Thanos vs. SuperMAN of Tanget

Originally posted by Alfheim
No its a TIME gem, so all it does is accelerate time. So therefore if somebody is immortal you cant make them old.

What so Elders are greatly decelerated now, so they decided to retcon it specifically so Thanos could beat them. They've been classifed as immortal for 100s of years so now in the comic they're not.

its been stated categorically that they're are immune to aging. Didnt Death make it impossible for them to die? The comic is wrong its still PIS.

Thanos states in that scan that The Runner would eventually die how the **** is he going to die when Death wont take them. PIS.

If he had a reality gem maybe you could argue that case.

Originally posted by Galan007
The TG alone, can completely manipulate/control time, on a Universal scale...

If anything could override Death's decree of "agelessness"..... The TG could.

[Actually...... It HAS]. lol

Well no that depends on who posseses it. Just ebcause you have an infinity gem doesnt all of a sudden make you all powerful you can still be beaten.

Originally posted by quanchi112
i gavce u the answer from a comic. u cry pis. u wnat to pick and choose what u take. weak for a debator. comic books dont have to make sense. this isnt a spiderman beatinf firelord case here. keep crying pis becuz this is canon. u cant change it.
😛

Well no if Death cant take them how can you kill them using time? So the infinity gem makes you more powerful than death?

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well no that depends on who posseses it. Just ebcause you have an infinity gem doesnt all of a sudden make you all powerful you can still be beaten.

comic page i posted answered ur question.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well no if Death cant take them how can you kill them using time? So the infinity gem makes you more powerful than death?

Originally posted by quanchi112
when did anyone say the time gem could make thanos all powerful. he was saying that it could override mistress deaths decree. time gem gives u control over time not mistress death.

comic page i posted answered ur question.

Yes but hes trying to KILL somebody. If Death cant take you how can you kill somebody using time, in fact how can you kill them at all?

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well no that depends on who posseses it. Just ebcause you have an infinity gem doesnt all of a sudden make you all powerful you can still be beaten.

If Rune could do it, I have no doubts that Thanos could do the same. 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
Rune completely mucked with time on a Universal scale, with just the TG...

If Rune could do it, I have no doubts that Thanos could do the same. 🙂

Yes and what did he do? All the gem enables you to do is increase and decrease time. If somebody is immortal it still means you cant make them age, thats what immortality means.

Originally posted by Galan007
Rune completely mucked with time on a Universal scale, with just the TG...

If Rune could do it, I have no doubts that Thanos could do the same. 🙂

with time travel itself u could really alter all of reality. with the time gem just think of all the possibilities.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Yes and what did he do? All the gem enables you to do is increase and decrease time. If somebody is immortal it still means you cant make them age, thats what immortality means.

Originally posted by quanchi112
👆

with time travel itself u could really alter all of reality. with the time gem just think of all the possibilities.

Er yeah it would enable you to control the aspect of reality TIME. Noticed how you dindt refer to my question Thanos even implied that he could have killed Runner. How can he do that when Death cant take them?.

Originally posted by Galan007
Apparently not..... At least where the Elders are concerned. 🙂

yes and what explanation did Thanos give for being able to make Runner old. He said that Runner was VIRTUALLY immortal, therefore if he was truly immortal he would not have been able to do it, because immortality means you have an infinite lifespan, therefore having an infinity gem isnt going to help that.

Originally posted by Alfheim
yes and what explanation did Thanos give for being able to make Runner old. He said that Runner was VIRTUALLY immortal, therefore if he was truly immortal he would not have been able to do it, because immortality means you have an infinite lifespan, therefore having an infinity gem isnt going to help that.

Nonsensical or not, that's just what happened. 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
It's a comic...

Nonsensical or not, that's just what happened. 🙂

Thats a cop out. Some things in comics dont make sense compared to the real world but it still has its own logic. Thats like saying it makes sense if Capos shield gets penetrated by a bullet when it can take shots from Gladiator.

Furthermore why do you think we have rules like PIS and SvFL, so we just accept it because it happened in a comic. The whole point of theese rules is to compare what the hero can do and look at his history, evaluate everything and if it doesnt make any sense then its PIS, not just to accept it because its in a comicbook.

What mlakes it even more PIS is that Runner had a gem on him in the first place. Just having a gem amps your power. So not only cant death take him but he has an infinity gem and Thanos was still able to do that.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Thats a cop out.

srug

I didn't come in here to argue about the paradox that is, immortality....

But I'm sure someone else will "take up the reins".. 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
So it's a cop out to say that something which happened in a comic...... Did in fact happen? 😕

I didn't come in here to argue about the paradox that is, immortality....

But I'm sure someone else will "take up the reins".. 🙂

No no no no no no no no. Is that what im saying? I said we have to evaluate what happened. I even asked you to analysis what Thanos said. Thanos stated that he could kill Runner because he was virtually immortal, which therefore means he would not be able to do this if he were immortal.....and the Elders are because they cant be taken by death.

Why do you think I gave the example of Captain america sheild being penetrated by a bullet, what I said went completely over your head.

Originally posted by Alfheim
Why do you think I gave the example of Captain america sheild being penetrated by a bullet, what I said went completely over your head.

I already told you I wasn't going to argue this..... Someone else probably will though. 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
Don't get pissy cowboy...

I already told you I wasn't going to argue this..... Someone else probably will though. 🙂

Ok I tell you what shall we calm down? Ok lets do a deal, I'll try not to get pissy, but the reason why im getting pissy is because I feel you are not making an effort. I thought my points were very logical all you seemed to do is just ignore them and smile at me. It sound like from the go you are just being patronising.

So i'll stop being pissy if you try to make an effort. 😐

Originally posted by Alfheim
Ok I tell you what shall we calm down? Ok lets do a deal, I'll try not to get pissy, but the reason why im getting pissy is because I feel you are not making an effort. I thought my points were very logical all you seemed to do is just ignore them and smile at me. It sound like from the go you are just being patronising.

So i'll stop being pissy if you try to make an effort. 😐

Originally posted by Galan007
I never said your points were illogical or necessarily wrong.... Just that I'm not going to argue them. 🙂

Well why not? Thats an important part of the argument, I thought we were here to discuss comics? If you dont want to debate an important point it seems like a cop out. Yes and you did imply that my points were wrong. I gave a reasonable explanation of what im saying and without analysing what I said you came to the same conclusion obvoulsy you didnt really read what I said.

If you're just going to leave half way thorugh debates when important points are made whats the point?

Originally posted by Alfheim
Well why not? Thats an important part of the argument, I thought we were here to discuss comics? If you dont want to debate an important point it seems like a cop out. Yes and you did imply that my points were wrong. I gave a reasonable explanation of what im saying and without analysing what I said you came to the same conclusion obvoulsy you didnt really read what I said.

If you're just going to leave half way thorugh debates when important points are made whats the point?

If you want to call me not wishing to debate this trivial point, a "cop out"...

Then go right ahead.... It won't bother me at all. 🙂