Does the Trilogy have plot holes ??

Started by coolmovies5 pages

Does the Trilogy have plot holes ??

I know alot of you love sw to bits but the thing is its been 30 years since sw and thats more then enough time to understand three movies .

e.g why did this happen ? and so on ! why do fans still ask questions about the star wars ?

Did GL leave Plot holes ??

Are they the most confusing films ever made ?

I would say there has to be some. I am just not to good at finding them.

The reason people have wondered all these years if the "prophecy was true" was:

Once there was a movie Star Wars, and a great movie it was. So good that it ended up forming a holy trinity with its two sequels in the theaters. Then the milking movie-cow died, but people knew that there was another Skywalker to save the day, Anakin. He was the chosen one who would bring back the balance to the Movie-Force (and some dollars into Gorges purse).

So people now had a messiah to wait for, he died in a last of the three movies, but one could not easily miss the little smirk on the lips of his spirit form... He would be back to bring his Empire to the whole galaxy. And there he shall rule the galaxy by the right side of his master. And we shall be able to see these movies, till the end of our days.

Yee-Haw. 💃

Re: Does the Trilogy have plot holes ??

Originally posted by coolmovies
Did GL leave Plot holes ??

No. The OT is infallible.

Of course it is.

ROTJ is the plothole.

Most definately. Most holes in the saga trace to ROTJ.

Unfortunately... a blemish on the OT.

"Which will explain your hysteria over a simple blemish on the [Saga]"

*BLEMISH!!!*

The PT is kinda crap

Holy crap! This place was shrunk down! Way to go queeq.

I wouldn't say the PT was crap, I rather enjoyed it.

But not up to par.

time for part 7 lolz

Not after seeing the PT, thanks.

Originally posted by queeq
But not up to par.

Its as good as the OT, maybe even better.

Better then the OT ? No way

Nope...

Originally posted by Count Makashi
Its as good as the OT, maybe even better.
What? How...? Did the OT have Jar Jar Binks? Did the OT have Ray Park with all those ruttin' tattoos? Did the OT have masses of ridiculous, pathetic battle droids that make stormtroopers look like Robin Hood!? Did the OT have "Hold me Ani"? Did the OT have gorram whiney Hayden Christiansen? Did the OT have cheap plot efforts to include droids? Did the OT have an overabundance of overrated special effects? Did the OT have a century-long shitbag of a podrace? Did the OT have 'Yipee' Darth Vader?
And did the PT have mother f*cking Han Solo? Did it have Alec Guiness? Did it have Darth Vader kicking anus? Did the PT have, hell, did the PT have ewoks? DId the PT have a Wookiee used to any reasonable effect in the story? Did the PT have Boba Fett doing something cool, rather than that tosser Jango- who is NOT Boba by any means! Did the PT have the Death Star? Did the PT have a gold bikini?
All that's going for the PT is Ewan McGregor, so...
Guess which is better????

The PT was good i mean listen to me....It Gave us a satisfying turn of Anakin it let us Understand the Sith and the Origins of Sith and it unlocked a Bunch of EU books

The OT was the best of course because it came out first and it was just SO original and it changed the world it started the series and made a crap load of EU books

So both are VERY GOOD in a point of view the only reason yall dont like PT was because of JAR JAR BINKS i belive and a few plot holes.

Oh no... not the point of view approach....