Originally posted by King Kandy
So basicaly you come on, a church link in your sig, and proceed to bash the entire clinton family.Boy you sure are impartial.
I bashed nobody, I asked a question. (this is beginning to seep in, isn't it?)
Look at the thread title: "Is this true?"... not "TEH clIntonZ arE tEH sUk11"
Show me one place where I bashed anybody.
With my church link in my sig. 🙂
Re: Re: Is this true...?
Originally posted by Robtard
This Clinton "Death List" has been going on for ages... it's been debunked countless times, yet the Republithugs love to dust it off and give it ago whenever a Clinton is in the spotlight, as Hillary is now.
Seems like some democrat politician shouldn't have too much trouble turning this to Clinton's advantage without disproving the "facts."
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I bashed nobody, I asked a question. (this is beginning to seep in, isn't it?)Look at the thread title: "Is this true?"... not "TEH clIntonZ arE tEH sUk11"
Show me one place where I bashed anybody.
With my church link in my sig. 🙂
What has your church link to do with anything?
Originally posted by sithsaber408
No, rather he's stated the point of the thread over and over and it is ignored. (and beyond that, the purpose has been achieved anyway)Everything else is mud-slinging and projected motives that were never there. In other words.... nonsense.
But, whatever makes you feel better.
I'll be the "fascist" if that's what you all want to label me as because I asked a question.
(rather the opposite of fascism... don't you think?)
If the characterization is not true, then explain why I am still waiting for a response to the questions I posed to you in the Proposal Requires Straights to Have Kids or Marriages Will Be Voided thread:
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
You do not hate gay people, you do not want for gay people to be unhappy, and you do not want to devalue gay people, but you do not think that the relationships of gay people should be considered equal to the relationships of straight people.Civil unions and domestic partnerships only provide 350 of the 1,400 benefits and protections of marriage, and are not recognized from state-to-state, or by the federal government. Why should gay couples settle for a quarter when straight couples get a whole pie?
If you would like to discuss the nature of homosexuality, there is a 271 page thread devoted to the subject.
You will note that there is no conclusive evidence as to the cause of heterosexuality, yet this has never been cited as a sufficient reason to teach adolescents that heterosexuality is abnormal or to deny opposite-sex couples the right to marry. Why should homosexuality be held to a different standard?
Especially considering that the immutability of sexual orientation is irrelevant to whether or not same-sex couples, and the over one million children in the United States who are being raised by same-sex couples, deserve equal protection under the law as guaranteed to every American by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
Originally posted by Bardock42
T-the signature is automatically put under each of his posts.You won't find any of his posts without the church link.
True...but I think his point was the fact that he has changed since he put that up as his sig. Anything you found that was a flame, he could justify and say that that was before his sig was up, unless we had some sort of evidence on the actual date for when the sig was put up on his account.
Originally posted by dadudemonHe was a Christian Zombie (sorry, "born again"😉, before that sig went up though. Not sure what the sig should change.
True...but I think his point was the fact that he has changed since he put that up as his sig. Anything you found that was a flame, he could justify and say that that was before his sig was up, unless we had some sort of evidence on the actual date for when the sig was put up on his account.
Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If the characterization is not true, then explain why I am still waiting for a response to the questions I posed to you in the Proposal Requires Straights to Have Kids or Marriages Will Be Voided thread:
I don't know how many months ago that was Adam, but I'll gladly answer you in PM. My apologies, I probably had alot going on at work at the time and didn't get back to that thread.
Originally posted by Bardock42Nothing.
What has your church link to do with anything?
I was making a joke at the previous poster who said that I "Bashed the Clintons with my church-link in my sig."
I was saying I bashed nobody.
"With my church-link in my sig."
It was an after-thought, like you'd say: "With my mind on my money and money on my mind." 😛
Originally posted by dadudemonNever meant to infer that, but yes actually quite a bit has changed for me since I've gotten into full-time ministry.
True...but I think his point was the fact that he has changed since he put that up as his sig. Anything you found that was a flame, he could justify and say that that was before his sig was up, unless we had some sort of evidence on the actual date for when the sig was put up on his account.
(off-topic I know, but it seems that I am now the subject of the thread, as folks are quick to point fingers at openly Christian people and call them things like..."fascists", rather than post on-topic. Which of course would close the thread as the topic has now been answered.)
Originally posted by Zeal Ex NihiloCorrect.
Fortunately, sith didn't falsely accuse anyone.
A question was merely asked and was answered thoroughly.
Thank you all, and I'll be staying out of the GDF for good now. 🙂
Closing?
Originally posted by sithsaber408
I don't know how many months ago that was Adam, but I'll gladly answer you in PM. My apologies, I probably had alot going on at work at the time and didn't get back to that thread.
It has been 8 months and 25 days. Do not apologize, post your response in the thread in question.