Anyone who agrees with maths have sofar disagreed with the max force added to strike speed. Is that last bit about the Kratos thing?
M and A make the Force, adding that force on further attack speed is... what has been said a few times now. An' nup, dun matter, cos right now we're those two guys in a group of friends at a bar that start talking about politics and the like ^^;;
Look, it's very simple.
If things are being presented as facts in a respect thread and said facts are incorrect, then people can challenge it. What you can't do is go into a respect thread and say "Kain sucks and is a horrible character and only morons like him". That's not acceptable. But challenging info is perfectly fine.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Maybe if I don't actually outright call BT a gargantuan fanboy with vampire creme crusting his upper lip I won't get that warning.
No you wont, there seems to be some discrimination concerning who the rules apply to so you can probably bash me all you like.
Originally posted by BloodRain
Anyone who agrees with maths have sofar disagreed with the max force added to strike speed. Is that last bit about the Kratos thing?M and A make the Force, adding that force on further attack speed is... what has been said a few times now. An' nup, dun matter, cos right now we're those two guys in a group of friends at a bar that start talking about politics and the like ^^;;
M and V tbh, velocity is part of the calculation as it is written, not acceleration but you dont add the force on, you keep the force as shown before then take into account higher acceleration if someone moves quicker. Dante, Kratos, Kain etc are not stuck at human speed, meaning that if they do an attack at said speed its going to be less of a hit than at mach speeds or w/e. If your calculations only calc Dante moving at human speed strikes of force then fair enough, but I wont be doing the same since they are not human, and have much higher velocity.
A "group of friends"? strange wording.
We're just gonna go in l-.... Kratos and Kain are well over peak attack speed? *ahem* urm.. loops, just gonna go in loops here. That SP/GK quote says it better that I did.
Should I have used pack or flock instead? Aye, with this thread being a bar, maths being politics and off-topic stuff being that group of girls that just walked in. Instead of chatting them up we're on about tax and the econamy, all the while getting the look from our peers.
Originally posted by BloodRain
We're just gonna go in l-.... Kratos and Kain are well over peak attack speed? *ahem* urm.. loops, just gonna go in loops here. That SP/GK quote says it better that I did.Should I have used pack or flock instead? Aye, with this thread being a bar, maths being politics and off-topic stuff being that group of girls that just walked in. Instead of chatting them up we're on about tax and the econamy, all the while getting the look from our peers.
Those quotes do not take into account how much speed the starting strength would send a strike going in the first place however. Its like their suggesting that all Games vs characters we argue get their strength purely from their muscles/physical energy in their bodies rather than magic, supernatural forces/divine heritige etc which is the case. Kratos, Kain, Dante all have far beyond peak human attack speed yet what SP claims is that this extra speed has no bearing on force of a strike despite force being massxspeed (velocity) anyway.
Same mass, same speed= F but the same mass, higher speed= greater F than previous force. Simple physics, if Kratos or Dante use nothing but peak human striking speed then I eat my hat. Which btw, could either be a baseball cap or a plastic rodeo prop I wore for lulz. Both would do terrible things to my digestive system.
I understand your meaning.
Originally posted by Burning thought
M and V tbh, velocity is part of the calculation as it is written, not acceleration but you dont add the force on, you keep the force as shown before then take into account higher acceleration if someone moves quicker. Dante, Kratos, Kain etc are not stuck at human speed, meaning that if they do an attack at said speed its going to be less of a hit than at mach speeds or w/e. If your calculations only calc Dante moving at human speed strikes of force then fair enough, but I wont be doing the same since they are not human, and have much higher velocity.
And if you really mean m∆v for Impulse, that's wrong too.
m∆v = F∆t = I
If you substitute v for ∆v, you are going to get a wrong result. ∆v = v_1 - v_0
So no. You are wrong.
Originally posted by General Kaliero
No no no nono. Velocity is the rate and direction of change in the position of an object. Acceleration is the change in velocity. They are not at all interchangeable; if you use F = mv you are going to get a different (probably radically different) and incorrect answer. No.And if you really mean m∆v for Impulse, that's wrong too.
m∆v = F∆t = I
If you substitute v for ∆v, you are going to get a wrong result. ∆v = v_1 - v_0
So no. You are wrong.
What are you talking about? if you look at any calcluations so far they use velocity squared, were trying to get joules.
After finding the mass you;
Measure the velocity of the object in Step 1 (if it has not been provided for you). The object should move in a straight line with a speed that is constant. The average velocity of an object can be determined by dividing change in distance by change in time, or v = ∆distance/∆time, where ∆distance is the end distance in meters less the starting distance (d2-d1) and ∆time is the end time in seconds less the start time (t2-t1).
F in joules=massxvelocity squared. Then from there you can get pounds per square inch.