Originally posted by 2damnloudUsing the bible, or what's IN the the bible to prove that what the bible says is true??
How ELSE would you diagram Creshosk's example? In any case, it's circular reasoning to cite Biblical quotes as fact, when the Bible's authenticity itself is being questioned. Kinda like what you're doing with Storm's "core-powers".
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
How ELSE would you diagram Creshosk's example? In any case, it's circular reasoning to cite Biblical quotes as fact, when the Bible's authenticity itself is being questioned. Kinda like what you're doing with Storm's "core-powers".
The bible can be proven and disproven by empirical evidence. Comics cannot.
The bible being used to prove what it says for which there may or may not be any sceintific evidence, is a fallacy, sine the validity of the bible is the bone of contention.
You cannot use the bible to prove the bible.
I, however, can use the comics to prove my point.
It's a false analogy because there is only one kind of evidence which proves my point(the comics).
Originally posted by 2damnloudYou have no evidence of her being able to kill doomsday in a way that he hasn't already been killed. Ice? Lightning? High intensity plasma?
Nope.Storm ftw
Yes, Storm is really going to kill all life on the planet by throwing a star at him, which he's already survived the heat of before.
Sorry, Storms got nothing, if you'd read anything about doomsday you'd know about how he adpats to become immune to things that killed him before.
Oh and Argumentum ad inifinitum. Or ad nasuem. 😉
Originally posted by 2damnloud
The bible can be proven and disproven by emperical evidence. Comics cannot.The bible being used to prove what it says for which there may or may not be any sceintific evidence, is a fallacy, sine the validity of the bible is the bone of contention.
You cannot use the bible to prove the bible.
I, however, can use the comics to prove my point.
It's a false analogy because there is only one kind of evidence which proves my point(the comics).
So you can't use the bible to prove the bible, but you can use your feats to prove your feats?
Sham distinction fallacy to call it a false analogy.
You can try and justify your circular reasoning all you want. ITs still circular reasoning. 🙂
Originally posted by Creshosk
You have no evidence of her being able to kill doomsday in a way that he hasn't already been killed. Ice? Lightning? High intensity plasma?Yes, Storm is really going to kill all life on the planet by throwing a star at him, which he's already survived the heat of before.
Sorry, Storms got nothing, if you'd read anything about doomsday you'd know about how he adpats to become immune to things that killed him before.
Oh and Argumentum ad inifinitum. Or ad nasuem. 😉
The location of the fight has not been specified.
Originally posted by Creshosk
So you can't use the bible to prove the bible, but you can use your feats to prove your feats?Sham distinction fallacy to call it a false analogy.
You can try and justify your circular reasoning all you want. ITs still circular reasoning. 🙂
Strawman.
They're not "my" feats.
Wolverine has been depicted with magical, golden claws.
Batman has batkicked the Hulk and knocked the wind out of him.
They happened, but it's disregarded. They were one-shots, after all. Want something that happened in the mainstream?
Robin beat Impulse (a speedster). It happened, but it doesn't mean it is logical, or even acceptable.
Storm channeled all that power once or twice in her 30+ years in comics. In those 30+ years, exponentially lesser feats have exhausted or nearly killed her on several occasions. She cannot manipulate, much less handle the power of the core under her own power.
But, you'd have us believe otherwise.
Doomsday kills her in every and any scenario.
Originally posted by 2damnloudWishfulthinking fallacy.
StrawmanYou should clarify next time.
Quit using the fallacies improperly. It's obvious that you don't know how to use them properly based on your frequently using them improperly.
There was no strawman. You did claim that Storm can manipulate stars because of the Galactic core feat.
Do you even know what a strawman is or are you going to quote from wikipedia? sly
Originally posted by Eternal Idol
Wolverine has been depicted with magical, golden claws.Batman has batkicked the Hulk and knocked the wind out of him.
They happened, but it's disregarded. They were one-shots, after all. Want something that happened in the mainstream?
Robin recently beat Impulse (a speedster). It happened, but it doesn't mean it is logical, or even acceptable.
Storm channeled all that power once or twice in her 30+ years in comics. In those 30+ years, exponentially lesser feats have exhausted or nearly killed her on several occasions. She cannot manipulate, much less handle the power of the core under her own power.
But, you'd have us believe otherwise.
Doomsday kills her in every and any scenario.
They're powers were blatantly insufficient.
Storm's are not.
You can count maybe two instances of her channeling something that exhausted her. That blizzard in 121 and.......what else??????
There are even instances where things become "easy to her" simply be gaining a new attitude, namely punk Storm where she notes that it would exhast her but doesn't
Her getting exhausted is with= or <<<< her other power feats.
Since fighters fight at their best....
Some of these rules contradict SMvsFL/Full Capacity. 🙄
Originally posted by 2damnloud
They're powers were blatantly insufficient.Storm's are not.
You can count maybe two instances of her channeling something that exhausted her. That blizzard in 121 and.......what else??????
There are even instances where things become "easy to her" simply be gaining a new attitude, namely punk Storm where she notes that it would exhast her but doesn't
Her getting exhausted is with= or <<<< her other power feats.
Since fighters fight at their best....
Some of these rules contradict SMvsFL/Full Capacity. 🙄
Let's say storm fights to this lvl you are talking about? So what is stopping her from getting speed blitzed? She still has human reaction times and durability. What would she be able to crank out to beat DD that hasn't already been tried?
Originally posted by Creshosk
Wishfulthinking fallacy.Quit using the fallacies improperly. It's obvious that you don't know how to use them properly based on your frequently using them improperly.
There was no strawman. You did claim that Storm can manipulate stars because of the Galactic core feat.
Do you even know what a strawman is or are you going to quote from wikipedia? sly
Misinterpretation of my positon and refuting the misinterpreatation.
You claimed I was grasping at straws whne it was you who was unclear.
Originally posted by 2damnloudOh yeah you "unintentionally" misunderstood me. 🙄
Misinterpretation of my positon and refuting the misinterpreatation.
I'm not stupid so don't try to pull that trick. sly
Originally posted by 2damnloudSuure... you misunderstood me unintentionally. 🙄
You claimed I was grasping at straws whne it was you who was unclear.
Originally posted by 2damnloudlike the core feat. it only happened once. IT's clearly smvFL. 🙂
They're powers were blatantly insufficient.Storm's are not.
You can count maybe two instances of her channeling something that exhausted her. That blizzard in 121 and.......what else??????
There are even instances where things become "easy to her" simply be gaining a new attitude, namely punk Storm where she notes that it would exhast her but doesn't
Her getting exhausted is with= or <<<< her other power feats.
Since fighters fight at their best....
Some of these rules contradict SMvsFL/Full Capacity. 🙄
Originally posted by Creshosk
like the core feat. it only happened once. IT's clearly smvFL. 🙂
Oh please.
That's not the only qualifier for SMvfl.
It's based on the premise that a characters powers are blatantly insufficient therfore they rarely repeat it.
Storm has shown she can do stars, dimension, and Eternity.
Alter the hemisphere, or the entire planet.