Originally posted by Reverend Axel
Yeah, you got me there. I don't remember saying I didn't. And I still fail to realize what this has to do with anything. IMO
Originally posted by StrangeloveGood god, is there an echo in here?
That's not the point. The point is that the number of posts that a thread has doesn't make it any better than another thread.I'm sorry, buddy, but you're wrong.
Originally posted by Strangelove
That's not the point. The point is that the number of posts that a thread has doesn't make it any better than another thread.I'm sorry, buddy, but you're wrong.
Wasn't talking to you ermm
And yes, it still does in a sense.
Btu seriously, this thread still fails.. You even should realize that 馃槓
Originally posted by Vinny ValentineI wasn't saying that this thread was good; quite the contrary, I also think it sucks. But when you brought the number of posts into the discussion, you became wrong.
Wasn't talking to you ermmAnd yes, it still does in a sense.
Btu seriously, this thread still fails.. You even should realize that 馃槓
Originally posted by Strangelove
I wasn't saying that this thread was good; quite the contrary, I also think it sucks. But when you brought the number of posts into the discussion, you became wrong.
No, I became wrong in a sense I admit... But Post count still has meaning on the thread value in certain aspects.
Originally posted by StrangeloveI actually don't think he is wrong.
I wasn't saying that this thread was good; quite the contrary, I also think it sucks. But when you brought the number of posts into the discussion, you became wrong.
At most it would be an invalid argument. It wouldn't make him wrong per se.
Originally posted by Vinny ValentineThe ability of a thread to get attention neither adds nor detracts any value from a thread.
No, I became wrong in a sense I admit... But Post count still has meaning on the thread value in certain aspects.
A really good thread made at like 6 in the morning will get very few posts and eventually die. A decent thread made at about 4 in the afternoon can get over 100 posts in a day. Is the second thread better than the first? No.
Originally posted by Bardock42True. My bad.
I actually don't think he is wrong.At most it would be an invalid argument. It wouldn't make him wrong per se.
Originally posted by Strangelove
The ability of a thread to get attention neither adds nor detracts any value from a thread.A really good thread made at like 6 in the morning will get very few posts and eventually die. A decent thread made at about 4 in the afternoon can get over 100 posts in a day. Is the second thread better than the first? No. True. My bad.
It's all biased to whether or not a thread is good or not... It differs from each person.. But the main point he was saying was my threads idea's sucked.... Because I said this sucked...
Threads made a 4am in the morning can last to the next day and longer too if it's good... I've made them at that time and they've gone on much longer then that ermm Timezones differ and such...
I still feel thread post count can value to whether it's a good thread... In a sense it's good that people are interested enough to continue going there... You ... know what I mean?