I read somewhere else that when the sergeant moved to arrest Craig, he got out a card signifying him as a U.S. Senator and said "What do you think about that?"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/27/AR2007082701235.html?hpid=topnews
Originally posted by Robtard
I couldn't care less that he wanted anonymous gay-sex, but there are indecency laws for a reason, otherwise people would be having sex in front of pre-shools.
Yeah, I can just picture it ...
Also I see nothing wrong with sex in front of pre-schools.
Not that I believe that would happen.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, I can just picture it ...Also I see nothing wrong with sex in front of pre-schools.
Not that I believe that would happen.
That was just an example... I'm just saying, there are places where you shouldn't have sex, that's what the laws are there for. A public restroom is well, "public", go find someplace else more private to ****. I'm sure this guy could afford a van with tinted window and some sound insulation, if he's into the whole doing it in public thing.
Best aprt about it though, he is a strong anti gay-rights advocate; here is having anonymous gay-sex.
Are you actually serious about seeing nothing wrong with people having sex in front of little children, especially not their own children, or are you just saying that, for the sake of saying that?
Re: Re: Neocon senator busted for being a pervert
Originally posted by Devil King
He should be arrested for this alone. I'd hate to be the next guy to go in there. You'd think a senator would know better than that.
I doubt he went into the stall to relieve himself, but then decided to initiate something with his stall partner. I'm thinking he went in there for the sole purpose of fondling another man's package.
Re: Re: Re: Neocon senator busted for being a pervert
Originally posted by Robtard
I doubt he went into the stall to relieve himself, but then decided to initiate something with his stall partner. I'm thinking he went in there for the sole purpose of fondling another man's package.
I'm sure that's why it was included in the report. I just thought it was funny.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Neocon senator busted for being a pervert
Originally posted by Devil King
I'm sure that's why it was included in the report. I just thought it was funny.
Though come to think about it, it would be even funnier if he factually was in mid "pinch" while he was trying to fondle some other guys balls.
Originally posted by Devil King
He should be arrested for this alone. I'd hate to be the next guy to go in there. You'd think a senator would know better than that.
There's something about the juxtaposition of acts that is violently soul-sickening.
Unless it's two or more Japanese* females.
*Not a deal-breaker.
Originally posted by Darth_Erebus2
OH GOOD GOD! Who ****ing cares?
His constituency for starters.
Originally posted by Darth_Erebus2
I could ignore it but my response is showing my frustration at the never ending "your busted political sex scandals".. . . Why do people ignore what's really important and always seem interested in what is basically non shit.
It is important that a United States senator who twice supported a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, and voted against extending the Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act and the Federal Hate Crimes Bill to include "gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation," is having sex with men in public restrooms. He is a hypocrite of the highest order and should be removed from office.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
His constituency for starters.It is important that a United States senator who twice supported a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, and voted against extending the Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act and the Federal Hate Crimes Bill to include "gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation," is having sex with men in public restrooms. He is a hypocrite of the highest order and should be removed from office.
I am not advocating his behavior.
And I wonder, I saw this video b/c it was linked to a comment on you_tube, and it's funny he too speaks of hypocrisy, but only relative to his own interests. According to him, all women are going into slavery, but he's not a woman, so what does he care. He wants all women into slavery mainly for not living according to the moral code, which I argue below is based on men who were adulterous, same person who wrote against adultery, would you want to hurt David or Abraham or Solomon? The three men that are very important to Jews, Muslims, Christians. Let's not talk about spirituality, just the issue of the ones writing moral code and their personal life.
If you watch the link, the person is stating that "all women are going into slavery".
if you wold like to, FF to 1.10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IONSx5-mkL4
The person who wrote the bible, the chapter of Psalm/Proverbs, he committed adultery with Bathsheba (David) or was the son of that product (Solomon). Oh, and so did Abraham, he slept with Sarah's hand picked test-tease, Hagar, and sent that lady homeless and God heard her cry for help b/c she was being oppressed.
Your argument is based on judging hypocritical leaders based on their moral right to pass laws, but we have slavery that was in this country, and some men wrote so many confusing things, sometimes, for it and not owning slaves, and sometimes against it, while owning slaves and don't forget about the bible, which is also a book of moral code, which parts of the old testament, the books of both proverbs and psalms, were written by the person who came from an adulterous relationship. David and Solomon were public officials, as well as religious leaders. But all women are going into slavery, for what he argues? Oh, the moral code. This man is being ridiculed for his hypocrisy, as if that's new. We obey a lot of laws that are written by the men who break them, and that goes far beyond the time line of America's birth.
