Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
The total force of Bowser being tossed 50 or so feet combined with the force of the bomb also launching him 50 or so feet, does not exceed the amount of force that would be put on him if Mario launched him a mile.
Shrapnel and spikes plus both forces.
Edit: Though it is a relatively low showing for Bowser.
Originally posted by CosmicCometWhich do you recommend ps3 or 360 ?
Morrowind came out like in 2003 or something. It's on Xbox 1 and PC. (Still VERY worth it on PC, has like infinite replay value thanks to mods)Oblivion is the one for 360, PS3 and PC.
Any differences ?
I think I owned elder scrolls is that morrowind at one point but gaming just wasn't in me then.
Also will it hurt me if I play oblivion first story wise like do you need to play these games in succession.
Originally posted by quanchi112Eh, I am not sure if there is that big a difference honestly. 360 worked fine for me, though PC tends to be better than both.
Which do you recommend ps3 or 360 ?Any differences ?
I think I owned elder scrolls is that morrowind at one point but gaming just wasn't in me then.
Also will it hurt me if I play oblivion first story wise like do you need to play these games in succession.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Which do you recommend ps3 or 360 ?Any differences ?
I think I owned elder scrolls is that morrowind at one point but gaming just wasn't in me then.
Also will it hurt me if I play oblivion first story wise like do you need to play these games in succession.
The PS3 version came out later so it was improved. But I believe the 360 version was supposed to get a patch later on to improve it to the same level. I'm not sure if it ever got it though.
Just get it for whichever controller you like better.
And no you don't need to play the games in succession. But if you play Morrowind first it will make Oblivion's lore that much more enjoyable since you may recognize stuff.
*sigh* Barenziah. You dirty elf MILF you.
Originally posted by The Scenario
Shrapnel and spikes plus both forces.Edit: Though it is a relatively low showing for Bowser.
Shrapnel and spikes don't contribute to the forces, and if the shrapnel was moving fast enough to damage Bowser then it would have traveled far enough to hurt Mario as well; it doesn't.
Jesus, guys. We all know that the answer is that the reason why Mario is shown lifting a castle but can't toss Bowser farther than 50 feet is because it's a cartoon, and we all know that the reason why Mario has the power in his legs to move fast enough to dodge lasers but needs a water jetpack to jump higher than 20 feet, is because it's a cartoon, and it's not designed to make sense, it's designed to be fun and goofy.
edit- And as far as showings go, it's not just a "showing" because it happened that way in every fight throughout the game, therefore it has enough consistency to be considered a character trait. So what makes that a low showing for Mario and Bowser, instead of the castle lifting just being cartoony PIS? Both feats are shown often enough in the series to be considered traits of the character, but you want to pick one over the other.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Shrapnel and spikes don't contribute to the forces, and if the shrapnel was moving fast enough to damage Bowser then it would have traveled far enough to hurt Mario as well; it doesn't.Jesus, guys. We all know that the answer is that the reason why Mario is shown lifting a castle but can't toss Bowser farther than 50 feet is because it's a cartoon, and we all know that the reason why Mario has the power in his legs to move fast enough to dodge lasers but needs a water jetpack to jump higher than 20 feet, is because it's a cartoon, and it's not designed to make sense, it's designed to be fun and goofy.
edit- And as far as showings go, it's not just a "showing" because it happened that way in every fight throughout the game, therefore it has enough consistency to be considered a character trait. So what makes that a low showing for Mario and Bowser, instead of the castle living just being cartoony PIS?
Funny that you mention that because if you played sunshine you'd notice in that game upon jumping from the sewers he gets more air time than jumping normal I honestly think some games are just limiting him more than anything.
and I think he meant in comparison to other games.
Mario is one of the few I can think of that I would blatantly call toonforcing.
I mean...how the hell do you rate him with how inconsistent he is? How do you determine what's an 'average' level for him.
...Damn. Now that I think of it Samurai Jack was kinda like that too. LLifting a 700 ton sumo in one episode, and not being able to throw a rock farther than maybe 30 feet in another.
Originally posted by Coco292Could you prove to me that the feats shown in the games where he's shown to be weaker are the non-canon ones, whereas the feats shown in the games where he looks stronger are the canon ones?
Funny that you mention that because if you played sunshine you'd notice in that game upon jumping from the sewers he gets more air time than jumping normal I honestly think some games are just limiting him more than anything.and I think he meant in comparison to other games.
Originally posted by CosmicCometYeah, exactly, that's my whole point.
Mario is one of the few I can think of that I would blatantly call toonforcing.I mean...how the hell do you rate him with how inconsistent he is? How do you determine what's an 'average' level for him.
...Damn. Now that I think of it Samurai Jack was kinda like that too. LLifting a 700 ton sumo in one episode, and not being able to throw a rock farther than maybe 30 feet in another.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Could you prove to me that the feats shown in the games where he's shown to be weaker are the non-canon ones, whereas the feats shown in the games where he looks stronger are the canon ones?
I'm not saying the weaker ones are non canon persay Im saying he's probably gotten stronger since then due to what he has taken in the most recent games.
Originally posted by NemeBroYeah pc is usually better from what I hear but I only console game now anyways.
Eh, I am not sure if there is that big a difference honestly. 360 worked fine for me, though PC tends to be better than both.
Originally posted by CosmicCometI'll research it. I still have fable 3 and another game I am playing right now anyways. My new xbox slim has so much memory I like getting games for it since my ps3 has only 40 gigs which sucks but bought it with my gf pregame phase.
The PS3 version came out later so it was improved. But I believe the 360 version was supposed to get a patch later on to improve it to the same level. I'm not sure if it ever got it though.Just get it for whichever controller you like better.
And no you don't need to play the games in succession. But if you play Morrowind first it will make Oblivion's lore that much more enjoyable since you may recognize stuff.
*sigh* Barenziah. You dirty elf MILF you.
I wonder how tricky it is to transfer all my saved data to a new ps3 if I get one. I don't want to lose my saved data.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
In this case, the sequel was infact better.
Originally posted by Nemesis X
Anybody wanna beat the crap out of a guy who said that Shawn Robert's portrayal as Albert Wesker is better than Heath Ledger's portrayal as the Joker? Apparentley some people in the world believe that Resident Evil Afterlife is better than the Dark Knight I kid you not.