Originally posted by The ScenarioThanos has been consistently portrayed as owning planet wreckers. His portrayal is way up there. Bad argument.
'K, so let's say Galactus fires an energy blast that can destroy a planet. Then, shockhorror, he uses this blast on Thanos. Thanos survives. By our logic, this makes Thanos more durable than a planet. That is what's known as a durability feat, correct?But according to you, this doesn't make any sense and is tragically wrong on all counts. Thus, Thanos is not as durable as a planet and would die after falling 100 meters onto spikes.
Am I reading your argument correctly?
Surfer can easily destroy a planet but can't even get Thanos to bat an eyelash. Portrayal always has Thanos above them.
Originally posted by NemeBroIt was the same kinds of fireballs it was just a cinema. His skin isn't more durable than a chopper.
Who gives a shit about Revan? **** Revan.1. Other than you screaming "It's WRAUNG!!!!" what makes that wrong? Now, if in the game Johnny Cage was explicitly shown to have less than helicopter durability, you would have a point. That said, when did Johnny Cage survive multiple fireballs from Shang Tsung? Oh, and context is everything, was this a larger, more powerful fireball than the kind of fireballs Shang Tsung randomly throws?
2. Only Akuma is explicitly shown to be durable enough to laugh off spikes. For the love of God, you have to be trolling, because if not then by all rights you should not actually know how to operate a keyboard. Can Bison wreck islands? There are many things wrong with what you just said, and I will point them out to you. First of all, he has not ever wrecked an island. But he has vaporised cities. 😐 Secondly, Bison and Akuma have "fought" once. It consisted of Akuma killing Bison with a single attack. 😐 In literally every piece of media I have seen, Akuma is more powerful than Bison. Oh, and Bison has, by the way, survived having nuclear missiles dropped on him.
3. And what point were you trying to prove troll? That you are a troll who brings up irrelevant noncanon points for the sake of trolling? Well, see here troll, I can do that too. Akuma has beaten Galactus in a game and stolen his Power Cosmic, and has fought with guys like Thor, Dormammu, and Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet. There, noncanon feats are fun, huh?
4. Oh really? What lesser things have hurt Evil Ryu by the way? 🙂 By all means, humor me, since the few times Evil Ryu has shown up, he was basically immune to the attacks the other fighters threw at him, and bullets of course were useless against him. Don't make claims you cannot prove.
5. To be blunt, Mortal Kombat characters are not very durable. While Liu Kang could surely tear through the flesh of a normal human, against someone who possesses superhuman durability, it is not so easy, or even impossible.
6. Why not? Oh, and keep in mind that fatalities only are used after the opponent has had the shit beaten out of them and are nearly dead, meaning the reason he does not just do that to the fighters right off the bat, is because he cannot. Oh, and I should point out that technically fatalities are a gameplay mechanic, in the same way it is possible for a Dan player to beat Akuma in gameplay. Would not happen in the plot, but can happen in gameplay. That is not an issue of feats vs. portrayal, that is an issue of gameplay mechanics, like Fatalities are.
7. The real question is: Why would Johnny Cage try to kill Liu Kang? IIRC they have never been enemies. I have no doubt that Johnny Cage can punch the head off a normal man, or lesser, maybe even equal fighters in MK. Can he do the same to Onaga? Nah, probably not.
I always got the vibe that Mortal Kombat characters were glass cannons. That they can output more damage than their bodies can handle. They have good damage soak, but their bones seem brittle in comparison.
Hahahaha, now bison is portrayed as surviving missiles but sonic booms can ko him. Bison might not beat Akuma but he is portrayed as being a threat to him. What they decide is canon is one thing but it's well within bison's strength and power to beat him maybe just not the skill to pull it off. You missed the point. Shocker.
Fatalities are a consistent part of the mk games and are well within their powers not akuma taking on Thanos with the ig. See I easily destroy your false comparisons. No need to insult the better man.
So evil ryu can just sit there and if they attack him all of them they can't hurt him ? You can't be serious.
