Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Started by ScreamPaste3,949 pages

no one made my page.
I'll make it ๐Ÿ˜› Join up, sir.

So every page in the wiki should have "The above information may or may not actually be true and is open to individual interpretation" then..

A lot of rubbish was added to it.

But as I said, delete my account and have your trolls resource, it proves me correct.

Originally posted by Peach
I had added in "The above information may or may not actually be true and is open to individual interpretation", to which Jaxx added "(it isn't)", and then after BT tried to edit it several times I added in "He is also apparently unable to accept the idea that any may disagree with him, as is evident by the edit history of this page."

That's the only changes that was lost when it was reverted to old state by Burning Thought?

Originally posted by General Kaliero
What is sad is that BT's page has been locked with the correct, factual text up and not a troll resource.

Ahh, the sweet stench of fascist censorship of free speech.

No there were a few jibes for everything I stated, simply click on history down the bottom and revert to one of Gks posts and youll have your resource.

It's a fairly harmless addendum, BT. You're the only member to have penned so much of your own page before anyone could add personal touches to it, so we simply added a satirical feel. Harmless, and fair.

Originally posted by Rapidash
That's the only changes that was lost when it was reverted to old state by Burning Thought?

Well, that and the fact that GK had taken a virtual red pen to the article, as BT's grammar is atrocious.

Originally posted by Burning thought
No there were a few jibes for everything I stated, simply click on history down the bottom and revert to one of Gks posts and youll have your resource.

He's correct, though I'd recommend one of Peach's revisions with fuller text. I was only able to weaken some of the wall of egotism with an unbiased viewpoint, Peach clarified that the rest may or may not be true, and added the fact that he doesn't like others helping with his page.

Theres no point in adding anything if someone is going to fill it with bias and hater information.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Theres no point in adding anything if someone is going to fill it with bias and hater information.

Um, nothing we added was biased, though everything you wrote was.

Saying you don't like being disagreeing with you isn't "hater information", and it even had fact to back it up (the "check the edit history" part).

Rubbish

Turning everything in my post around to discredit me is hateing, if you wanted to add something add it, but changeing what I had typed is not only rude but hateing.

It had no fact to back up anything, you simply stated an opinion of what you thought was happening and used the history as evidence for your opinion.

I'll look at both the old and "new" article and I'll try work out a fair ending.

As for grammatical errors and such, one can't ask to not have such things edited. It's a wiki article and it's supposed to have as professional an appearance as possible. It's not a self-biography.

The only actual change to what you typed was to actually make things grammatically correct. It's not our fault that you could not be bothered to proofread it.

And yes. I stated an opinion, and used evidence to back it up. The evidence showed it to indeed be true and not simply opinion. That's how it works, yeah?

Originally posted by Burning thought
Rubbish

Turning everything in my post around to discredit me is hateing, if you wanted to add something add it, but changeing what I had typed is not only rude but hateing.

It had no fact to back up anything, you simply stated an opinion of what you thought was happening and used the history as evidence for your opinion.


The very purpose of a wiki is to allow all users to edit the pages therein. If you can't handle that, very well, don't participate.

It's sad, though, that you can't stand anyone having anything other than a brainlessly stellar opinion of you. If you could laugh at yourself, life might be a little more fun.

I'll look at both the old and "new" article and I'll try work out a fair ending.

The above seems to be a very suitable solution. Rapidash is looking over the page, and I trust she can come to a solution.

For now I hope we can all stop arguing over it.

Also, I like how I've been declared a fangirl of my boyfriend ๐Ÿ˜›

Originally posted by Peach
Also, I like how I've been declared a fangirl of my boyfriend ๐Ÿ˜›

You fangirl over me all the time, baby. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Originally posted by General Kaliero
You fangirl over me all the time, baby. ๐Ÿ˜‰

innocent

Originally posted by Peach
The only actual change to what you typed was to actually make things grammatically correct. It's not our fault that you could not be bothered to proofread it.

And yes. I stated an opinion, and used evidence to back it up. The evidence showed it to indeed be true and not simply opinion. That's how it works, yeah?

No you stated an opinion of what I was thinking, then used the history to justify your opinion. Its still an opinion, not necesserily correct at all or even close.

Originally posted by General Kaliero
The very purpose of a wiki is to allow all users to edit the pages therein. If you can't handle that, very well, don't participate.

It's sad, though, that you can't stand anyone having anything other than a brainlessly stellar opinion of you. If you could laugh at yourself, life might be a little more fun.

I wont.

I dont give a flying fishes left fin what someone thinks of me but trying to reverse everything I had stated is like changing my opinion all to yours.

Also, I like how I've been declared a fangirl of my boyfriend
This was my doing ๐Ÿ˜›