Hate Crime statistics, USA 2006

Started by Kinneary5 pages

Because 200 million whites and 3,000 crimes against blacks. And 30 million blacks, and 1,000 crimes against whites. Despite the fact that whites are six times larger, blacks commit roughly twice as many hate crimes proportionally.

And a black person is way, way more likely to be a victim of a hate crime. Which may explain why they aren't all that enamored with white folks.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Clowning? Go kill yourself.

Why are you even addressing me if all you're gonna do is talk smack to look and feel cool and smart in front of your e-friends at my expense. Man, don't answer it. It's just gonna escalate

Look, I Really don't feel arguing for posts and posts on end. So fall back.

Well, you are "clowning" around when you try and excuse a double-standard as anything but.

Why do you take everything personal, like a personal attack, when it isn't? Stop being such a whiny *****.

So, why are you alright with double-standards against whites? What possible justifications do/can you give?

Originally posted by ElectricBugaloo
And a black person is way, way more likely to be a victim of a hate crime. Which may explain why they aren't all that enamored with white folks.

You're ignoring the double-standards though, white-on-black crime is labeled a "hate crime", no matter the circumstances, in most cases.

3,000 out of 2,000,000 whites commit a "hate crime" against blacks; that sounds like a logical reason as to why blacks aren't "enamored" against whites, seriously? Sounds more like blanket racism.

Look at the 'Jena 6' as a recent example, whites commit a crime against blacks, it's a "hate crime", blacks commit a crime against whites, it's just a crime, and that is even under question.

Originally posted by Kinneary
Because 200 million whites and 3,000 crimes against blacks. And 30 million blacks, and 1,000 crimes against whites. Despite the fact that whites are six times larger, blacks commit roughly twice as many hate crimes proportionally.

At first, I wanted to point out the same thing you did, I even wrote up my post with all of my math with Bardock42 in mind. (Meaning, it was immaculate and the conclusions were sound....)

However, there was one thing that threw a wrench into the works that caused me to delete that entire post and rewrite my entire post....it was a rhetorical question....

Why do all the racist crimes against whites have to be committed by only blacks?

After I thought about the data and the above question, I realized that I was falling into the same mind set that the perpetrators of these crimes have...

I realized that a crime on a "white" person could actually be committed by a Mexican, Puerto Rican, Japanese, Indian, etc. Why does it ONLY have to be African Americans who commit those crimes? In the same light, why does it ONLY have to be a white person to commit the crimes against African Americans?

Therefore, your point of view is flawed, just the same as my original point of view was flawed before I corrected it.

I actually feel relieved that someone else pointed out that point of view so that I could point out that I was going to point that out so I could point out why I didn't point it out in the end. 😆

You can't, but the best assumption you can draw is that an equal proportional number of whites and blacks attacked each other. Which is the basis of the statement.

Originally posted by Robtard
Well, you are "clowning" around when you try and excuse a double-standard as anything but.

Why do you take everything personal, like a personal attack, when it isn't? Stop being such a whiny *****.

So, why are you alright with double-standards against whites? What possible justifications do/can you give?

I'm not trying to use anything for an excuse. On the other hand people use the "double standard" term as an excuse to say, or use really, the "N" word liberally.

The extent of the word far outweighs any White persons' ability to say it freely because of the DS issue, even when considering equality and/or the "DS" excuse cause it just doesn't sound right because of past and contemporary history, the associations with the word, and merely because it'd "jokingly" come out the mouth of the very same people whom used the word to physically torture, socially mutilate and mentally maim for a really long, long time in this country.

Imagine your mother harshly whipping you and a sibling as, lets say 10 yr. olds, whipping the both of you till you guys saw purple, while calling the both of you, i dunno, "stinky". That day traumatized the both of you cause it was beating of your lives. Yet you and your sibling joke about it cause you went through it together and poke fun at how loud the other one was and can relate and even call each other "stinky" as a term of endearment as a reminder of the significant bond you have because of what you both went through. Lets say a couple of years later she jokingly mentions the lashing to you guys while humorously saying the work "stinky". You'd wanna double-clothesline her with all your might, 90's wwf style, over the top rope, if she wasn't your mother. DS or w/e, she just can't say it cause it doesn't sound right. It's not funny. No matter the delivery. To much shit involved in that issue for it to be a laughing or a casual matter.

