The war on morality

Since the war in Iraq, we now have an issue of religous war, and we have to prove that we aren't infidels, in order to show that we are under the same/similar system of control as the radical Muslisms.

This is playing out in our policies and "catching" political scandals, etc.

Do you think that the radical Muslims are correct in their behavior toward other Muslims? (sounds silly, but if we are going to go in a serious moral law, we are going to be using some other group to measure ourself)

Do you think that it's the problem solving that's the issue? Or is it poverty (sense of lack of control)?

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Since the war in Iraq, we now have an issue of religous war, and we have to prove that we aren't infidels, in order to show that we are under the same/similar system of control as the radical Muslisms.

This is playing out in our policies and "catching" political scandals, etc.

Do you think that the radical Muslims are correct in their behavior toward other Muslims? (sounds silly, but if we are going to go in a serious moral law, we are going to be using some other group to measure ourself)

Do you think that it's the problem solving that's the issue? Or is it poverty (sense of lack of control)?

That's it? Only a single cause to this "problem" and two possible choices, "Problem Solving" or "Poverty"? Dumb.

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Since the war in Iraq, we now have an issue of religous war, and we have to prove that we aren't infidels, in order to show that we are under the same/similar system of control as the radical Muslisms.

This is playing out in our policies and "catching" political scandals, etc.

Do you think that the radical Muslims are correct in their behavior toward other Muslims? (sounds silly, but if we are going to go in a serious moral law, we are going to be using some other group to measure ourself)

Do you think that it's the problem solving that's the issue? Or is it poverty (sense of lack of control)?

What? 😕

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Since the war in Iraq, we now have an issue of religous war, and we have to prove that we aren't infidels, in order to show that we are under the same/similar system of control as the radical Muslisms.

This is playing out in our policies and "catching" political scandals, etc.

Do you think that the radical Muslims are correct in their behavior toward other Muslims? (sounds silly, but if we are going to go in a serious moral law, we are going to be using some other group to measure ourself)

Do you think that it's the problem solving that's the issue? Or is it poverty (sense of lack of control)?

yet another forum turd

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Since the war in Iraq, we now have an issue of religous war, and we have to prove that we aren't infidels, in order to show that we are under the same/similar system of control as the radical Muslisms.

This is playing out in our policies and "catching" political scandals, etc.

Do you think that the radical Muslims are correct in their behavior toward other Muslims? (sounds silly, but if we are going to go in a serious moral law, we are going to be using some other group to measure ourself)

Do you think that it's the problem solving that's the issue? Or is it poverty (sense of lack of control)?

It is h ow most people do solve there promblems.Not a good thing but what could we do about it.It is how the world is now adays.It has nothing to do wiht control at all.jm

Originally posted by ADarksideJedi
It is h ow most people do solve there promblems.Not a good thing but what could we do about it.It is how the world is now adays.It has nothing to do wiht control at all.jm

well, they see the problem is with morality, and so, they think we are infidels with respect to morality. morality for them is mainly in the family or relationships, to the point of killing someone for adultery or affairs or their daughters for not marrying a tribal guy around the corner, that's a strong system of control. they would rather be poor and control the "morality" of family values, then anything else, so they are sacrificing for what they see as a greater goal, to the point of murder.

we are in a moral war, then we are obligated to put each other under that kind of moral law, in order to demonstrate that we are not infidels. I am not advocating anarchy or doing bad things, I am generally against affairs and other relationship issues, and wouldn't advise it. However, based on what is going on with the morality-war (in their eyes), maybe our culture is getting stricter in order to prove our equality, they value family, meaning they will kill their daughers if she refuses to marry a guy from the same tribe or whatever, that's pretty radical. and it's arranged marriages to show loyality and MORALITY.

MORALITY= control over= SEX and RELATIONSHIPS

they call us infidels b/c they are attacking our sense of morality. their own equivalent are the ones who uphold family values, do you see the picture?

They would rather be poor and control the "morality" of family values, then anything else, so they are sacrificing for what they see as a greater goal, to the point of murder and submitting to poverty (osama living without just to fight the morality issues of the USA or entire non-Muslim countries).

I don't see how her inferences connect

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Since the war in Iraq, we now have an issue of religous war, and we have to prove that we aren't infidels, in order to show that we are under the same/similar system of control as the radical Muslisms.

This is playing out in our policies and "catching" political scandals, etc.

