yeah add to the rules. They obviously dont cover everything. Make sure to add Dont try anything out of the norm and stick to strictly fighting topics. And listing everything your not allowed to do. It would be smaller than making a list of what your allowed to do. Saying your not allowed when a rule bored doesnt say ur not allowed is kind of confusing.. Lets see.Expaning the range of characters. Instead of only game characters how about characters who are in games but also featured in other media. SOo many movies,comics, and other media are being made into games and I dont see why they cant be pit up aginst someone else. Whatelse....

im sure ill think of other stuff as time passes

.kcos

The Games VS forum will NEVER be opened up to characters that originate outside of the rules. Never.

Not only do I not like the idea, but you'd find that it'd be very, very unpopular. Nor is it at all needed because there are tons and tons of games and characters that are never even touched here.

Character Vs. should be pretty self-explanatory. Two characters/teams fight. I don't quite see why that should need to be explained. One match per thread should also be pretty common sense.

Game vs game was tested and generally considered a failure.

If thats the case...If one vs per thread. Then how come Gauntlets are allowed....That has usualy has way more than one vs one or even a team. Its not team it multiple versus topics in one thread.

A gauntlet is essentially one person fighting characters from a team one at a time.

I dont even care really that chars outside of video games dont get added.I see why...too much content....but still the rules page needs to be revamped for newer members. And yes it says char vs But ALL i see is people naming feats. Not explainning how the battle will come out. So sayings they are supposed to be threads about fighting simply defeats the purpose if everyone is naming nothing but feats.

Originally posted by shin_gear
A gauntlet is essentially a team of fighters fighting one person at a time.

not all at the same time...one after another...different versus. Which can easily be seperated into differnt versus topics. and rules state that it cant go above 6. i have seen forums deleted for having more than 6. Some of these gauntlets go above that number

We say who wins based off of accomplishments, or capabilities.

And, I said one at a time.

And each of those one at a time fights cant be done in seperate threads why? One on one matches. Just more than one one on one matches with one person going up aginst different people. Which are different versus topics. yeah capabilities and feats right. thats not exactly telling what would happen if too people would fight. Thats simply stating who has the better feats. Not saying really how one or another would fight aginst that person. Just simply naming who has the better feats

But we also incorporate what would happen between two characters in fights, based on feats and capabilities. It's usually not just mentioning feats.

I know they can be made into different versus threads, but gauntlets are allowed, so they're made.

Edit: I haven't used the basic template for over six months...KMC looks all wierd now...

ok. so if i were to put every single vs topic ryu was in and turned it into a gauntlet that would be cool?

As long as it doesn't surpass 6 characters in the gauntlet. If ones that involve more than 6 are existent then they were just overlooked. If they're not on the first page they should just be forgotten.

sure........now back to the feats. peole dont incorperate feats into the fight they just name them.like bison taking a nuke,akuma sinking an island ryu falling from 200 stories or Chewif falling from too kilometers. How does that help with a fight

exp1-is a character really going to blast bison with a nuke
exp2-Is akuma really going to sink a island during a fight(specialy after a fight he lost aginst someone who doesnt have that ability)
exp3-Is ryu realling going to fall 200 stories or being thrown off a cliff 200 stories-
exp4- is Cheif really going to fall from 2 kilo from the sky

How do those feats actualy help during a fight if they afre just simply feats. That doesnt describe how they are going to fight aginst one another. All the topics i have seen rarely rarely i have not seen anyone say how are they going to help in a fight just simply naming them....Deathwing Can fly...soo high...control ground...no one can touch him...Ok...how does tat help him. Other characters can fly...Oh he'll just breathe fire... Doesnt mean he going to hit them. ALl i see is simply naming feats.

Another thread. Im a compare it to mind....Can anyone tell me why their can be a thread for the fastest killing methods and there cant be one for the best kills between characters? not ranging from more than six

Akuma "sinking" an island speaks of his power. Akuma fans don't say that he's going to "sink" an island in battle. They say Akuma will use the same power he used to "sink" his island on the opponent, which would then obliterate the opponent no matter who it was, despite it taking time to generate with just about all of Akuma's energy. 😛

Bison taking a nuke speaks of his durability, but then again if someone was to nuke him and shoot him with a machine gun, he would die, not that he wouldn't without after having taken a nuke anyway. Shoryuken FTW.

Master Chief and Hayabusa falling from heights speak of their durability, so someone punching them for instance is hardly going to do anything, assuming of course that person has somewhat above average strength.

So Akuma can sink and Island but when he punches someone it doesnt has the same effect

Bison gut his ass kicked by bear hand Akuma. Akuma's hands doesnt equal uranium nucklear radiation plus load of the bomb not even to mention the degrees

Spartans with the same armor took bullets and died. Bullets are less deadlier than a 2 kilo fall.

Hayabua....well...hayabusa is just kick ass....cant really remember anything where he gets his arse tapped

LOL @ arse tapped. tongue

Akuma punching someone not having the same effect is because he used a self-taught technique that channeled all of his energy into his hand, against the island, and the technique was specifically created to crumble large objects. That's not what his basic punches are like, but when you have fanboys roaming around the board *coughremyandremocough* you hear that he can throw island busting blows around.

We don't know if it took just Akuma's hands to win against Bison. He has several techniques, such as the Shun Goku Satsu for instance. Besides the nuke at the very least made him killable by bullets.

Hayabusa once got slashed through by the Dark Dragon Blade...but then again it's the Dark Dragon Blade. ermm

When did Spartans take bullets and die outside of gameplay?

chea i spent time in canada

lol damn right they do

I forgot where it said it. But some people and some reliable sources said it was hands down to show the power gap between the too.

And those words you speaking about RYu getting cutdown...THAT's blasphemy were I come from...j/p...im too tired to go on any further tonight

But i still think rules should be revised and edited revamped what ever word yall wanna use. Aswell as more options for vs topics be opened up.

Best kills topic had potential p_q