Originally posted by Rogue JediAgain, universal healthcare would be used for medical purposes only. Abortions required for the sake of the mother would be covered but if a girl walks in and wants to get rid of the baby she'd have to pay out of her own pocket.
kinda like the public paying for abortions. 😉
No one has said anything yet that would prove that universal healthcare is a bad thing.
Originally posted by MarxmanIt would be a GREAT thing, but it's not really feasible.
Again, universal healthcare would be used for medical purposes only. Abortions required for the sake of the mother would be covered but if a girl walks in and wants to get rid of the baby she'd have to pay out of her own pocket.No one has said anything yet that would prove that universal healthcare is a bad thing.
Originally posted by Rogue JediHow can you even say that? Most civilized countries have universal healthcare. FFS, our next door neighbors to the north (Canada if you couldn't figure that out) has it! America is supposed to be this great super power in the world. Why can't I get my fcuking temperature taken without having to pay my co-pay first?
It would be a GREAT thing, but it's not really feasible.
Originally posted by WrathfulDwarfI don't understand what you mean. We're talking about within countries. Our tax dollars for universal healthcare isn't going to be supporting Venezuela.
To me UH is practically saying well advance countries are gonna pay for 3rd World countries medical bills.Can't wait to see how millions of Chinese are going to help pay the medical bills of millions of hindus in India.
...
...and vice versa...
(not been negative it's just and observation)
Originally posted by Bardock42
God, it's so hard being against universial health care with all the idiots agreeing...
Right...I am fine with landing a nice corporate job because of the hard work and experience I put into my resume to land this job...I pay for my medical costs through my group plan...but on the downside...I am also paying for the medical care for everyone that gets medical care under my group plan because I don't use my insurance very often because....I take care of my body!!! 😠
All universal health care would do for me is cause me to have to pay more taxes for something I don't use...I am perfectly fine..paying for healthcare for the large company I work for...But that is my opinion!
Originally posted by dadudemonThat's kinda the point. You do not have an obligation to pay for the shit of everyone.
Right...I am fine with landing a nice corporate job because of the hard work and experience I put into my resume to land this job...I pay for my medical costs through my group plan...but on the downside...I am also paying for the medical care for everyone that gets medical care under my group plan because I don't use my insurance very often because....I take care of my body!!! 😠All universal health care would do for me is cause me to have to pay more taxes for something I don't use...I am perfectly fine..paying for healthcare for the large company I work for...But that is my opinion!
Originally posted by dadudemon
Right...I am fine with landing a nice corporate job because of the hard work and experience I put into my resume to land this job...I pay for my medical costs through my group plan...but on the downside...I am also paying for the medical care for everyone that gets medical care under my group plan because I don't use my insurance very often because....I take care of my body!!! 😠All universal health care would do for me is cause me to have to pay more taxes for something I don't use...I am perfectly fine..paying for healthcare for the large company I work for...But that is my opinion!
Having a 'plan' is optional when healthcare is available to all.
Also, there's no real way modern society could function if people only paid specifically for things relating to themselves.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Having a 'plan' is optional when healthcare is available to all.Also, there's no real way modern society could function if people only paid specifically for things relating to themselves.
OH!!!! I see...so you are saying that I don't have to have a plan at all if health was AVAILABLE to all...in other words...I am not forced into coverage?
Still, even if you opted for no coverage...logic dictates that there would still be a tax increase-with inflation as a calculated variable because the setup of the system would take years to settle-related to the universal health care implementation, relative to the pre-universalized health care system.
Epiphanies are great aren't they? 😄
Edit-This is why government should never have one absolute ruler...different perspectives create a better governing body.
Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Having a 'plan' is optional when healthcare is available to all.Also, there's no real way modern society could function if people only paid specifically for things relating to themselves.
I am not quite sure if that's true. Besides, maybe modern society is not that great then.