Originally posted by sithsaber408
No, no.I wasn't implying that.
Rather, I was trying to say that a network exec wouldn't look at any of th PT as risk to put on TV. They were profitable fims.
They might be considered "sucky" by some, maybe even said exec... but they still made have enough fans that it would be a smart move.
well in that case i agree.
A studio exec might also realize that this was a galvanized film that was awesome during the hype, then once the hype died down people realized how bad it was. First time I went to the theater to see ROTS, I walked out going "OMGOMGOMGOMG that was amazing" like the dumb little fanboy I am. I went again the next day and realized that there wasn't really anything to this film at all. Just pretty effects and Natalie Portman.
On that note, how can any director make Natalie Portman give a bad performance? Well George seemed to pull it off.