Oh hell I'll post it then:
Originally posted by King_Mungi
Oh hell I'll post it then:
That list is so wrong.
It doesn't even have Cap-tits-magee-America.
I'll give this to Liefield: His style fits in perfectly with the over-the-top schlock of early 90's comic writing....the ones where giant guns, boobs, and pecs seemed to be the norm. Even Spidey (or more usually, his villains) suffered from it from about '92 to '98.
Of course, that's essentially saying his bad art fits bad writing well. But meh.
In any case, he should've stopped back then. Maybe he'd still have a rep left in the business.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
I'll give this to Liefield: His style fits in perfectly with the over-the-top schlock of early 90's comic writing....the ones where giant guns, boobs, and pecs seemed to be the norm. Even Spidey (or more usually, his villains) suffered from it from about '92 to '98.Of course, that's essentially saying his bad art fits bad writing well. But meh.
In any case, he should've stopped back then. Maybe he'd still have a rep left in the business.
Spidey...
With pouches?
Originally posted by Soljer
Spidey...With pouches?
Nah, but his villains always looked liked Roid-raged "X-treme" versions of what comic artistry should be. The Clone Saga happened during that era too...just bad times.
I remember an old Death's Head II ploy (I think it was multiple titles of Marvel UK) where they'd put "PUMPING IRON!" on the cover to let readers know that stereotypical muscle-bound males were galavanting through the pages. Sad times, though fortunately the writing (and usually art) didn't suffer as much as some of the American stuff (like the X-Men or Cable :barf: ). But it could've only happened in the 90's (I think the "PUMPIN IRON" tour was circa '94).
Dude's worse than Hitler.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Dude's worse than Hitler.
Originally posted by Deathstroke
Does it make me a bad person if I think some of those paintings are actually pretty good? 🙁
No, Hitler was a fairly good artist. But his attempts to draw human beings were utterly warped. In fact if you look at his architecture drawings with people in them most have their backs turned. His nudes show a focus on the eyes at the expense of the other features.
If I had to guess I would say he probably had some sort of face blindness (along with everything else)
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No, Hitler was a fairly good artist. But his attempts to draw human beings were utterly warped. In fact if you look at his architecture drawings with people in them most have their backs turned. His nudes show a focus on the eyes at the expense of the other features.If I had to guess I would say he probably had some sort of face blindness (along with everything else)
Originally posted by DigiMark007
I'll give this to Liefield: His style fits in perfectly with the over-the-top schlock of early 90's comic writing....the ones where giant guns, boobs, and pecs seemed to be the norm. Even Spidey (or more usually, his villains) suffered from it from about '92 to '98.Of course, that's essentially saying his bad art fits bad writing well. But meh.
In any case, he should've stopped back then. Maybe he'd still have a rep left in the business.
The 90's were the Golden Age of hacks.
See Rob Liefeld's Bloodwulf.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
No, Hitler was a fairly good artist. But his attempts to draw human beings were utterly warped. In fact if you look at his architecture drawings with people in them most have their backs turned. His nudes show a focus on the eyes at the expense of the other features.If I had to guess I would say he probably had some sort of face blindness (along with everything else)
Or maybe he was just EVIL. crackers