Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Well if you want me to believe that you're not a racist jeb end, it is.
Labeling. That type of oppression works on some folks, esp. those who are into emotionalism, they only need the labels, and it becomes a complete sentence, and after that, all oppression starts to take place (their projecting their feelings of all things wrong and will then attack that person with the same amount of rigor they suspect would be done to them). So, for example, if someone stated any pejorative word "xyz", to someone who doesn't think, it's a complete sentence. For someone who thinks, it's only a label and open to scrutiny, such as motivation, intentions, rational (past knowledge of the individual), etc. Words like "racist" can invoke emotionalism all on its own, which can make it a complete sentence in the emotional aspect of the word, esp. among those who don't think for themselves. If a person is open to reason, they are usually going to be careful about conjuring a label upon another person, unless the label is used to sensor the person, and that's when name calling becomes an ad hominem strategy to crush the actual person instead of the arguments.
Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Well if you want me to believe that you're not a racist jeb end, it is.
If you think I did any of those things simply b/c they are minorities, you don't know me. If you think I argued for whites simply b/c they are white, you don't know me. When either person argues about something, I pick what makes sense to me, and I argue on their behalf, has nothing to do with race at all, it has to do with the ideology. So, yeah, I argue for poor whites who felt misplaced, as much as I argue for Hispanics (yet, I am hispanic), as much as I argue for inner city youth. Race never mattered when it came to action, esp. against the liberty of another person or group (murder, telling people who they can or can't associate with - that's against our constitutional right, stealing their property, etc.). If people feel like their liberty was taken away, and they happen to be a race, I will argue for the folks, even veterans, and yes, I've argued for them as well, as well as truck drivers as well as N. Indians. Stop labeling people so that emotional people will bother them.
Here's a great example, if you watch the clip, you'll understand what I mean:
And please don't look at the race, please see the CONCEPT:
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Here's a good example.When I was a little girl (about the age of 10), I was going to a Christain School camp in upstate NY. As the bus drove away, I heard something that said I would never see my mother again, and I started to cry and have a fit. Well, I begged to be let off the bus, but the adults just thought I missed my mom and was acting up and I told them what I heard and they said that God doesn't talk to people. I understand them now, but as a kid, I really heard it.
In camp, I stayed to myself, but there was this one colored girl who wanted me to be her friend, and I didn't respond to her, and she turned everyone against me.
Well, three days before camp was over, I was in church. That same girl sat right next to me (I didn't mind it BUT), she SAT ON MY ENERGY, MEANING, I COULDN'T MOVE, I lost my free will to move away from her. And she didn't want me to clap with everyone and she was very controlling. (that's the master-slave game in energy). Before the service was over with, I saw a image and that image told me that my mom was already dead. I turned around to tell her what I saw, and she reported to me that I was crazy. And I told her, no, I heard and saw something say this to me. And she just told me to ignore it and she kept clinging on to me for something. (maybe a spiritual vampire, sucking someone's energy or ideas???).
Either way, that night, I decided to forget about it. And in the morning, the paster came to pick me up early, all the kids wondered why I was leaving so early and what happened. And they found out that I wasn't crazy, I knew I heard that, and I wanted to be with my mom b4 she died, but the main idea is that someone was sitting on my energy to control me, and I felt it, and I didn't like it, but she was benefiting somehow, and she tried to use race as guilt to keep me from leaving her side, all awhile, I couldn't move.
It's strange, and I pray that I'm the only person who has gone thru this and that no one else can imagine it or understand it, b/c it's truly bazaar to have someone try to control you in energy or thoughts, it's like being a slave.
