Our 21st century is ridiculous

Started by Cheesebits2 pages

Our 21st century is ridiculous

Read the Holy Bible, mankind seemed so ridiculous, some have said.

What will we say about our century or our generation's contribution to it?

coke

Originally posted by anaconda
coke

21st cent is backwards

WTF does the bible have to do with anything? This thread doesn't make sense.

George W Bush being sworn in as president is the worst thing of the 21st century.

worst thing was the spetember 11th attacks 🙁 im not american but so many families must have lost their relatives

R.I.P

If Bush wasn't president it would have been avoided.

Originally posted by lord xyz
If Bush wasn't president it would have been avoided.

I hate Shrub too but that statement was just lame.

Well how about scientific, industrial and economic advancement? I'm pretty sure that we've contributed quite a bit, and will continue to do so.

Originally posted by Darth_Erebus2
I hate Shrub too but that statement was just lame.
Why? Bush was a lame duck before 9/11.

Originally posted by the welsh one
worst thing was the spetember 11th attacks 🙁 im not american but so many families must have lost their relatives

R.I.P

A joke.

That was certainly not the worst thing.

Iraq, Katrina, general bad weather, the US 2004 election, George Bush, other terrorist attacks, WW3 coming near?

Originally posted by lord xyz
Iraq, Katrina, general bad weather, the US 2004 election, George Bush, other terrorist attacks, WW3 coming near?
Yeah, and maybe the Tsunami that killed 230.000 people....😐

Originally posted by lord xyz
Why? Bush was a lame duck before 9/11.

Bush was no lame duck, unless of course you're addressing his personality. But, Bush was certainly no lame duck president. Even after the '06 elections, he still hasn't been treated as a lame duck. He gets everything he wants.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Yeah, and maybe the Tsunami that killed 230.000 people....😐
Oh yeah, that. That was also very bad.

Originally posted by Devil King
Bush was no lame duck, unless of course you're addressing his personality. But, Bush was certainly no lame duck president. Even after the '06 elections, he still hasn't been treated as a lame duck. He gets everything he wants.
Before 9/11. He did virtually nothing, but watch things go wrong. Then he went on vacation.

Originally posted by Devil King
He gets everything he wants.

That's because he threatens to hold his breath and cry if he doesn't.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Before 9/11. He did virtually nothing, but watch things go wrong. Then he went on vacation.

That doesn't make him a lame duck

Originally posted by lord xyz
Why? Bush was a lame duck before 9/11.

From Answers.com:

lame duck
n.

1.
1. An elected officeholder or group continuing in office during the period between failure to win an election and the inauguration of a successor.
2. An officeholder who has chosen not to run for reelection or is ineligible for reelection.
2. An ineffective person; a weakling.

---------------------------------------------------------

Shrug, it could work

Originally posted by Devil King
That doesn't make him a lame duck
I use the term lame duck literally. Someone who does nothing.

In American politics, the term Lame Duck means a president who has, through the victory of the other party in an election, lost his ability to push his agenda. This president, as Bardock pointed out, still gets what he wants. So, in america at least, the term does not apply.

Lame, now that's a term that applies.