And what have all these pretty shapes on a flat plane got to do with time travel?
maybe someone should prove that Time actually exist, before following some vague theories & going into this creative fantasy direction.
In CERN they accelerated Neutrinos to exceed the speed of light (which accoring to Einsteins theory is impossible), they didn´t re-appear before they left!
Originally posted by inimalist
would you care to explain how time is multidirectional?I'll get the Nobel comity on the phone
you feed diamonds to pigs, they will destory what they don't understand.
laugh 😆 it's funny and i am truly sorry for ever sharing anything with the shits in here.
what did you do to someone's account on you_tube?
no one can share information with you, pretend or "pimp" ideas, and when you can't understand it, you hassle a person.
this is the WRONG BOARD FOR ME.
SO YOU ARE RIGHT, THIS WAS STUPID...OF ME.
Originally posted by Cheesebits
you feed diamonds to pigs, they will destory what they don't understand.laugh 😆 it's funny and i am truly sorry for ever sharing anything with the shits in here.
what did you do to someone's account on you_tube?
no one can share information with you, pretend or "pimp" ideas, and when you can't understand it, you hassle a person.
this is the WRONG BOARD FOR ME.
SO YOU ARE RIGHT, THIS WAS STUPID...OF ME.
so...
You post something unrelated to the topic of the thread you create, claim it as proof for a concept that defies all current understandings of physics, and I am comparable to a pig for asking you to describe the most basic part of what would be necessary for time travel.
you are right, this is the wrong board for you, I'd be happy if you didn't come back
Originally posted by inimalist
so...You post something unrelated to the topic of the thread you create, claim it as proof for a concept that defies all current understandings of physics, and I am comparable to a pig for asking you to describe the most basic part of what would be necessary for time travel.
you are right, this is the wrong board for you, I'd be happy if you didn't come back
It seems the OTF would prefer him, but I doubt it, even they would scorn this level of stupidity... hmm
Originally posted by inimalist
I did watch itthe video itself only deals with 3 dimensions and has no mention of time travel...
were the [b]4th
dimension multi-directional, it might have some relevance, but seeing as time moves in one direction, the video is simply some cool lines and graphics [/B]
Really.....this is a 4 dimensional projection on a 2 dimensional plan....
The sphere is 3 dimensions but the "energy source" for the projection is grouped with the sphere, because the sphere is the time-space projector. Just as time is considered the forth dimension, so can this undefined energy that is projected through the sphere.
IF we apply time to the plane, we don't necessarily have to consider it an additional dimension in this construct, we can consider time and space to be specific points on the 2 dimensional plane. The idea that people are referring to in this example is nothing new at all, by any stretch of the imagination. It is a variance on the old "fold a piece of paper over and poke a hole through it with a pencil" idea.
I thoroughly agree that time travel and travel to distant locations is not answered at all by any stretch of the imagination because this is only a souped up version of the old pencil through paper explanation of FTL. (Faster than light travel.)
Of course, this example is a tangible demonstration of an abstract process...this would require some sort of energy to pass through a device that plots time and space on an abstract construct...this process would somehow have to transfer matter to specific points on its abstract construct in order for FTL travel or time travel to occur....so, I can't see anyway that this would work because it wouldn't send energy to specific points...rather, it would send energy evenly distributed across all space time points or give an energy bias to a specific set of points when a spherical translation is performed on the projection.
Then this brings up another problem: .converting matter into energy and then converting that energy back into matter. That doesn't solve the problem of scattering that "energy" all over the place. In order for time space-time travel to work like this, the projection would have to be ridiculously precise. Maybe if the device is ultra complex, this "energy" would have to be projected again onto another projector which in turn is projector onto another projector and so on and so forth until you get a precise space-time point.
Still, this is very far fetched, under simplified, likely not going to aid in a solution, and is nothing new.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Really.....this is a 4 dimensional projection on a 2 dimensional plan....The sphere is 3 dimensions but the "energy source" for the projection is grouped with the sphere, because the sphere is the time-space projector. Just as time is considered the forth dimension, so can this undefined energy that is projected through the sphere.
IF we apply time to the plane, we don't necessarily have to consider it an additional dimension in this construct, we can consider time and space to be specific points on the 2 dimensional plane. The idea that people are referring to in this example is nothing new at all, by any stretch of the imagination. It is a variance on the old "fold a piece of paper over and poke a hole through it with a pencil" idea.
I thoroughly agree that time travel and travel to distant locations is not answered at all by any stretch of the imagination because this is only a souped up version of the old pencil through paper explanation of FTL. (Faster than light travel.)
Of course, this example is a tangible demonstration of an abstract process...this would require some sort of energy to pass through a device that plots time and space on an abstract construct...this process would somehow have to transfer matter to specific points on its abstract construct in order for FTL travel or time travel to occur....so, I can't see anyway that this would work because it wouldn't send energy to specific points...rather, it would send energy evenly distributed across all space time points or give an energy bias to a specific set of points when a spherical translation is performed on the projection.
Then this brings up another problem: .converting matter into energy and then converting that energy back into matter. That doesn't solve the problem of scattering that "energy" all over the place. In order for time space-time travel to work like this, the projection would have to be ridiculously precise. Maybe if the device is ultra complex, this "energy" would have to be projected again onto another projector which in turn is projector onto another projector and so on and so forth until you get a precise space-time point.
Still, this is very far fetched, under simplified, likely not going to aid in a solution, and is nothing new.
will respond later
Originally posted by The Grey Fox
Time is man made, if you understand what I mean hmm
I totally understand what you mean, Ive read loads of books on this stuff, Steven Hawkins "A Brief History of Time" is an excellent example of the insane fantasy of some scientists.
And then theres all this multiple reality rubbish started by the two slit experiment.
Originally posted by The Grey FoxUmmm..........how about the future generations being smart enough not to come back and tell us about it being that we'll eventually discover it ourselves as did the future generations.
Time Travel is a paradox, since if it is going to happen, then it already has happened, meaning we would already know all it's secrets since we would have learnt it from our future selves, but we couldn't learn it that way since how would our future selves know that? hmmIf you get what I mean.
Therefore they wouldn't come back and disrupt the past or cause any paradoxes.
Yeah.......duh.
And just to make it clear, I also believe in Alternate Universes.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
Originally posted by InnerRise
Ummm..........how about the future generations being smart enough not to come back and tell us about it being that we'll eventually discover it ourselves as did the future generations.Therefore they wouldn't come back and disrupt the past or cause any paradoxes.
Yeah.......duh.
And just to make it clear, I also believe in Alternate Universes.
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....
That's one huge assumption; it doesn't support time travel being possible, at all.
Do you have some proof to support your belief of Alternate Universes, or are you merely going on wishful thinking and faith?
Originally posted by RobtardI was pointing out the flaw in his post and that is all. I wasn't trying to prove anything.
That's one huge assumption; it doesn't support time travel being possible, at all.Do you have some proof to support your belief of Alternate Universes, or are you merely going on wishful thinking and faith?
Oh yes.......I think I left my proof of Alternate Universes in my other pants pocket. Let me go get that for you..........
Anata wa wakarimasu ka.....