Originally posted by Kazenji
Thats 'if' they do have plans for a Game based on this new movie
there is man, and it's planned for next to movie date release on next gen consoles
Originally posted by Kazenji
Thats 'if' they do have plans for a Game based on this new movie
there is man, and it's planned for next to movie date release on next gen consoles
Freakin' nanomeds!
Originally posted by Grammaton
If this new movie is a "re-start" for the Hulk franchise (having nothing to do with the first Hulk) - does this mean we will see the origins of Banner becoming the Hulk again? Because that lame attempt in the first movie didn't do any justice to the birth of the Hulk...and don't get me started on those nanomeds?!?...
Amen brother, amen. Maybe Ang Lee's next film could be a sequel to Brokeback mountain, staring nanomeds and midachlorines (or how ever the hell you spell it) as the gayest ideas to ever be put into a movie (talk about adding a 'solution' where none was needed). They could go off and become cowboys together in the mountains and die in a tragic avalanche.
Re: Freakin' nanomeds!
Originally posted by Cap'n Happy
midachlorines (or how ever the hell you spell it) as the gayest ideas to ever be put into a movie
Its not Bad idea and it Makes sense to me all that Midi-chlorian deal but that talk is best left for the star wars section of these forum
back to the hulk.
Originally posted by ankur29
there is man, and it's planned for next to movie date release on next gen consoles
Ang Lee's Hulk - entertaining movie though it was - was NOT an entertaining Hulk movie. I hope they do the Incredible Hulk justice with regards to his look, behaviour, power and portray him in the way we have become accustomed.
Im not sure but if Tony Stark and references to the Avengers are going to make appearances in the new Hulk film - is it all getting a little gimmicky?
They need to concentrate on getting the movie and the Hulk himself right before jumping ahead.
Originally posted by Grammaton
If this new movie is a "re-start" for the Hulk franchise (having nothing to do with the first Hulk) - does this mean we will see the origins of Banner becoming the Hulk again? Because that lame attempt in the first movie didn't do any justice to the birth of the Hulk...and don't get me started on those nanomeds?!?...
What was wrong with the Hulk movie?????????
a pic of the movies Abomination toy...enjoy it.
http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=6771
i like everything about this look except the ears
Originally posted by Wolverine2006i like everything about this look except the ears
What ears ??
i can't see any on the abomination and also i found this regarding him
in 2008. Director Louis Leterrier has explained this is an entirely new version of Blonsky, who has been updated to being a soldier who injects himself with Banner's gamma formula out of spitefulness. He will not look like a large bipedal reptile, but a mutated "Über" human. Zak Penn said the character will not be called 'The Abomination', but simply Blonsky. An early toy concept shows the character to be brown, with his rib cage meshed into his muscles. He has no ears, but his toes are similarly stubby
Have'nt got a problem with the change as long as it still looks good for the movie.