Entropy Aegis vs The Asgardian Destroyer: Special Match

Started by Sirius773 pages

You keep up.

Wtf are you talking about?

You claim that the Aegis is only Entropy? What are you smoking?

Really, it is Apocalypse tech mixed with the Power of Imperiex.

So yes, it IS BOTH. So, stop trying to be a smart ass and read comics, and do the math yourself.

That last post had me so branfused, I was branfuzzled.
😕

I never claimed that the Aegis is only the power of Imperiex and none of Apok.....

You first need to up your reading comprehension, and then learn how to debate.

Take Soljer to class with you.

Originally posted by Harry Fingerman
That last post had me so branfused, I was branfuzzled.
😕

BRANIAC !

Last I checked, Imperiex had the power of the big bang, not Entropy.

Originally posted by UniOmni
I never claimed that the Aegis is only the power of Imperiex and none of Apok.....

You first need to up your reading comprehension, and then learn how to debate.

Take Soljer to class with you.

Awww, someone is angwy.

Not angry.

I only get slightly perturbed when someone says i'm something, that i'm not.

A fanboy of a company or some such nonsense.

Originally posted by UniOmni
I never claimed that the Aegis is only the power of Imperiex and none of Apok.....

You first need to up your reading comprehension, and then learn how to debate.

Take Soljer to class with you.

Then if in fact you "knew" that trickster was saying that the Aegis
had the full power of Imperiex, then why did you counter his argument?

You make no sense. Perhaps you should go debating school.

Also.. lol, just curious. What exactly about my "reading comprehension"
do I have to "up"? You were the one disputing the Aegis possesing the
full power of Imperiex.

Originally posted by UniOmni
Not angry.

I only get slightly perturbed when someone says i'm something, that i'm not.

A fanboy of a company or some such nonsense.

When did I say you were a fanboy?

Originally posted by UniOmni
Not angry.

I only get slightly perturbed when someone says i'm something, that i'm not.

A fanboy of a company or some such nonsense.

🙄

Originally posted by Sirius77
Then if in fact you "knew" that trickster was saying that the Aegis
had the full power of Imperiex, then why did you counter his argument?

You make no sense. Perhaps you should go debating school.

Also.. lol, just curious. What exactly about my "reading comprehension"
do I have to "up"? You were the one disputing the Aegis possesing the
full power of Imperiex.

People who can't comprehend simple sentence structure are extremely tedious.

I never said that the Aegis didn't have the full power of Imperiex.

See, the thing is, i'd NEVER verbally take that stance myself, since it makes not one lick of sense in the scheme of things.

Aegis is the true power of Imperiex.....goes to fight Brainiac, who's harnessed the fullpower of Imperiex inside of Warworld?

I'd never make myself sound so stupid so adamantly.

This all started because Trickster Priest said that the Aegis possesses the power of New God tech, plus the Power of Imperiex plus the power of Entropy....

And i said, Silly trickster Priest, Imperiex is Entropy.

You say what, and i'm not gonna finish because i already broke it down before.

Trickster Priest saying the Aegis possessed the full power of Imperiex and Entropy, is the same thing as someone saying Thanos via some tech, now possesses not only the full power of Galactus, but the Power Cosmic as well............

Do you see anything wrong with the sentence above?

I mean, call me a smartass if you want, but better that than the other end of the spectrum.

It really shouldn't be this hard.

Originally posted by Soljer
When did I say you were a fanboy?

You didn't.

I was just giving you an example of something that might irritate me.

Originally posted by UniOmni
People who can't comprehend simple sentence structure are extremely tedious.

I never said that the Aegis didn't have the full power of Imperiex.

See, the thing is, i'd NEVER verbally take that stance myself, since it makes not one lick of sense in the scheme of things.

Aegis is the true power of Imperiex.....goes to fight Brainiac, who's harnessed the fullpower of Imperiex inside of Warworld?

I'd never make myself sound so stupid so adamantly.

This all started because Trickster Priest said that the Aegis possesses the power of New God tech, plus the Power of Imperiex plus the power of Entropy....

And i said, Silly trickster Priest, Imperiex is Entropy.

You say what, and i'm not gonna finish because i already broke it down before.

Trickster Priest saying the Aegis possessed the full power of Imperiex and Entropy, is the same thing as someone saying Thanos via some tech, now possesses not only the full power of Galactus, but the Power Cosmic as well............

Do you see anything wrong with the sentence above?

I mean, call me a smartass if you want, but better that than the other end of the spectrum.

It really shouldn't be this hard.

No, it shouldn't. Why didn't you just say that instead of making an unfunny joke?

Also, you pretty much just said what trickster did.

You agreed with me when I said it was Apocalypse tech, and Apocalypse tech is New God tech. Also, it does have the power of Entropy, and the full power of Imperiex, because it can channel all of Imperiex's power.

Now... that wasn't so hard, now was it? That was all that you had to say.

NO, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!!

It's a silly(*and stupid)thing to imply there's a difference between Entropy and Imperiex.

Imperiex is the embodiment of Entropy. To have the power of Imperiex is to have the power of entropy.

The only thing to come of making a separation between the two, is needless confusion.

Stop it.+

This is a stupid argument.

How can the full power of Imperiex be Entropy when he actually has the power of Creation?

Originally posted by UniOmni
NO, YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG!!

It's a silly(*and stupid)thing to imply there's a difference between Entropy and Imperiex.

Imperiex is the embodiment of Entropy. To have the power of Imperiex is to have the power of entropy.

The only thing to come of making a separation between the two, is needless confusion.

Stop it.+

Ahem, Imperiex is the big bang. Not Entropy, unless someone can show me I'm wrong.

**** it, Avalon needs to make a respect thread for that thing. He's the only person on here that I know has scans. srug

How about people who've read the book?

And question.....

How is the Aegis gonna down a single Celestial, let alone a group of them when it was destroyed when John Henry burned it out destroying Doomsday on Apokolips?

Is defeating DD>>defeating a Celestial?

Low showing.

It almost soloed the Quintessence.

Originally posted by UniOmni
How about people who've read the book?

And question.....

How is the Aegis gonna down a single Celestial, let alone a group of them when it was destroyed when John Henry burned it out destroying Doomsday on Apokolips?

Is defeating DD>>defeating a Celestial?

Talk about pure misinterpretation...

Darkseid owned Steels soul and returned it to Superman exactly as he got it...without the Aegis armor.

He basically unbound John's soul from the Armor...