Originally posted by Kurashthen you didnt read the whole thing. ill respond to you after the judges decide on this. i guessed you missed all of Thanos feats I laid out.
yes it went in circlesthe beginning it was actually a lot smoother than i thought it would be, but through the middle quan did exactly as i thought hed do . . .
play the superman card and play it often . . . over and over again, thank god i didnt judge cause it didnt prove anything
Originally posted by quanchi112
then you didnt read the whole thing. ill respond to you after the judges decide on this. i guessed you missed all of Thanos feats I laid out.
acutally i read the entire thing, and yes i did find that you did a good job in some parts, but i thought you played the superman card way to much
Originally posted by Kurashnevr and i went back and forth about supes. also note he brought him up first. i used it to back up my theory that ds is lacking in durability.
acutally i read the entire thing, and yes i did find that you did a good job in some parts, but i thought you played the superman card way to much
Originally posted by Desaad
i skimmed the thing a bit.while i didn't agree with a lot of his points, and there were a lot of places that i personally would have refuted/called him on, quanchi was the winner so far as I could see it.
as much due to nvr's ineptitude as anything though.
You could always challenge him?
I've seen you post quite a few times, and you definitely seem way more knowledgeable about 'Seid than Nvr.
And Quanchi's always up for backing Thanos...
Originally posted by Desaad
i skimmed the thing a bit.while i didn't agree with a lot of his points, and there were a lot of places that i personally would have refuted/called him on, quanchi was the winner so far as I could see it.
as much due to nvr's ineptitude as anything though.
I'm so glad your opinion doesn't matter.
Originally posted by Desaad
i thought i wasn't allowed to post in that thread? every time someone posted, they were asked to stop.
It's a little much to explain all at once, but there is this thing here called the "Battlezone," where a poster can challenge another poster to a one on one debate.
That thread was devoted to their battlezone - their one on one debate.
You could do similarly - challenge Quan to a one on one battlezone, pick some judges, pick a 'time limit' and go at it.
Originally posted by Desaad
i skimmed the thing a bit.while i didn't agree with a lot of his points, and there were a lot of places that i personally would have refuted/called him on, quanchi was the winner so far as I could see it.
as much due to nvr's ineptitude as anything though.
You skimmed it a bit and have the ****ing nerve to say I was inept. How about reading the whole damned thing first.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
You skimmed it a bit and have the ****ing nerve to say I was inept. How about reading the whole damned thing first.
i don't have to keep my hand on a hot stove for 20 minutes to determine it is hot, or rub my nose in cow poop to know that it stinks.
i'll read the whole thing when i have time, but from my skim it seems that a lot of quanchi's points were not properly addressed, and you didn't refute enough of his thanos feats, in large part because you obviously don't have a wealth of knowledge on the character.
Originally posted by Desaad
i don't have to keep my hand on a hot stove for 20 minutes to determine it is hot, or rub my nose in cow poop to know that it stinks.i'll read the whole thing when i have time, but from my skim it seems that a lot of quanchi's points were properly addressed, and you didn't refute enough of his thanos feats, in large part because you obviously don't have a wealth of knowledge on the character.
Originally posted by Soljer
It's a little much to explain all at once, but there is this thing here called the "Battlezone," where a poster can challenge another poster to a one on one debate.That thread was devoted to their battlezone - their one on one debate.
You could do similarly - challenge Quan to a one on one battlezone, pick some judges, pick a 'time limit' and go at it.
interesting.
thanks for the information.
i might have time to do this this weekend, but i doubt he wants to argue the same thing again so soon!
probably don't have the energy to write as much as those too anyway.
still, might be fun.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
There wasn't a feat he posted about thanos that I didn't refute. Sorry you didnt' take the time to read it all before you put your foot in your mouth. And he certainly didn't dispute my reasoning. I even beat him to the punch on the superman thing, which was his main stchick. Now cool it.
i've been cool from the beginning. you are the one resorting to swearing and personal attacks.
you didn't refute certain points in the way that they should have been refuted, in the way you would have if you had read the issues in question. i won't go into detail because i don't want to influence the judges by demonstrating specifics points, but i'd be happy to take your issues one by one after a decision has been reached, if you so desire.
