Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional?

Started by Bardock426 pages
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then everyone should say "under Gods". 😆

That implies that there are multiple.

Originally posted by Bardock42
That implies that there are multiple.

Ya, and it would piss off any fundy next to you. 😆

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Ya, and it would piss off any fundy next to you. 😆

Nah, Hindu fundies would get a blast out of it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nah, Hindu fundies would get a blast out of it.

Is there such a thing? 😕

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Is there such a thing? 😕

Well....probably?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Is there such a thing? 😕

All religions have fundies.

Most cerintainly. There is a large Hindu fundamentalist movement, just not so much in the US.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then everyone should say "under Gods". 😆

It still implies there are gods.

The pledge should be returned to the historic "One Nation Indivisable"

and the National motto returned to "E Pluribis, Unum"

And its no wonder that the nation is falling apart. These to phrases are needed more now than ever. Too bad we've forgotten about them and have replaced them with the politically motivated, non-representative, mythological statement about "god."

God loves you Alliance, even if no one else does 😛131

Originally posted by Alliance
Most cerintainly. There is a large Hindu fundamentalist movement, just not so much in the US.

It still implies there are gods.

The pledge should be returned to the historic "One Nation Indivisable"

and the National motto returned to "E Pluribis, Unum"

And its no wonder that the nation is falling apart. These to phrases are needed more now than ever. Too bad we've forgotten about them and have replaced them with the politically motivated, non-representative, mythological statement about "god."

I wouldn't care one way or the other. Words are just words. It all depends on what people do with them.

"These words [“under God”] will remind Americans that despite our great physical strength we must remain humble. They will help us to keep constantly in our minds and hearts the spiritual and moral principles which alone give dignity to man, and upon which our way of life is founded." -Dwight Eisenhower when he had "under god" added to the pledge in 1954.

131wank

It's awesome that's an issue, when every year, close to 1/3rd of 18 year olds do not finish high school.

Re: Re: Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional?

Originally posted by Alliance

The pledge should be retruned to its ORGINAL and HISTORIC text and not some bastardized cold war legisislation of fear.

Those damn Knights of Columbus!

I feel it was merely a gimmick to seperate us from the godless commies back in the 50's.

Edit: Also it doesn't specify which god it was recognizing, which is most likely for the benefit of allowing the people to associate their own god with the nation, which means that it isn't favoring a specific religion. The only people it would be unconstitutional to are atheists.

Originally posted by Impediment
"These words [“under God”] will remind Americans that despite our great physical strength we must remain humble. They will help us to keep constantly in our minds and hearts the spiritual and moral principles which alone give dignity to man, and upon which our way of life is founded." -Dwight Eisenhower when he had "under god" added to the pledge in 1954.

131wank

How is that superior to "one nation indivisable?" Especially when that specific "under God" phrase was in itself divisive?

tsk tsk

Originally posted by fini
tsk tsk

😆 I could just see you wagging your finger. 😆

*nuh uh gurlfriend*

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Words are just words. It all depends on what people do with them.

That would be exactly his point.

Originally posted by Devil King
That would be exactly his point.

Should I disagree with him because of who he is?

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Should I disagree with him because of who he is?
Well, yeah...to be honest.