Smackdown Vs Raw 2008

Originally posted by Bloinky
I know but I still think he should be in it still.

Chris Benoit was a friggin cool wrestler. Unfortunately, he was also a child murdering roid-freak. Jerkoff killed his little son fer chrissake. So no, he shouldnt even be mentioned by the wwe ever again.

It's a good game but I don't like how long it takes in this one to get a created superstar to perfect stats.

is this better than 2007...,is there still a story mode?

Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
lol... I haven't played a good wrestling game since smackdown on PS1

this one is to suddenly reclaim the throne?

Originally posted by brainchild81
That throne has always belonged to the Aki games. (WWF: No Mercy & Wrestlemania 2000 for the N64, Def Jam: Vendetta & Fight 4NY on PS2) Smackdown games are basically crap w/good graphics.

QFT.

The THQ (Aki?) games are tight as hell. No Mercy was the peak, imo, but the control scheme and depth was light-years beyond the competition even in their earliest forays into wrestling games (WCW/NWO World Tour, Revenge, etc.)

How the hell do i push people out of the ring in a royal rumble? Everytime i attempt to push people out, no matter what buttons i press or which sticks i tilt. It isnt until another competitor assists me, that their grip meter begins to go down

The loading screens for this game are almost as bad as PS1 games. Not only do they take forever, but you have to sit through two before and after every match

Originally posted by DigiMark007
QFT.

The THQ (Aki?) games are tight as hell. No Mercy was the peak, imo, but the control scheme and depth was light-years beyond the competition even in their earliest forays into wrestling games (WCW/NWO World Tour, Revenge, etc.)