Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Naturalism v. Theism
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Because all you know it the "Christian point of view". If you knew say Buddhism, you would be able to see the bias in the original post.
I'm not close minded. Ok, say "Baby Jesus" didn't create the universe...fine, something else did.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Naturalism v. Theism
Originally posted by Quiero Mota
I'm not close minded. Ok, say "Baby Jesus" didn't create the universe...fine, something else did.
I don't consider bias to mean closed minded.
For example: Was the universe created by god or by natural forces? That question has a bias to the idea that the universe was created. It does not give the option for the universe never being created.
Originally posted by lord xyzAs I've said before, little debbiejo doesn't have a sound card........crybaby
YouTube video
Could you print it out paragraph by paragraph for me...
debbiejo—
The video presented—in comedic form—a discussion between a Scientist and Creationist regarding Evolution and Intelligent Design; the overall tone of the presentation pokes fun at Intelligent Design—the Creationist view. Robin Ince—seemingly uneducated on both theories—humors himself (and his audience) at the expense of the Creationist view, that life/the cosmos were created by "Magic Man." I think Robin Ince has a weird sense of humor.
Originally posted by ushomefree
debbiejo—The video presented—in comedic form—a discussion between a Scientist and Creationist regarding Evolution and Intelligent Design; the overall tone of the presentation pokes fun at Intelligent Design—the Creationist view. Robin Ince—seemingly uneducated on both theories—humors himself (and his audience) at the expense of the Creationist view, that life/the cosmos were created by "Magic Man." I think Robin Ince has a weird sense of humor.