Sin City: A Dame to Kill For

😬

i'm not freaking not, I suppose it is the internet people on here like to blow things out of proportion.

The thread title has been changed to accommodate the movie title change.

Thanks, Imped. Or do you prefer Imp? 🤨

I like Imp, but Imped will do in a pinch. 🙂

New pictures, feature Mickey Rourke, Jessica Alba & Joseph Gordon-Levitt

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=95234

I'm kind of excited to see this in 3D. I bet it'll be a natural fit.

I want the original Dwight back... 🙁

Originally posted by siriuswriter
I want the original Dwight back... 🙁

I keep seeing this brought up now

it does make the most sense given the character's background. In Miller's original comic book series, Dwight received surgical reconstruction on his face following the events of "A Dame to Kill For," which takes place before "The Big Fat Kill" story featured in "Sin City."

No Kevin?
That sucks 🙁

Jamie Chung As Little Miho

You'll always be MY Lil Miho, Kaz.

It looks like the studio reversed the decision to change the title from "kill" to "die".

A Dame to Kill for sounds much better, anyway.

YouTube video

F*** YEA! The trailer looks EPIC.

Nice, finally some footage from this! Looks good.

****'s sake, people need to learn to read on the internet

people flipping out thinking that Frank Miller is directing this.

Who thinks that? IMDB says Miller & Rodriguez, just like the first one.

Frank Miller IS directing this film, just like the first one.

Originally posted by Impediment
Frank Miller IS directing this film, just like the first one.

Because of the amount of scenes where actors were simply placed in front of a green screen, Rodriquez had Miller on set to explain to the actors what the scene was about & their motivation to say & do what they did.

Miller was more of a consultant, however Rodriguez felt he deserved a credit as "director" because of the amount of time Miller spent on set.

Originally posted by Patient_Leech
Who thinks that? IMDB says Miller & Rodriguez, just like the first one.

Just stupid comments elsewhere.

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Because of the amount of scenes where actors were simply placed in front of a green screen, Rodriquez had Miller on set to explain to the actors what the scene was about & their motivation to say & do what they did.

Miller was more of a consultant, however Rodriguez felt he deserved a credit as "director" because of the amount of time Miller spent on set.

Truth be told, son!

Frank Miller was a director in the sense of scenery and character motivation.

Robert was the guy who did all of the technical shooting and cinematography.

How is that NOT a co-directorship?