I have a question for athiests.

Started by Quiero Mota14 pages

You honestly believe that during the height of the death camps in the 40's, that he was a devout, practising, believing Catholic? 🙄

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
So, he wasn't a good Catholic, but he was baptised a Catholic.

He was raised into religion just like Stalin. And just like Stalin, he abondoned his religion in his adulthood, for something he viewed as better.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
You honestly believe that during the height of the death camps in the 40's, that he was a devout, practising, believing Catholic? 🙄

No, but he was not an atheist.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
He was raised into religion just like Stalin. And just like Stalin, he abondoned his religion in his adulthood, for something he viewed as better.

But I think Stalin was an atheist.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
You honestly believe that during the height of the death camps in the 40's, that he was a devout, practising, believing Catholic? 🙄
If he felt he was doing God’s work in his own twisted mind yes, if he believed in a god or religion then he wouldn’t be an Atheist.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
No, but he was not an atheist.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
He was raised into religion just like Stalin. And just like Stalin, he abondoned his religion in his adulthood, for something he viewed as better.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota

I bet he's (Hitler that is) in heaven with god 😆

Originally posted by Da Pittman
If he felt he was doing God’s work in his own twisted mind yes, if he believed in a god or religion then he wouldn’t be an Atheist.

If. That's extremely doubtful anyways.

Stalin was a confirmed athiest and he's responsible for way more death than Hitler. His lack of belief in any god had a lot to do with his motivations.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
I bet he's (Hitler that is) in heaven with god 😆

I certainly hope not. 😂

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I certainly hope not. 😂

Would you complane to god if he was there when you get there?

I'm certain he isn't there.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I'm certain he isn't there.

Why to dodge the question. 😛

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Why to dodge the question. 😛

Ok then; yes, I would complain.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Stalin was a confirmed athiest and he's responsible for way more death than Hitler. His lack of belief in any god had a lot to do with his motivations.
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
Ok then; yes, I would complain.

😆 Thank you for your honesty. I know how hard that question is, because you don't want to piss off god.

Originally posted by Quiero Mota
If. That's extremely doubtful anyways.

Stalin was a confirmed athiest and he's responsible for way more death than Hitler. His lack of belief in any god had a lot to do with his motivations.

Even with Stalin it was more about the power of the church and the influence that it had over the people than it was about god, he wanted absolute control and religion interfered with that. As for Hitler you could say because of his actions he was not Catholic but by his words he would still believe twisted or not.

Also how was Stalin a "confirmed" Atheist?

Actually, it's not really a bad thing that churches wanted some influence in state policy. It only became a problem when the power went to the papacy's head.

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Actually, it's not really a bad thing that churches wanted some influence in state policy. It only became a problem when the power went to the papacy's head.
Wanting and having are two different things and which church should have power in the government?

Originally posted by Da Pittman
Wanting and having are two different things and which church should have power in the government?

Re-read what I posted, I never mentioned that the church should have power. I'm talking about the early church's attempt at power. 😬

Originally posted by Sandai Kitetsu
Re-read what I posted, I never mentioned that the church should have power. I'm talking about the early church's attempt at power. 😬
Well I re-read it and didn't see that statement in the post but that it wasn't a bad idea that the churches wanted power/influence in government. If the “power” didn’t get to them would it still be a good idea that they had influence in government?

Originally posted by Da Pittman
Well I re-read it and didn't see that statement in the post but that it wasn't a bad idea that the churches wanted power/influence in government. If the “power” didn’t get to them would it still be a good idea that they had influence in government?

I don't see what good the church could do know. Times have certainly change, and it's a bit outdated.