Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Started by Burning thought3,949 pages

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
The statements were in fact canon information as they came from the game. So saying it was a statement and not evidence made me lol.

The rock is the same every time, but its not a consistent feat. Apart from the obvious lol that comes from it, even when you explain yourself its still wrong.

Required gameplay = canon. You have to move the rock to beat the game, Link moved the rock. You have to beat Ganon to beat the game, Link beat Ganon.

Your explanation is just lulz, its riddled with a confused thought. The best part is that you said this:

That, sir, is hilarious as a good part of your arguments against Link feats are that its fiction and is not always subject to the laws of the real world. As are your arguments for Kain's feats.

No their just statements from other members, there was no information from the game itself as there were no official quotes shown before I stated there was not, theres been a couple since then that have shown some real quotes although I have shown more. This was not a contradiction of anything, you just did not like the statement.

Erm, yes I just explained this, the rock being the same rock in both the instances means that if Link only lifts one rock, its not a consistent feat of strength, nor is lifting 2.

You think ime wrong so I am contradicting myself? lol....and you think the player having to beat Ganon is the only reason Link beating Ganon is canon? lots of lulz....

We do have to take into account realism, simply not necesserily the rules of the real world, merely realism within the fiction itself e.g. not gameplay mechanics.

You seriously want to bring this here?

But... but this is a happy thread...

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
You seriously want to bring this here?

Why not? it cant really go anywhere else....

Originally posted by General Kaliero
But... but this is a happy thread...

๐Ÿ˜„ you gave me the idea ๐Ÿ˜‰

Astually, as we've said before, the off-topic thread isn't for stupid arguments to spill into out of the normal threads. If you feel you must continue bickering on this site, take it to PM.

Well, on the bright side I got a new contradiction for my wall.

That wall is a bait and should be removed.

We tend to not really control what people put in their profiles.

Oh come on. You and Terry made walls for each other. That's either a bait from the two of you or an expression of love.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Oh come on. You and Terry made walls for each other. That's either a bait from the two of you or an expression of love.

*snirk*

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Oh come on. You and Terry made walls for each other. That's either a bait from the two of you or an expression of love.

He does not really exist on the forum anymore so I cant really be baiting him ๐Ÿ˜›

Originally posted by Peach
We tend to not really control what people put in their profiles.

That so? hmm gives me ideas that does ๐Ÿ˜„

Originally posted by General Kaliero
*snirk*
*snickers *

clapping

BT has an idea.

Should I really be clapping?

Well. Kinda, I guess.

Maybe not though.

...hmm...

However, I will point out that in the past people have been asked to remove things that were blatantly bashing.

So keep that in mind.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
clapping

BT has an idea.

Should I really be clapping?

Well. Kinda, I guess.

Maybe not though.

...hmm...

looking at his profile no.

I have an idea that should both amuse me and help you Moocow.

If blatant bashing can be removed, I request the removal of the section of BT's profile blatantly bashing myself ๐Ÿ˜›

Cory did not bash you, me quoting my amusement at him supposing the idea that you are mentally disadvantaged is not bashing, certainly not from me ๐Ÿ™‚

I disagree, especially given that claiming I have a mental disadvantage is 1. fallacious 2. intended to be insulting.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Cory did not bash you, me quoting my amusement at him supposing the idea that you are mentally disadvantaged is not bashing, certainly not from me ๐Ÿ™‚
That is bashing he is litteraly implying SP's is mentally challenged. also you having that on your page is making you the basher too.