Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Yes, I make no effort to spare feelings. I thought I made that abundantly clear in the post; hence, I'm confused why you feel need to pose the statement as if it was an observation.As for your question here,
I don't insult women any more than I insult minorities, white people, liberals or anything else, really. You only notice the woman insults because they apply to you more than any of the others... since you're a woman.
In any case, your post is a mess. "So, how are you not a troll?", you ask, you then go ahead to mimic what I already said, that already explains why I'm not a troll. So you posed a question, then answered your own question... ok? And this:
Does not make any sense as a single train of thought. "most of your posts are to call out bluntly what you consider to be someone else'ss foolishness or to parody it" does not imply that I think I'm funny.
I noticed the woman insult because you were going to make one toward me and then chose to bring it up again in that post. You commented people would be offended if you did, hence I ask why you even care considering you know that subject would be hurtful to some people. Which you have yet to answer.
My post isn't a mess at all. Perhaps things just are not the same way they are in your head. But I assure you what you are doing and trolling are actually one and the same from a non-subjective veiw point.
Originally posted by EvilAngelCare about what? What is it that you think I care about? Try to restrict your answer here to one sentence please, for the sake of clarity.
[B]I noticed the woman insult because you were going to make one toward me and then chose to bring it up again in that post. You commented people would be offended if you did, hence I ask why you even care considering you know that subject would be hurtful to some people. Which you have yet to answer.
My post isn't a mess at all. Perhaps things just are not the same way they are in your head. But I assure you what you are doing and trolling are actually one and the same from a non-subjective veiw point.Only if you ignore definitions. Trolling: To say something with the intention of eliciting a specific response from someone. Being an *******: To say something with zero regard for wither or not it hurts someone's feelings.
To say they're the same thing, would be the equivalent of saying that a man willingly driving his car at 100 miles an hour down a suburb street and accidentally hitting a small child, is the same as driving your car at 100 miles an hour down a suburb street, seeing a child, and swerving into them with the intention of splattering them across the pavement.
The former is an accident that arose due to negligence; he was aware that driving at that speed was both illegal and potentially life threatening, but chose to do it anyway. The latter is specific intent. In a court of law, the man would get 2 years in prison for the former, and at least 10 years for the latter. Do you want to try to contest me on this? It's apart of my job to be aware of the massive differences between "murder" and "criminal negligence". The same thing applies here. So no, trying to offend someone, and saying something and not really caring if its offensive or not, are not, objectively, the same thing.
And for the record, please don't try to paint yourself as the victim here. I made that kitchen comment in response to you saying that my face looked like an ass, as you seem to have forgotten...
You hit back just as hard as you get it. That's one of the reasons why I like talking to you, but it also means you're hardly a victim, here.
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Care about what? What is it that you think I care about? Try to restrict your answer here to one sentence please, for the sake of clarity.
Originally posted by EvilAngel
P.S – If no one cares about your speaking stuff about white people why are you so eager to insult women in such a way that we clearly do care about it? Why is that important to you? (since it seems to be)
Originally posted by RE: Blaxican
Only if you ignore definitions. Trolling: To say something with the intention of eliciting a specific response from someone. Being an *******: To say something with zero regard for wither or not it hurts someone's feelings.To say they're the same thing, would be the equivalent of saying that a man willingly driving his car at 100 miles an hour down a suburb street and accidentally hitting a small child, is the same as driving your car at 100 miles an hour down a suburb street, seeing a child, and swerving into them with the intention of splattering them across the pavement.
The former is an accident that arose due to negligence; he was aware that driving at that speed was both illegal and potentially life threatening, but chose to do it anyway. The latter is specific intent. Do you want to try to contest me on this? It's apart of my job to be aware of the massive differences between "murder" and "criminal negligence". The same thing applies here. So no, trying to offend someone, and saying something and not really caring if its offensive or not, are not, objectively, the same thing.
Since Trolling isn't actually a legitimate word there's no clear cut definition so all of that would depend on your source material. It was also a question I had already asked.
Originally posted by EvilAngel
If most of your posts are to call out bluntly what you consider to be someone else’s foolishness or to parody it… what, you think you’re just being funny? Hence the comparison to a comedian?
Though phrased poorly perhaps this has question marks and was intended to be a question to be answered. I am asking why it was you did what you do. Either it's for your own personal amusement with disregard for anyones feelings and even responses. You're trying to impress someone. Or you want to see their reaction when you call them out. The latter of which is of course then meant to be an emotional trigger in your post, prompting an emotional response. Ergo an act of a troll.
Of course in your not-quite-so-clever example the former statement must be changed from
"a man willingly driving his car at 100 miles an hour down a suburb street and accidentally hitting a small child"
to
"a man willingly driving his car at 100 miles an hour down a suburb street saw a small child and deliberately failed to make an evasive action"
Since by definition, an aspect you seem to be quite anal on, an accident is an Undesirable / Unfortunate happening by the viewpoint of those responsible. Since you were also clear you just don't care, we cannot call it an accident.
As such in that example combined elements of speeding and failing deliberately to alter course you'd go down hard.
And yes, I am aware there are two edited double posts above me. I decided to not bother posting, then decided **** it. I'd already written it out. This is stupid though. Obviously, none of this has anything to do with "why I do what I do" or whatever. I hurt your feelings with some comments, and now you want to argue with me. I'm sorry for hurting your feelings, alright? That wasn't my intention.
"You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinburg? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to. "
Originally posted by NemeBro
Hahahahahahaha.I don't really disagree with the concept of what Blax is saying, but let's be honest here: All he is saying is "I say what I feel **** everybody else," only with a more expansive vocabulary.
The way people are talking about him you'd think he just wrote some deep, thought-provoking essay on ball-itch or something.
Thought the same thing when first starting to see you in debates.
I have never said that before on this forum. I have no idea where you're getting that from.
Originally posted by TheAuraAngel👆
"You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinburg? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to. "
Originally posted by TheAuraAngel
"You can't handle the truth! Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinburg? I have a greater responsibility than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to. "
That's a very elaborate verbal bitchslap. Not sure if it has any bearing here though.
In other news, I finally, after many long years of waiting, have an optical fiber Internet connection. Oh yeah, baby!