See, if you argue that this person is a hypocrite b/c he passed laws against his own character, well, so did men of the bible/Torah/Muslim books that share the old testament. Funny how that works. Oh, and the old testament also asks us not to ridicule a person while they are "down", uhm.
the thing about stigmatism, it puts a person backwards and they now have to over come all those other negative issues associated with it, in order to progress to something positive. just think of every blue dot as another label that is under the category assigned to you, so if it's crazy, every blue dot would be, as follows, unbalanced, stupid, loser, beneath others, etc. so replace every blue dot with an negative adjective that is associated with the original negative claim, and that person has to now work harder to pass "null"/zero or a clean slate, and work toward the positive, their goals, vision, ambitions, etc.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
It is important that a United States senator who twice supported a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, and voted against extending the Federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act and the Federal Hate Crimes Bill to include "gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation," is having sex with men in public restrooms. He is a hypocrite of the highest order and should be removed from office.
"Bill Clinton is probably a bad nasty naughty boy." - Sen. Larry Craig circa 1999
I like how the commentators on FOX are talking about his resignation like it's a tragedy for the Republican party...not because he's an ebarrassment to them, but because he's been such a stalwart leader within the party. Now they're saying he's handling it all with dignity. Like there's some dignity to be found in getting caught looking for bathroom sex. What kind of an idiot would find any dignity in bathroom sex?
"I can't do anything about what you people believe" was his attitude. He basically envoked 9/11, and then said that he felt leaving was the best descision so that the Senate could get back to dealing with terrorism and the war. (because they were doing a bang-up job before he walked into that bathroom and started rubbing ankles with an undercover cop in the stall next to him.)
What a lame-ass excuse.
He got caught. Now he has to live with it.
It's not even just the bathroom sex part that's so scandalous. It's also the fact that he's been against Gay-Rights his entire career, and now we find out that he's Gay himself...what a shocker.
Another Ted Haggard...Republican Party is looking like the biggest joke right now.
Originally posted by SpearofDestiny
He got caught. Now he has to live with it.It's not even just the bathroom sex part that's so scandalous. It's also the fact that he's been against Gay-Rights his entire career, and now we find out that he's Gay himself...what a shocker.
Another Ted Haggard...Republican Party is looking like the biggest joke right now.
Regardless if he's gay or not... his stance on "Gay-Rights" isn't affected, as he's doing what he thinks is best for the country, regardless of his own [wrongful] desires.
That's the excuse, he's unselfish and thinking of more than himself. That, or it was just all a mistake and he pleaded guilty to make it go away, because he isn't gay and he just has a wide stance when taking a shit..blah...blah...blah, it was a all a mistake and/or trap. /end Republi-Con spin cycle.
Originally posted by Robtard
Regardless if he's gay or not... his stance on "Gay-Rights" isn't affected, as he's doing what he thinks is best for the country, regardless of his own [wrongful] desires.That's the excuse, he's unselfish and thinking of more than himself. That, or it was just all a mistake and he pleaded guilty to make it go away, because he isn't gay and he just has a wide stance when taking a shit..blah...blah...blah, it was a all a mistake and/or trap. /end Republi-Con spin cycle.
He just reminds me of Ted Haggard. Like I already said, he got what was coming to him.
I sincerely have very little, tiny, sympathy for a person who makes a career out of attacking people and then gets in trouble for it.
If the same thing/s happened to Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Bill O Reilly, or Shirley Phelps Roper, I would also think they'd deserve what was coming to them, because they simply brought it upon themselves.
And no, I'm not being anti-republican biased either...
I love Bill Maur, but in all honesty, in his constant and persistant attacks against Bush and the Republicans alike, he brought his career blow to himself. Even if Bush and other Republicans deserve to be bashed, the person who is doing the bashing will (in my beleif) absorb like Karma.
I've heard so many Liberal Comedians who have made very insensitive attacks against people like Micheal Jackson, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Anna Nicole Smith, etc. People who really didn't deserve to be attacked to that extent.
Famous Rappers who continue to brag and preach about violence and macho domination over women and other men, have almost always found themselves in trouble which they could not sneak thier way out of. Good for them....they should also reap what they sew.
And, yes, even my fellow Gay men and women who attack other people as well, and make others feel bad about the way they look, dress, act, or whatnot....they're only bringing more hatred upon themselves that way. Which is one of the reasons I am annoyed by most forms of Gay Media.
My point is, I dont care that Larry Craig attacked Gays, and is or isn't Gay himself.
The point is someone spent thier lifetime attacking someone else, and now they drowned themselves so deep in this hostility that it came back to bite them on the ass. That goes for anyone who involves themselves in unnecessary conflicts.
One of the reasons I have tried to be more understanding with Christians and Muslims.