Liu Kang tears through shao Kahn's body. Shao Kahn isn't some average human. Maybe according to you but anyone unbiased knows I am right like always. Shao Kahn is that badass who can slap raiden's ass.
Yes, because their opponent needs to be beaten like in most fights to be able to kill them or what not. We see ermac though in canon gameplay easily destroy jax's arms yet he can't do that in gameplay and doesn't need to beat his ass to do so. I have you either way you wanna do this.
If he had Onaga dead to rights I see no reason why he couldn't. Would he ever get the chance no because Onaga would annihilate him.
Nope.
Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
I agree. The King in Chess is a huge pussy. Can only move one spot, must be protected every minute. He is a disgrace.Now the King in checkers fits me more. Out there fighting harder than all the other men, able to take out foes with powerful attacks, able to sacrifice yourself for the good of your kingdom. A real man.
Did you know that a Swedish monarch from the transition of the 17th to the 18th century sought to change the rules of Chess. He desired to put the King at the front of the line of pieces because he, warrior king as he was (Carolus Rex), found it cowardly and improper for a king to hide behind his soldiers 🙂 He himself always fought on the front line. He did it for so long though and despite being a desired target, lived in war for about 20 years 😛
The same king also wanted to rename the "Queen" into "Field Marshal" because the Queen belonged home safe in the castle where she safely could take care of the kingdom in the king's absence. He thought it far more appropriate to have a piece named the "Field Marshal" on the board than a woman. Since he thought the King nothing but a man, the Queen was nothing but a woman. And women were back then not at all fit for battle.
He's my favorite Swedish king 😄
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Polaski is failing at like, guys. Horribly, horribly failing.
"At like, guys"? You make it sound as if it's:
1) Easy
2) Something you'd do better
Although I'm not sure what tune your X-rated gear dances to, so that could be a given. You might have more experience 😛
.
. .
. . .
Men's a mystery. Don't blame her 😑
Originally posted by Pinkie PieI'd disagree for the most part. Men are pretty simple beings. There are exceptions ofcourse. But mostly we're simple. A lot of the time we wonder why some women don't get us, or what they're trying to tell us. Then again, mostly I deal with me. My friends mostly seem as simple as me though.
"At like, guys"? You make it sound as if it's:1) Easy
2) Something you'd do betterAlthough I'm not sure what tune your X-rated gear dances to, so that could be a given. You might have more experience 😛
.
. .
. . .
Men's a mystery. Don't blame her 😑
And hey, you *have* a man. >=(
Me? I'm on the verge of banging my head against my desk in confusion over a woman. "YES BUT NO BUT SOMETIMES BUT YES ONLY THIS EXCEPT THAT! AND YES! IF THIS! BUT NOT THIS!" @_@ So complicated. If she were asking me it'd just be; "Yes, when?" haermm Eee *headdesk*
Just because I have a wonderful man, doesn't mean I get him 😛 He can be so random at times. Like how I got flowers yesterday. I would look at him "What's in this to you?". Little did I know it was Easter weekend and he wanted beautiful flowers on the table 😛
I don't get my man. Could be that I oversimplify his nature. I can never seem to predict him. And God knows the effort put into getting a date with him 😐
Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]Thanos has been consistently portrayed as owning planet wreckers. His portrayal is way up there. Bad argument.Surfer can easily destroy a planet but can't even get Thanos to bat an eyelash. Portrayal always has Thanos above them.
Apparently police are above Thanos.
EDIT- It's photoshopped. nvm.
Originally posted by Pinkie PieIt's a typo. It was supposed to say "life", Xeno. uhuh
"At like, guys"? You make it sound as if it's:1) Easy
2) Something you'd do betterAlthough I'm not sure what tune your X-rated gear dances to, so that could be a given. You might have more experience 😛
.
. .
. . .
Men's a mystery. Don't blame her 😑
But ironically the problem is her choice in men,so that is kind of eerie.
It's not a mystrey that the man in question is a jobless thug drug addict, a criminal record, and an apartment in the worst neighborhood in the bay area. uhuh