Illadelph's Team Tournament Discussion Thread

Started by illadelph12133 pages

durpot

(You must not be a chronic smoker...)

Originally posted by illadelph12
durpot

(You must not be a chronic smoker...)

That was the lamest joke I've heard Ill 😛

Originally posted by Akuki
What's so special about 4:20?
420 is or at least was at one point in time the police code for crimes related to drug use. Particularly Marijuana. So therein the pot smoking culture decided to turn the time 4:20 into the best time to light up.

And No, I've never even seen marijuana or its paraphenilia in person.

Originally posted by Creshosk
420 is or at least was at one point in time the police code for crimes related to drug use. Particularly Marijuana. So therein the pot smoking culture decided to turn the time 4:20 into the best time to light up.

And No, I've never even seen marijuana or its paraphenilia in person.


Ah that explains it.

Anyways I'm feeling a lot better about our match now, it took me and Kandy awhile, but we finally settled down all the physics of our asteroid plan 💃

Well, I guess you are lucky you have only faced one of our amazing duo so far. Ill get my time in sometime tomorrow. Real life gave me a beating yesterday-today, but Ill be back into it by tomorrow 😈

Originally posted by Blair Wind
Well, I guess you are lucky you have only faced one of our amazing duo so far. Ill get my time in sometime tomorrow. Real life gave me a beating yesterday-today, but Ill be back into it by tomorrow 😈

We're eagerly looking forward to seeing what you have to say and then dismissing it as BS. 😛

Isn't it sort of cheap to have Trick send in his prep post after he gets to read Nvr's (I know he said he wouldn't but... ermm)? 😬

Originally posted by Akuki
We're eagerly looking forward to seeing what you have to say and then dismissing it as BS. 😛
The very essence of logical debate.

He apparently never read it...or something.

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
Isn't it sort of cheap to have Trick send in his prep post after he gets to read Nvr's? 😬
This was previously address. Anything that directly counters anything found in nvr's prep will be discarded.

He says he hasn't even looked at Nvr's opening post... and won't even talk about either it or what his write up is going to be...

Originally posted by Creshosk
This was previously address. Anything that directly counters anything found in nvr's prep will be discarded.
Ah, OK.

Originally posted by Akuki
We're eagerly looking forward to seeing what you have to say and then dismissing it as BS. 😛

QFT.

I actually don't go in expecting to try to debunk everything my opponent says. I try to remain a bit more level-headed and view it objectively, so I'm less biased when I do have to call things out as BS.

...but some of these plans are testing that resolve. The leaps of logic needed for, well, pretty much any of them are a bit astounding.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
I actually don't go in expecting to try to debunk everything my opponent says. I try to remain a bit more level-headed and view it objectively, so I'm less biased when I do have to call things out as BS.

...but some of these plans are testing that resolve. The leaps of logic needed for, well, pretty much any of them are a bit astounding.


At least you don't have to judge this shizzle. Lulz.

Originally posted by Val
At least you don't have to judge this shizzle. Lulz.

Hehe, true. I feel like the following argument might sway judges in half these matches:

"Wtf. That makes no sense. So we punch them in the face and win. Lulz."

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Hehe, true. I feel like the following argument might sway judges in half these matches:

"Wtf. That makes no sense. So we punch them in the face and win. Lulz."


Our first post had some big problems, but we've basically fixed them now in our later ones.

So there are two matches, and that argument works in one of them?

I think I can guess who's you're refering to...

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Hehe, true. I feel like the following argument might sway judges in half these matches:

"Wtf. That makes no sense. So we punch them in the face and win. Lulz."


I think I'm going to copy that slogan for Infinite feedback loop jubilee 1 million.

Originally posted by King Kandy
So there are two matches, and that argument works in one of them?

I think I can guess who's you're refering to...

Nah, either one really. It was just an expression that you guys took literally. Though I was amused that Akuki jumped in and defended himself when I never mentioned his team's strategy.

"For my next trick, I'll be building an Einstein-Heisenberg bridge through time and space, then pulling both quantum states of Schroedinger's cat out of a box. Prepare for ZOMBIE CAT!"

😉

Originally posted by DigiMark007
Nah, either one really. It was just an expression that you guys took literally. Though I was amused that Akuki jumped in and defended himself when I never mentioned his team's strategy.

"For my next trick, I'll be building an Einstein-Heisenberg bridge through time and space, then pulling both quantum states of Schroedinger's cat out of a box. Prepare for ZOMBIE CAT!"

😉


SHHHH!!! We're saving that strategy for the semifinals. 😛