So, how long before incest becomes morally acceptable?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
How many times in the bible is incest ok?

http://www.thebricktestament.com/genesis/the_seduction_of_lot/gn19_30.html

cry

Originally posted by FeceMan
Statement: Leonheartmm's posting format has improved.

Declaration: This pleases FeceMan.

Statement: Leonheartmm's post contains much circularity and psuedo-philosophical "material" found in The Matrix series.

Admission: Leonheartmm approaches the subject with far less pretentiousness and empty talk than those films did.

the only circularity is found in the definition of SELF AWARENESS. which means awareness through self, of the existance of yourself. other than that, there is no circularity. please elaborate if there is.

and i do not see any psuedo philosophical material, its all very easy to understand, if we use logic to come to terms with ourselves as logically biased entities, which can not use all forms of unbiased logic in practical life. we can easily have an ethics system based on logic.

Originally posted by FeceMan
Not trolling here, but rather I'm honestly interested.

There is not one logical reason why incest is morally wrong. Take, for example, a brother and sister who are in an incestuous relationship. They're both older than the age of consent, and they use methods of contraception--let's say vasectomy, hysterectomy, condoms, and the pill. There is virtually no chance of them ever creating a child, so there will never be the pitter-patter of little Quasimodos lumbering about the house one day.

So, how long until it's acceptable and the bans on intra-family marriage are lifted?

Speaking out of just logic, I wouldn't be surprised if incest does become acceptable sometime way way way in the future. Looking at things like group marriages being accepted in some places...it's pretty easy to believe anything goes these days. Personally, I hope it's never accepted. 🙂

Can you imagine getting a mustache ride from your brother...or getting a blowjob from your sister....or gettin' your mom from behind

😘

Hm..

Might not be too bad, actually.

😛

Originally posted by BlaxicanHydra
Hm..

Might not be too bad, actually.

😛

😆

There ain't enough alcohol in the world to get me drunk enough to try that shit

Originally posted by FeceMan
Admission: HK-47 is FeceMan's favorite character in the game.

HK47 is also a sock whose posting style you have been emulating recently. Coincidence?

Originally posted by dadudemon
I like your form...the HK47 way of posting a debate works really really well...IMO.

Hooray for your sock accounts, i.e. Feceman, HK47, dadudemon, et all!

One time I saw this porn about two gay twin brothers, it was so fkn hott droolio

Originally posted by Council#13
I'd say never. Well, that's just my personal opinion. I find the idea of having sex with a sibling just gross.

Statement: It is possible that rape is considered bad because most people were brought up to believe so.

Statement: There are probably people who do not think that rape is bad.

Conclusion: Rape can not be used to prove moral absolutes.

Declaration: Talking like this is fun.

I find incest not disgusting, but something I would never come close to doing. That doesn't mean I'll stop other people doing it or am against it. If two siblings want to have sex with eachother, let them get on with it, just as long as I get to watch my favourite TV shows, I'm happy.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I find eating celery gross.

Even with penut butter on it?

I find incest not disgusting, but something I would never come close to doing. That doesn't mean I'll stop other people doing it or am against it. If two siblings want to have sex with eachother, let them get on with it, just as long as I get to watch my favourite TV shows, I'm happy.

Pretty much - if they are adults, behind closed doors and they wont be having children then that is their business.

Will it ever become morally acceptable? No, I can't see that happening.

----Statement: There are probably people who do not think that rape is bad----

Asian honour killings often include morally acceptable rape of women by hired goons or family members. Such are the dark age dwellers.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Even with penut butter on it?

Pretty much - if they are adults, behind closed doors and they wont be having children then that is their business.

Will it ever become morally acceptable? No, I can't see that happening.

Yeah, there's nothing wrong with it as long as they're not having kids.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Statement: It is possible that rape is considered bad because most people were brought up to believe so.

Statement: There are probably people who do not think that rape is bad.

Conclusion: Rape can not be used to prove moral absolutes.

Declaration: Talking like this is fun.

Statement: It is probable that rape is considered bad because people who were raped suffer greatly from it.

Statement: People who do not think rape is bad, are insensitive to the suffering of others, and therefore those opinions (which are detached and uninvolved opinions) should not be considered.

Conclusion: Rape is Bad.

Declaration: Rape can be used to support moral absolutes.

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
[b]Statement: It is probable that rape is considered bad because people who were raped suffer greatly from it.

Statement: People who do not think rape is bad, are insensitive to the suffering of others, and therefore those opinions (which are detached and uninvolved opinions) should not be considered.

Conclusion: Rape is Bad.

Declaration: Rape can be used to support moral absolutes. [/B]

Statement: People that are raped are just whiny.

Statement: Especially people that don't consider rape is bad should be considered.

Conclusion: Rape is good and should be made mandatory.

Statement: Using your personal moral standards to rationalize your personal moral standards and calling them absolute is circular reasoning and stupid.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Statement: People that are raped are just whiny.

Statement: Especially people that don't consider rape is bad should be considered.

Conclusion: Rape is good and should be made mandatory.

Statement: Using your personal moral standards to rationalize your personal moral standards and calling them absolute is circular reasoning and stupid.

😆 😆 💃 💃

You have a funny way of making a good point!

Originally posted by Goddess Kali
[b]Statement: It is probable that rape is considered bad because people who were raped suffer greatly from it.

Statement: People who do not think rape is bad, are insensitive to the suffering of others, and therefore those opinions (which are detached and uninvolved opinions) should not be considered.

Conclusion: Rape is Bad.

Declaration: Rape can be used to support moral absolutes. [/B]

I disagree. What if a child is born from the rape, who in his/her later years brings piece to the world?

It goes either way actually. The child could end up a danger to the world and/or himself or could end up trying to help the world. It all depends on what kind of upbringing the child has.