Do you think that the radical Muslims are correct in their behavior toward other Muslims? (sounds silly, but if we are going to go in a serious moral law, we are going to be using some other group to measure ourself)

Do you think that it's the problem solving that's the issue? Or is it poverty (sense of lack of control)?

I think this thread is much better than the crazy moronic talk that you present all the time. If I try to look at this thread objectively (Meaning I have no idea who you are and what you have posted, I would consider the person who posted this thread an average poster.)

The problem with radical jihad Muslims is that they are radical jihad Muslims. If the world was filled with a bunch of atheists, I think it would be a much better place. Dumb ass religion pisses me off so much. We wouldn't have these asinine dumb asses destroying the shit out of each other all the time if they didn't have their shit ass idiotic piece of shit religions. (And in case anyone thinks I am directing this at just Muslims, shut the hell up you assuming bastard; I am referring to Christians, Jews, etc. etc. I must say, though, that I don't really find very many things wrong with Buddhists.)

My opposition to religion is weird, considering that I am a religious person myself. However, I NEVER impose my religion on someone AND I strongly believe in "Separation of Church and State". To me, religion is like a hobby just like video games. I wouldn't kill someone over losing a match in capture the flag so why would I kill someone for telling me my religion is stupid? (And before any of you arguing bastards think to say it, I KNOW THAT THE RELIGIOUS FEUDS INVOLVE GENERATIONS OF MURDER IN THE NAME OF THEIR GOD!!!)

Originally posted by dadudemon
I think this thread is much better than the crazy moronic talk that you present all the time. If I try to look at this thread objectively (Meaning I have no idea who you are and what you have posted, I would consider the person who posted this thread an average poster.)

Did you miss the part where she concluded that the "problem" must either be A) or B)?

Originally posted by Robtard
Did you miss the part where she concluded that the "problem" must either be A) or B)?

Nope, sure didn't. I see closed minded people post all the time here.

Hence my use of the word "average".

wait

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
wait

*waits*

Originally posted by dadudemon
I think this thread is much better than the crazy moronic talk that you present all the time. If I try to look at this thread objectively (Meaning I have no idea who you are and what you have posted, I would consider the person who posted this thread an average poster.)

The problem with radical jihad Muslims is that they are radical jihad Muslims. If the world was filled with a bunch of atheists, I think it would be a much better place. Dumb ass religion pisses me off so much. We wouldn't have these asinine dumb asses destroying the shit out of each other all the time if they didn't have their shit ass idiotic piece of shit religions. (And in case anyone thinks I am directing this at just Muslims, shut the hell up you assuming bastard; I am referring to Christians, Jews, etc. etc. I must say, though, that I don't really find very many things wrong with Buddhists.)

My opposition to religion is weird, considering that I am a religious person myself. However, I NEVER impose my religion on someone AND I strongly believe in "Separation of Church and State". To me, religion is like a hobby just like video games. I wouldn't kill someone over losing a match in capture the flag so why would I kill someone for telling me my religion is stupid? (And before any of you arguing bastards think to say it, I KNOW THAT THE RELIGIOUS FEUDS INVOLVE GENERATIONS OF MURDER IN THE NAME OF THEIR GOD!!!)

dadud, you still sore over that "rat and empathy" thread, I moved on since that love.

"Average", Dadudemon?

Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
dadud, you still sore over that "rat and empathy" thread, I moved on since that love.

😆 Not in the least. 😆 My world does not revolve around you, Czarina. I am never really upset with you, seriously. I would have to be a real loser to be upset over your posts because you really are a nice person.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Average", Dadudemon?

I don't understand your question. Elaborate.

Originally posted by dadudemon
😆 Not in the least. 😆 My world does not revolve around you, Czarina. I am never really upset with you, seriously. I would have to be a real loser to be upset over your posts because you really are a nice person.

I don't understand your question. Elaborate.

After her "you still sore blah, blah, blah" response, would you like to reevaluate your initial response of "average"?

Originally posted by Robtard
After her "you still sore blah, blah, blah" response, would you like to reevaluate your initial response of "average"?

That's what I thought you meant but in all fairness, you are not always what you seem(Pretty damned whitty) and I really could have interpreted that in more than one way.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's what I thought you meant but in all fairness, you are not always what you seem(Pretty damned whitty) and I really could have interpreted that in more than one way.

the robtard is always witty.

Originally posted by Robtard
the robtard is always witty.

and very humble 😛

Originally posted by dadudemon
and very humble 😛

Second that