Condoms for Inmates.

Don't drop the soap!

Also...should tax payers money pay for them?

No.

Let them suffer.

Originally posted by B.A
No.

Let them suffer.

Or they could recycle and make them from Chinese Hair-bands.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Because people that smoked a joint deserve to get AIDS from a triple murderer called Bubba?

They do if they smoked my last joint's worth.

Anal rape (possibly involving a fire extinguisher) is the only punishment deemed suitable in that particular instance.

Dunno about the AIDS though... Its seems kinda..... Excessive.

I mean, its not like its Michael Bay and his ilk that we are talking about here.... 😛

Originally posted by Bardock42
Because people that smoked a joint deserve to get AIDS from a triple murderer called Bubba?

Tripple murder bubba usually doesn't go to the same prison as a minor drug offender Jenkins....unless minor drug offender Jenkins behaves poorly...Triple Murder Bubba gets to go to a low security prison IF he is approaching the end of his sentence or is getting rewarded for good behavior.

Of course, there are always exceptions..

You're skreet smart, are you?

No, taxpayers shouldn't pay for them.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Don't drop the soap!

Also...should tax payers money pay for them?

I think it's a good idea. Eventually some inmates get released back into society and the lesser the AIDS the better.

Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....

Originally posted by dadudemon
Tripple murder bubba usually doesn't go to the same prison as a minor drug offender Jenkins....unless minor drug offender Jenkins behaves poorly...Triple Murder Bubba gets to go to a low security prison IF he is approaching the end of his sentence or is getting rewarded for good behavior.

Of course, there are always exceptions..

You're skreet smart, are you?

Not sure what that is, but the point is that no one deserves being infected with AIDS. Not sure whether issuing condoms would help though, but if you put people in a secure place, stripping away their freedom, you should have the decency to ensure that getting AIDS is not one of the punishments, not necessarily because they don't deserve it, but because it is certainly unequal.

I think this is a good idea, we already pay for their housing, guarding, feeding, exercising etc., so why not this? It seems like a good investment in the bigger picture.

A question to you Bardock, do you think an AIDS infested, triple murderer name Bubba will bother to put on a condom before he forcibly sodomizes John "420" Dough?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Not sure what that is, but the point is that no one deserves to be RAPED in Prison

Fixed for ya Mister!

Originally posted by Robtard
A question to you Bardock, do you think an AIDS infested, triple murderer name Bubba will bother to put on a condom before he forcibly sodomizes John "420" Dough?

No.

He'll have John "420" Dough, do it for him.

With his mouth.

I doubt the rapist will take time to apply the condom.

Still, not a bad idea.

Originally posted by Röland
No.

He'll have John "420" Dough, do it for him.

With his mouth.

It was a rhetorical question; I only used Bardock's post as a segway to use the word "sodomy", but go on though...

Well I assume they'll buy the condoms themselves using the money, or 'credits' they earn from the work they do within prison. For instance making furniture: the prison can afford to give them an extremely measly wage - probably enough for two packs of ciggies and a porn mag a month, from the furniture that is sold to various companies.

Originally posted by WrathfulDwarf
Fixed for ya Mister!

Originally posted by Robtard
I think this is a good idea, we already pay for their housing, guarding, feeding, exercising etc., so why not this? It seems like a good investment in the bigger picture.

A question to you Bardock, do you think an AIDS infested, triple murderer name Bubba will bother to put on a condom before he forcibly sodomizes John "420" Dough?

Originally posted by Robtard
It was a rhetorical question; I only used Bardock's post as a segway to use the word "sodomy", but go on though...

That's all the further I can go.

You have to pay a monthly subscription to read the rest.

Originally posted by Bardock42
No, which is why I included the point that i don't know whether it would help (implying that I think it won't).

It was rhetorical, see above. I used you as a springboard.

Originally posted by Robtard
It was rhetorical, see above. I used you as a springboard.

From a lot of reported extra marrital encounters in the nick we hear about, If you were a prison rapist about to rape someone who may already have been made the ***** of someone else already, I think it'd make sense to not risk that infection right there.
If it is a multiple-person-assisted rape, the more discerning rapist could possibly have the freinds restrain you - who are waiting in line, waiting to have the next go. Then hes got all the time, if not the inclination, to roll on a Johnny.

From what is known about prison rape, it seems to indicate that there is "power/position-biased raping" as well as "sexually biased raping"...

So would someone already going into such an act in a cold, considered, maybe even sexually removed manner gonna have two thoughts neccesarily about wrapping for safety...?

Maybe there is more sanity to this that it would initially seem on paper.

(See, I left the word sodomy clear for you, Robtard.... Use the phrase, at will lol )