Originally posted by Robtard
The question is, would he rant and rave about how evil the "White Man" is and vomit all his B.S. he has shown in here time and time again in public? I highly doubt it.
I've known Mexicans, Blacks and Natives who do it often in bars and at the workplace. So maybe. But in the case of FOTN, I think he just uses the internet as means to vent his racism. I really can't see him obtaining his college degree that he has by causing a scene in classes for four straight years.
Originally posted by Devil King
No argument. But, truly, what's the point of being all badass on the internet? Everyone agrees with the notion of your mouth not writing checks your ass can't cash. However, where is the redeemptive quality in puffing yourself up on a website? Maybe that sounds like bullsh*t, but it's the truth. I think I'm pretty acurately representing myself on this website. But, you guys have no common frame of reference to draw from when making that assesment. No one here knows me in the real world, not anymore. So getting all eTough is a waste of time. There's a difference between calling someone out or cussing them for saying this or that, but where's the logic in even getting into the "I'll kick your ass" or "step to that sh*t, Bit*h!" mindest?As long as you're yourself, no one can really fu*k with you.
I agree that it's pointless to be a badass on the internet, but if the indivual is one in real life, then at least they're keeping it real.
And cussing has nothing to do with it; a five-year-old can cuss. Actions speak louder than words, which again, are impossible on the net, which goes back to the whole thing about being pointless.
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, I disagree. They are real according to the circumstances. In fact it might be better if they could say the something in case to someone on the street, but fear makes them unable to do that. Well, on the internet the strong and scary person doesn't have the advantage and will either have to listen to it or ignore it.Socking is certainly the wrong terminology though.
And why do you disagree? Do you lack in-person audacity?