Can Love and Sex be Separate?

Started by Creshosk15 pages

Originally posted by Bardock42
Idiot.
Oh yes that was a very well thought out response. 🙄

Originally posted by Bardock42
I am not trying to be an ass. You disregarded and tried to discredit an opinion I agreed with and valued quite a bit with a wrong logical fallacy. The cool thing about logical fallacies is that you don't have to quote them. intelligent people would realize regardless...you just get the brainless masses to agree with you, it's just a very dirty debating tactic, that's why I never just state that's a logical fallacy, I point out why something is logically wrong. If you can do that with bdm's post I invite you to do so, I doubt it, since it was rather intelligent and sensible though.

Guess you are just trying to be an ass then aren't you?

Originally posted by inimalist
ummm... wrong?
So a person being affraid of a puppy is logical?

Originally posted by Creshosk

Guess you are just trying to be an ass then aren't you?

he gets off on it.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Oh yes that was a very well thought out response. 🙄

Guess you are just trying to be an ass then aren't you?

So a person being affraid of a puppy is logical?

Or...maybe I did not once state that emotions have to be logical and you are just an idiot not realizing that?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Or...maybe I did not once state that emotions have to be logical and you are just an idiot not realizing that?
Originally posted by Bardock42
Emotions are illogical? When did you redefine them that way?

Originally posted by Creshosk
Idiot.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Idiot.

By asserting in the form of a question "Emotions are illogical?" It's clear that you disagree with the assertation: "Emotions are illogical."

So you are indirectly asserting ""Emotions are not illogical." Well that's a double negative, so to fix that fault we remove both negative modifiers.

"Emotions are logical."

Now, you've had several chances to clarify what you really think like say with a modifier""Emotions are sometimes illogical." or "Emotions are illogical to a degree."

instead you choose to be asn ass by calling the other person an idiot, because they can't read your mind.

"Or...maybe I did not once state that emotions have to be logical and you are just an idiot not realizing that? "

Which does actually negate your assesment of not trying to be an ass. Because clearly you're not trying to be civil about this.

I await either your one liner assesment of "Idiot." a better explination as to your thoughts on the logistics of emotions, or a better explination as to why you feel that I'm an idiot. The former and the latter will both show you to be the ass that you claim you're not.

Disagreeing with "Emotions are illogical" does not equal "Emotions are logical".

Idiot.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Disagreeing with "Emotions are illogical" does not equal "Emotions are logical".

Idiot.

Ass

Originally posted by Creshosk

So a person being affraid of a puppy is logical?

I don't think logical is the term you are looking for, but yes

every emotional experience you have is HIGHLY adaptive and rational.

Originally posted by inimalist
I don't think logical is the term you are looking for, but yes

every emotional experience you have is HIGHLY adaptive and rational.

I guess there is such thing as a rational fear... Hmm...

Originally posted by Creshosk
I guess there is such thing as a rational fear... Hmm...

The girlfriend of one of my friend's father has a very weird fear of radiation. So bad that she wont let him keep a microwave in the house. He got boots from the Ukraine that she wouldn't let them keep for fear that they had been contaminated at Chernobyl. Totally illogical, just given how I interpret the word, but rational, justified and adaptive (if not in a strict social setting).

LOL, and the last thing you want to do is tell here that the TV produces more radiation than the microwave...

Originally posted by Creshosk
I guess there is such thing as a rational fear... Hmm...

I'd be scared in having sex with a woman that was HIV+; that's rational.

Originally posted by inimalist
The girlfriend of one of my friend's father has a very weird fear of radiation. So bad that she wont let him keep a microwave in the house. He got boots from the Ukraine that she wouldn't let them keep for fear that they had been contaminated at Chernobyl. Totally illogical, just given how I interpret the word, but rational, justified and adaptive (if not in a strict social setting).

LOL, and the last thing you want to do is tell here that the TV produces more radiation than the microwave...

I guess it'd be a bad thing to tell him that everything emits radiation to some degree?

Originally posted by Robtard
I'd be scared in having sex with a woman that was HIV+; that's rational.
Yes, yes that is.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I guess there is such thing as a rational fear... Hmm...

Oh my me, does that mean Bardock was right all along again? It seems to be such a common occurrence nowadays, but it still brings tears of joy to my eyes.

Originally posted by Creshosk
I guess it'd be a bad thing to tell him that everything emits radiation to some degree?

her, but yes 🙂

actually, I feel I should step back from "every emotional experience you have" now that I am thinking about panic and anxiety disorders and phobias. A lot of times they are caused by neurological problems, but they would be neither rational or adaptive, however, they are logical (logical only if they were due to some sort of physiological thing)...

wow...

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh my me, does that mean Bardock was right all along again? It seems to be such a common occurrence nowadays, but it still brings tears of joy to my eyes.
Nope. You were an ass all along though.

In order to have been right you would have had to state an opinion other than simply disagreeing with what was presented.

Originally posted by inimalist
her, but yes 🙂
Whoops, misunderstood. Sorry.

Originally posted by Creshosk
Nope. You were an ass all along though.

In order to have been right you would have had to state an opinion other than simply disagreeing with what was presented.

Whoops, misunderstood. Sorry.

You: Emotions are illogical
Me: When did that happen?
You: So you are saying emotions have to be logical.
Me: Idiot
You: Ass
Me: Think about it. I just stated what you said was wrong that emotions do not have to be illogical. Idiot.
Someone else: Yeah they can be logical in this and this case.
You: I agree

Me: **** you, idiot.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh my me, does that mean Bardock was right all along again? It seems to be such a common occurrence nowadays, but it still brings tears of joy to my eyes.

"Oh me, oh my".

Originally posted by Bardock42
>>A bunch of ass[b]hole blither removed.<<[/B]

yawn

Did anybody hear anything? It sounded like a very loud fart.

Originally posted by Creshosk
yawn

Did anybody hear anything? It sounded like a very loud fart.

Frustrating.

e

Originally posted by Robtard
"Oh me, oh my".
No, what I said.