Originally posted by Mindship
However, if we simplify even further (with the way you've worded the problem, which may be the best expression): Can a being which can do anything do something impossible?
If we say yes, we compromise "impossible."
If we say no, we compromise "omnipotent."Either way, here clearly we are compromising the question's terms...which again brings us back to the follow-up question: What does this mean for "logic" and "omnipotence"? Certainly the compelling conclusion (though not necessarily proving) is that omnipotence can not exist unconditionally.
Exactly.