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Putting labels on an individual so that you can play master over that person's image? Slave or servant to you, based on your words? I'm not into that, I do not place labels on individuals, nor do I subscribe to them. And I shouldn't have had to show that email, that's not an embarrassment to me, that's an embarrassment to the folks like yourself. People should do good and it should be left for themselves, not for the world, or otherwise. I would never ask someone to prove to me something about themselves, it's up to them to find their goodness and project it to the world, not for me or anyone else to invoke labeling on that person. I am for the individual, not into groups at all.Labeling. That type of oppression works on some folks, esp. those who are into emotionalism, they only need the labels, and it becomes a complete sentence, and after that, all oppression starts to take place (their projecting their feelings of all things wrong and will then attack that person with the same amount of rigor they suspect would be done to them). So, for example, if someone stated any pejorative word "xyz", to someone who doesn't think, it's a complete sentence. For someone who thinks, it's only a label and open to scrutiny, such as motivation, intentions, rational (past knowledge of the individual), etc. Words like "racist" can invoke emotionalism all on its own, which can make it a complete sentence in the emotional aspect of the word, esp. among those who don't think for themselves. If a person is open to reason, they are usually going to be careful about conjuring a label upon another person, unless the label is used to sensor the person, and that's when name calling becomes an ad hominem strategy to crush the actual person instead of the arguments.
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
If you think I did any of those things simply b/c they are minorities, you don't know me. If you think I argued for whites simply b/c they are white, you don't know me. When either person argues about something, I pick what makes sense to me, and I argue on their behalf, has nothing to do with race at all, it has to do with the ideology. So, yeah, I argue for poor whites who felt misplaced, as much as I argue for Hispanics (yet, I am hispanic), as much as I argue for inner city youth. Race never mattered when it came to action, esp. against the liberty of another person or group (murder, telling people who they can or can't associate with - that's against our constitutional right, stealing their property, etc.). If people feel like their liberty was taken away, and they happen to be a race, I will argue for the folks, even veterans, and yes, I've argued for them as well, as well as truck drivers as well as N. Indians. Stop labeling people so that emotional people will bother them.
Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Some of the stuff Czarina says is incomprehensible and totally unintelligible, although a 'Word Salad' to me sounds pretty tasty. I'm feeling hungry for a fruit salad now...
Yeah, I felt the same thing when I opened a physics book, totally incomprehensible and unitelligable, until I read it again and again, and thought about it, then, CERTAIN things started to make sense.
Oh, and the recent attacks, in energy/spirit, hasn't come from anyone of color, actually, they've come from white females. And as of today, I finally got it, they are under a strong system of control; to be skinny, look cute, and be white, and they MUST produce out of their own kind. So, I'm a dark spot in the equation, so I can see the frustation and need to attack and vicisousness, as an empath, I felt it like neddles, very bad energy, just felt prickly in energy anytime I would glance at someone who was white, and this has been happening for about 2 weeks now. But the actual attacks have been from white females who are attractive, it made me wonder why they would need to attack someone like ME, I can see someone who isn't attractive attacking females like that, but someone who is already attractive, that doesn't make sense... so, it didn't register that they are under a strong control to produce UNTIL NOW. I feel badly for them, sure, they are much better off financially and mostly they look nice, but, they are under a rigid system, they would have to be to attack me that way in energy.
Originally posted by Czarina_Czarina
Yeah, I felt the same thing when I opened a physics book, totally incomprehensible and unitelligable, until I read it again and again, and thought about it, then, CERTAIN things started to make sense.Oh, and the recent attacks, in energy/spirit, hasn't come from anyone of color, actually, they've come from white females. And as of today, I finally got it, they are under a strong system of control, to be skinny, look cute, and be white, and they MUST produce out of their own kind; so, I'm a dark spot in the equation, so I can see the frustation and need to attack and vicisousness, as an empath, I felt it like neddles, just felt prickly in energy anytime I would glance at someone who was white, and this has been happening for about 2 weeks now. But the actually attacks have been from white females who are soooo cute, so, it didn't register that they are under a strong control to produce. I feel badly for them, sure, they are much better off and mostly they look nice, but, they are under a rigid system, they would have to be to attack me that way in energy.
Just to be clear, "nigerism" and "Blacks" are no longer your Arch-nemesis; "controlling-skinny-white-females" are?