Woohoo, official off-topic thread!

Started by Phantom Miria3,949 pages
Originally posted by Silent Entry
Kind of a random reply wouldn't you agree...

No. It was relevant to what he said.

What who said? That part was just between you and me if I'm not mistaken.

You quoted me quoting Nemesis X talking about his mother.

That was short lived.

the problem that i have with socks is that they occasionally take good names.

if youre going to sock with the intention of getting caught can you at least have the courtesy to use retarded names that no one will ever want to use?

he was doing good with fwahman or w/e, but when you start using potentially badass names like silent entry youre wearing out your welcome >\

Silent Entry should be banned for sexual innuendo.

Good thing I made sure to take this totally badass name, amirite? ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Silent Entry is an awesome name. The only better name I can think of right now would be Grizzly Forced Entry.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
the problem that i have with socks is that they occasionally take good names.

if youre going to sock with the intention of getting caught can you at least have the courtesy to use retarded names that no one will ever want to use?

he was doing good with fwahman or w/e, but when you start using potentially badass names like silent entry youre wearing out your welcome >\


I agree with this. Though frankly, looking for cool names on the new members list is a nice tip-off for us. There's a couple we've nabbed before he's had a chance to post.

It the same guy?

Wandering Flame's an old troll from years back. Every few months he'll decide to spamsock again, meaning we have fun exercising our ban muscles for a few days until he gets bored.

you guys have a pretty different outlook on it... REX is exasperated with nebaris.

The Star Wars forums, where Nebaris usually operates, are also a ridiculously different atmosphere. We're more relaxed here, and our enforced rules about matches greatly decrease the ratio of arguing to debating.

Plus, we're so lenient in here about warnings and such that when someone finally earns a ban, it's a nice release of annoyance. Sort of like e-ndorphins.

Should be less lenient, imho. ๐Ÿ˜›

Probably!

We have been talking about that of late, but frankly, the transition means a lot of you will likely suddenly be getting lots of proper, official warnings.

Can the Admin or possibly global mod warn the moderators for breaking the same rules as members?

Oh boy...here we go again.

Originally posted by General Kaliero
Probably!

We have been talking about that of late, but frankly, the transition means a lot of you will likely suddenly be getting lots of proper, official warnings.

You know I'm willing to take a bullet for the greater good. ๐Ÿ˜› See member title. ๐Ÿ˜–hifty:

I can behave if I need to.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Can the Admin or possibly global mod warn the moderators for breaking the same rules as members?

Moderators are not immune to being reported.

Originally posted by Burning thought
Can the Admin or possibly global mod warn the moderators for breaking the same rules as members?

If the admin or global sees just cause for a warning, yes.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You know I'm willing to take a bullet for the greater good. ๐Ÿ˜› See member title. ๐Ÿ˜–hifty:

I can behave if I need to.


Good to hear! Now why can't you behave in general? ๐Ÿ˜‰