As unfortunate as this sounds to you, there are no loopholes Whites can jump through when it comes to saying the "N" word whilst trying to be light-hearted or humorous about it or trying to make it sound funny via a joke. And that's your races' fault. Not Blacks.

Whiny *****.

;]

Originally posted by FistOfThe North

As unfortunate as this sounds to you, there are no loopholes Whites can jump through when it comes to saying the "N" word whilst trying to be light-hearted or humorous about it or trying to make it sound funny via a joke. And that's your races' fault. Not Blacks.

Lets get one thing straight, love.

If you call yourself a moron, I will call you a moron. Get that?

You call yourself a n****r, then you'll be called a n****r. I don't buy into ''we can say it but you can't'' bullcrap.

You call yourself that, you WILL be called that. End of bloody story.

Originally posted by KidRock
3 White guys jump and rob a black guy just for his money and they are caught..hate crime charged.

Y did they hat him

Originally posted by Lemon Meringue
Y did they hat him
He slept with their wives.

Was also black.

I actually expected more anti-semetism.

My sweetheart gets alot of shit for being Jewish.

Originally posted by Captain King
I actually expected more anti-semetism.

My sweetheart gets alot of shit for being Jewish.

Maybe she's just a *****?

She's the sweetest girl in the world.

Nice chest too lol!

Everyone's just afraid of jews. We can't all be God's chosen people. Jealous pricks lol.

I swear, when I introduced her to my family who's all anti-semetic democrats it was just like Adam Sandler's Waterboy.

Democrats: Dat girl's da' devil!

CK: She not da' devil! She da' the prettiest girl in da' world! And I saw her titties, and I liked them too!

😆

B-big Evil?

Actually only surprised the numbers aren't higher

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Lets get one thing straight, love.

If you call yourself a moron, I will call you a moron. Get that?

You call yourself a n****r, then you'll be called a n****r. I don't buy into ''we can say it but you can't'' bullcrap.

You call yourself that, you WILL be called that. End of bloody story.

So if you call yourself b*tch, i have the right to do so to? Ever heard of class and being considerate.

I'm mean, the very word is apart of your name tag. Yet i'm not gonna call you one just because your KMC name's affiliated with the word so, bullcrap my ass.

Just like I think chicks whom admit they're bitches are losers.

Though I agree with lil bitchiness, I also feel like she just said it is alright for us to call her a *****. Could we get a check on that, cause I feel the need to oblige.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
So if you call yourself b*tch, i have the right to do so to? Ever heard of class and being considerate.

I'm mean, the very word is apart of your name tag. Yet i'm not gonna call you one just because your KMC name's affiliated with the word so, bullcrap my ass.

Just like I think chicks whom admit they're bitches are losers.


And blacks who admit they are n****r's are losers.

You can call me 'bitchiness' thats why its my username, so people can adress me as such.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
And blacks who admit they are n****r's are losers.

You can call me 'bitchiness' thats why its my username, so people can adress me as such.

Bitchiness is actually a noun.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Taken from FBI website -

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2006/table1.html

I have cited the number of Offenses. On the website you can find the number of offenders and victims.

Anti-White 1,008
Anti-Black 3,136
Anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native 72
Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander 230
Anti-Multiple Races, Group 291

Anti-Jewish 1,027
Anti-Catholic 81
Anti-Protestant 62
Anti-Islamic 191
Anti-Other Religion 140
Anti-Multiple Religions, Group 88
Anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. 8

Anti-Male Homosexual 881
Anti-Female Homosexual 192
Anti-Homosexual 293
Anti-Heterosexual 28
Anti-Bisexual 21

Anti-Hispanic 770
Anti-Other Ethnicity/National Origin 463
Disability: 94
Anti-Physical 20
Anti-Mental 74

Thoughts? Any surprise at the stats?
Or is this more or less what everyone thought the hate crime list would look like?


I demand copies made at Ginko's.