Why do we let one or two posters ruin the forum?

Started by Ranger Smith32 pages

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Never been banned.

You're thinking of that other guy.

-AC

So how does that work as you seem to have numerous disagreements. Many caused by your combative phraseology and sentence structure, at least so it appears to a neutral looking in.

Originally posted by Ranger Smith
So how does that work as you seem to have numerous disagreements. Many caused by your combative phraseology and sentence structure, at least so it appears to a neutral looking in.

Been around, y'all. Been around.

Seen some thangs, heard some thangs.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Been around, y'all. Been around.

Seen some thangs, heard some thangs.

-AC

O.K. do you p.m. with a lot of mods in a friendly way? I've noticed some people who troll here are really sycophants in disguise. It would upset me if this was the case with you as you are more talented than many of the perma trolls at KMC and have some intelligence.

Originally posted by Ranger Smith
O.K. do you p.m. with a lot of mods in a friendly way? I've noticed some people who troll here are really sycophants in disguise. It would upset me if this was the case with you as you are more talented than many of the perma trolls at KMC and have some intelligence.

My banner says "Ultraman".

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
My banner says "Ultraman".

-AC

Cool.

🙂

That posters have my name in the same line as Czarina Czarina's does bother me. For that is like putting M.L.K.'s name and Al Sharpton's name in the same idealism category.

We are in no way alike as wrong as you all may think I am in saying that. She's euphoric and in desperate need of sociopsychological help. It's clearly obvious that I'm much more of a realist than she is. (that's if she even was one.)

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
That posters have my name in the same line as Czarina Czarina's does bother me. For that is like putting M.L.K.'s name and Al Sharpton's name in the same idealism category.

MLK and Al Sharpton? I'd say more Willis and Arnold, myself.

Originally posted by Devil King
MLK and Al Sharpton? I'd say more Willis and Arnold, myself.

Or more like you and Gene Simmons.

If AC is referring to himself never being banned, he's lying.. He and I got into a disagreement back a while ago and he kept rambling on and one of the mods came in and warned us, I backed off, AC didn't, AC got a 3 day vacation from KMC. It actually happened here in the GDF forum. I also think that was when he was added to my perma-ignore list.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
If AC is referring to himself never being banned, he's lying.. He and I got into a disagreement back a while ago and he kept rambling on and one of the mods came in and warned us, I backed off, AC didn't, AC got a 3 day vacation from KMC. It actually happened here in the GDF forum. I also think that was when he was added to my perma-ignore list.

He admitted earlier in the thread that he has been banned.

As for moderators "ruling with bias" and whatnot... well, of course. It's utterly ridiculous and naive to even think that moderators are perfect. They are all Humans, Humans are not infallible, Humans make plenty of mistakes daily. So of course, they will ban someone because they simply got pissed at them, or because they annoyed a friend of theirs. And the one's that debate frequently can/have taken very, very subtle jabs that provoked their opponents and then warned them; some will dismiss you based on actions taken years ago because it's "on your record".

No one is perfect.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
If AC is referring to himself never being banned, he's lying.. He and I got into a disagreement back a while ago and he kept rambling on and one of the mods came in and warned us, I backed off, AC didn't, AC got a 3 day vacation from KMC. It actually happened here in the GDF forum. I also think that was when he was added to my perma-ignore list.

A) It's a joke. He's a troll, I was giving him a dose of his own medicine and as a result, ended my altercation with him faster.

B) If you're going to address me, it's cowardly to do so from your ignore list.

C) If you care to remember, as everybody who witnessed it will, you posted a picture which I genuinely complimented you on. You immediately threw abuse at me because you took it as me being sarcastic and insulting you. When I requested an apology and explained I wasn't being sarcastic, you continued to insult me and throw abuse at me. It was my continual asking for an apology that got me banned, as opposed to you throwing massive abuse in a situation that didn't call for it.

Everyone who saw it considered it bs, a terrible decision, and you were lucky to get away with it (Yes, even by getting an alleged warning you still got away with it). Since you INITIALLY broke rules by flaming, for no reason at that, and continued to. You should have been banned right away, since you broke the rules aggressively, for no reason and continued to even after I clarified what I said, and all I did was suggest that you should say sorry for getting it wrong.

-AC

Originally posted by Dreamt
He admitted earlier in the thread that he has been banned.

As for moderators "ruling with bias" and whatnot... well, of course. It's utterly ridiculous and naive to even think that moderators are perfect. They are all Humans, Humans are not infallible, Humans make plenty of mistakes [b]daily. So of course, they will ban someone because they simply got pissed at them, or because they annoyed a friend of theirs. And the one's that debate frequently can/have taken very, very subtle jabs that provoked their opponents and then warned them; some will dismiss you based on actions taken years ago because it's "on your record".

No one is perfect. [/B]


I'm not speaking of that, I'm speaking of the last post on the previous page.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
I'm not speaking of that, I'm speaking of the last post on the previous page.

Stop discussing me if you have no interest in reading my posts, please.

-AC

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
I'm not speaking of that, I'm speaking of the last post on the previous page.
Stop discussing him if you're not going to read his posts.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Or more like you and Gene Simmons.

Dumb ass; Gene Simmons is in KISS. You're thinking of Richard Simmons.

Originally posted by Devil King
Dumb ass; Gene Simmons is in KISS. You're thinking of Richard Simmons.
😆

Originally posted by Dreamt
Stop discussing him if you're not going to read his posts.

Maybe I just like the truth to be told, that's all.

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
Maybe I just like the truth to be told, that's all.

Then tell it. Tell exactly what happened. Anybody with sense and presence here knows I have been banned, it was a joke.

If you're going to go into WHY, then do it honestly. You got lucky, if I was banned, you sure as hell should have been. The mod who banned me was a friend of yours at the time, and somehow the fact that you threw intense abuse was overlooked because you adhered to a warning, where as me civilly and calmly asking for a deserved apology in spite of a mod ODDLY warning me not to do so, was worthy of a banning.

Moreover, if you were banned when you should have been banned, right about the time you were throwing rabid, needless abuse (A.K.A; from the start), I wouldn't have had to keep asking, civilly, for an apology, and I wouldn't have had a ban on my record.

That's the truth as it happened and as many people will remember it. Tell it right or don't tell it.

-AC

Originally posted by Kelly_Bean
Maybe I just like the truth to be told, that's all.

Read his ****ing post. He said he was joking, and it was pretty clear to me before he spelled it out for you that he was. Stop trolling.

Aww, is the KMC paparazzi getting to you, AC?